Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
1,162 results
0.20s
Oral argument — United States v. James Romans
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2015
Regarding the purchase of the vehicle, that was nothing that the court brought in regarding my client's, what they had said were overt acts in Dallas, but it's not an overt act, Your Honor. … Well, we don't know what was going on in Indiana from the record, so I can't comment on that.
65 min of audioOral argument — Ralph Smith, Jr. v. James Hood, III
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2017
Smith subjected to these unconstitutional acts, if they're in the causal chain, then they can . . . then it's fair game for them. … I think he's talking about some kind of analysis that you do when there's a Rehabilitation Act issue that's involved.
42 min of audioOral argument — Whitney Bank v. SMI Companies Global, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 5, 2019
But all during that period, from April of 2015 through July of 2016, SMI is hemorrhaging cash. As a credit, it looks terrible. … I agree with you that it was very illogical, but that doesn't, as I agree, I agree, But what my opposing counsel points out in a couple of the comments that he made were bad faith breaches.
40 min of audioOral argument — Boudreaux v. LA State Bar Assn
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2021
Are there the number of objections over a certain period of years to fees? It's not in the record, Judge, but I can answer your question if you wish. Uh, the over the years, a rare event. … Sure, but even Justice Thomas and Gorsuch's comments, uh, don't really pertain to this issue because the plaintiffs in the Jarchow case did not raise the issue about what Keller preserved.
56 min of audioOral argument — Rachel Escamilla v. Pamela Elliott
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2019
Is there any factor that identifies to whom, in other words, the recipient of the comment as a factor on whether it's public or private speech, protected speech? … What was the period of time here? In this particular case? I believe Your Honor was right that it was 19 months, almost two years, or maybe even over two years. Why wouldn't that be undue delay?
46 min of audioOral argument — In Re: JPMorgan Chase & Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2019
So, counsel, that comment gets to the content of the district court's discretion to issue notices in FLSA collective action. … Or another one, let's say the judge said I want notice to go to people far past the tolling period.
49 min of audioOral argument — George Alvarez v. City of Brownsville
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 17, 2018
Can you comment on that characterization? … You made a comment in your brief, too, that actually when a policymaker makes a decision, that's policy.
91 min of audioOral argument — Marquette Trans v. Navigation Mrtm
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 5, 2023
The first Congress of the United States recognized in its ninth legislative act, which actually predates the Judiciary Act by which federal courts were created by six weeks, it recognized the principle … It says that if you want to sue a pilot for damages when he's acting under a state commission, you must do two things.
66 min of audioOral argument — John Bludworth v. Manson Construction
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 1, 2025
So, again, it acts as an independent booster barge, and it has a separate pumping capacity. … In Able Counsel, there's no case, period, that said anything about that, correct? So it's not just never said there was, it's never said there wasn't. This is sui generis for us.
49 min of audioOral argument — Michael Hewitt v. Helix Energy Solutions Group, et
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2020
Each exemption under the Fair Labor Standards Act, okay, has duties test, salary test, and salary level test. … It means he must receive it regardless of any time period worked, which is exactly what he did get.
45 min of audioOral argument — Markle Interests, L.L.C. v. U.S. Fish and W
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2015
There was dialogue in the sense that the landowners commented on this, and they stated their preferences to not have frogs. … All we've got here is the designation they're required to make, and they've made it, and it's justified by the expert support, period. That's exactly right.
42 min of audioOral argument — Ralph Janvey v. James Alguire
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2014
It sounds suspiciously like if there's no standing here, then the people who invested and ended up making money out of it do not have to give up those profits, period. … I would like to draw the court's attention to two facts and one principle of law, and the principle of law will come back to the comment Judge Higginson made just a moment ago.
48 min of audioOral argument — SEC v. Yossef Kahlon
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2017
But in other contexts, aren't there holding periods? I mean, the SEC has at least told people that you can hold the stock like after an initial offering. … And the other comment I would have as to remedy, Your Honor, is the Court, as observed, and we're in this circuit because there's a Texas connection.
54 min of audioOral argument — Amanda Foster v. Principal Life Insurance Co.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2019
They needed to act diligently and reliably in compliance with the court's obligations. … As is being in an office for a long period of time. All these things about her job were brought to light.
39 min of audioOral argument — Torrey v. Infectious Diseases Socty
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 7, 2023
Placibure, because I think that that case is applicable here in support of the plaintiff's position, because in that case, this court held that false commercial speech was actionable under the Lanham Act … At the very end of the discovery period, literally the last day, the afternoon that we finished the last deposition, they amended their complaint to allege new misrepresentation claims based on facts they
43 min of audioOral argument — Kevan Brumfield v. Burl Cain, Warden
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2015
What the State points to is Justice Breyer's comment during oral argument. That's the only thing the State points to. … Greenspan, said it is unlikely that someone who suffers from intellectual disability would be able to perpetuate within a two-week period a span of very successful armed robberies in which he had a leadership
61 min of audioOral argument — Jeffery Wood v. William Stephens, Director
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2014
argument that if a judge does have certain personal knowledge that that might be recusable but I don't think just in general that the the possession of personal knowledge alone is recusable it's the acting … who concluded he had not made a substantial showing he attempted to appeal to the CCA and they said we're prohibited by statute from considering your appeal because you weren't talented in the 20-day period
60 min of audioOral argument — LA Fair Housing Action v. Azalea Garden
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2023
So, we receive a lot of grant funding, and as a result of that grant funding, we have certain program activities required to carry out through that grant period. … I also wanted to address something that dovetails comments that Judge Ho or questions he was asking, and I think one of the main issues with the construction of the Fair Housing Act and disparate impact
50 min of audioOral argument — Zyla Life Sciences v. Wells Pharma
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 5, 2024
The district court put a period in the middle of that sentence, and it said that registration by itself was enough for the exemption. That's just not what the statute says. … They're still preempted, is the District Court thought, under Section 337A of the Federal Act. Well, what does 337A say?
42 min of audioOral argument — Dubash v. City of Houston
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2025
And the video, obviously videos on like, you know, TV and stuff can certainly have comments and things. I'm well aware of that. Now, of course, in the 1700s, I don't think they had videos. … As this court said in Robinson, censorship based on subjective determinations about what is offensive is impermissible viewpoint discrimination, period. Uh, your honor, very quickly touching on Mr.
41 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.