Documents

Oral argument — Hewlett Custom Home Design v. Frontier Custom Buil

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 5, 2014

Now, I will comment on a couple of things. Mr. Cooper indicated that the Danielson case was an architectural case. It actually is not. Danielson is a pre-AWCPA case. … AWCPA Architecture Works Copyright Protection Act of 1990. Danielson involved infringement of blueprints, not architectural works.

Oral argument — Mitchell Law v. Bessie Jeanne

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 1, 2021

Moving on, appellee has repeatedly referred to Judge Lynn's observations as if they are evidence, but her comments only explain why we're here today. … Well, I think primarily your honor, we think that the law supporting our appeal is why we're here because we don't believe that the district court acted properly.

Oral argument — Kenneth Toney v. State Farm Lloyds

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2015

Black that talks about his experience with the city during that time period. … I believe that Judge Hughes' comment was in discussing what is legally required.

Oral argument — Highland Captl v. Highland Captl Mgmt

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2022

Your Honor, may it please the Court, I'd like to first address the comment that Judge King had in asking why did we file the motion. … And proceeding by motion during the period between confirmation and the effective date, nothing unusual with that. In fact, in this case, we needed exit financing. So what did we do?

Oral argument — Kuwait Pearls Catering Co. WLL v. Kellogg Brown &

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2016

Irrelevant comment. I hope that it was not them. … Period. And the fact that they say, well, we'll have to get into this discussion as to why, that's interesting for tort cases.

Oral argument — Lincoln General Insurance Co. v. U.S. Auto Insuran

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2014

president and majority owner of CSI and Alpha, the companies that this money passed through on its way into his father's pockets and in his pockets, over $30 million into his pockets over a couple-year period … The second sentence of 7.1 I also want to comment on, because I don't think they're reading it correctly.

Oral argument — Jerry Sun v. CIR

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2017

The tax court's opinion casts some doubt on that because it says it wasn't clear whether it was 10 percent per year or a cumulative 10 percent at the end of the 10-year period. Mr. … Your Honor, to answer that question and also comment on something that Mr.

Oral argument — United States v. Jonathon Nora

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2020

Well, just doing your job could be consistent with acting in a fraudulent manner. … Can you comment about that? The plea bargaining process seems to set this up much as anything else and it translates into the outcome of the case.

Oral argument — Nicole Mabry v. Lee County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2016

It seems like that's how, around the country, these are being litigated, that Florence is just not applicable, period, end. … But we think that he is, in this situation, acting as a judicial officer pursuant to our law, and that he is the one that could make that analysis.

Oral argument — James Rodriguez v. Harris County, Texas, et

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2014

Well, I just want to note, Judge Stewart, for purposes of this recording, that counsel, your comment just flies in the face of your reply brief at page 15, which I read to you, but there's no point in … They have always been, both cities, the entirety of them, have always, or for a very, very long period, been in a single commissioner's court precinct. And that was Precinct 2.

Oral argument — Shudde Fath v. TX Dept of Transportation, e

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2016

It is not subject to NEPA, period, full stop. The only way that NEPA can be applicable to 45 is through segmentation analysis. … Hicks argued that cutting down habitat is a violation of the Endangered Species Act. Habitat is a take. There is no claim filed by anybody anywhere under the Endangered Species Act.

Oral argument — Boyd v. Cleara

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 31, 2025

Boyd's claims arising under the Federal Fair Credit Reporting Act. The dismissal was granted based on personal jurisdiction grounds. … If CLRA did not maintain these business practices where they consistently profited off the sale of Texas public records, they would have never met John Boyd, period.

Oral argument — United States v. Rose

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2024

Do you want to comment on the Erlinger issue? Is that present in this case? No, it is not. Erlinger has not been found to be retroactive to successive motions. … And then, based on Garrett and Lerma, affirm and say that the aggravated robbery by threat is a valid act of predicate and continues to be.

Oral argument — Direct Biologics v. McQueen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 1, 2022

Several years ago, the FDA had let them be unregulated, what's called 361 of the Food and Drug Act. … Well, apart from the Allograft, the MEO product, which certainly he's going to be leading the product development team on, I do want to make a comment about the nature of the proof that the court seems

Oral argument — Spell v. Edwards

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2021

What authority other than, um, then perhaps some views on natural law and in the founders statements, what authority do we have to act in the way that you would have us to act today? … So if they specified a period of time where their institution was treated differently than others, why doesn't that get to the heart of sort of RCD and South Bay?

Oral argument — Rx Solutions v. Caremark

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2025

The existing record doesn't tell us if the elder Cain had any relationship to Rx in the 2021-23 period. But it does in the complaint. The complaint says that he is not a member, that it is. … Judge Ozerden, and I think your primary argument is just Twombly deficiency as to Sherman Act generally, whether it's geographic market or anti-competitive injury.

Oral argument — Sandoval Argueta v. Bondi

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 26, 2025

It was a unique afterthought comment, but I guess maybe I'm not really sure Jimenez is relevant at all. … That Immigration and Nationality Act has an aggravated felony definition. Best authority is authority is Shroff, which was a footnote.

Oral argument — Uptown Grill, L.L.C. v. Michael Shwartz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2019

The panel's comments regarding the award with respect was strictly trademarks within or upon 626 South Carrollton Avenue. The panel did not award trade dress. … It acts like a diner. They sell stuff just like a diner does. That's not inherently distinctive. That's very descriptive at best.

Oral argument — Petersen v. Johnson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 6, 2022

Not, beyond just backing off, the, the, the Grindr messages contain effectively proof positive that, that the, the act of solicitation in terms of the, the act of requesting and following through with … My question is, is this a 1983 suit for a wrongful arrest, period?

Oral argument — Richard Jordan v. Marshall Fisher

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2015

I don't have any comment about that. Your Honor, I would hesitate to say what the Mississippi legislature might be considering. However— Of course, of course. … The statute says ultra-short-acting barbiturate, and a barbiturate is a set of classes of drugs. Ultra-short-acting barbiturate is a subclass of that. Midazolam is a benzodiazepine.