Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.33s
Reply Brief — McGautha v. California
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1971
California, 386 U.S. 18, 21-24.] … Pennsylvania, supra, 382 U.S. 399, in which the question was not involved. a knowledge of the jury.
402 U.S. 183Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2007
Ed. 399 (1994) City of Philadelphia v. New Jersey, 437 US. 617; 98 S. Ct. 2531; 57 L. Ed. 475 (1978) Halle Cos. v. Crofton Civic Ass'n, 339 Md 131, 661 A.2d 682 (1994) Hughes v. … Ed. 399 (1994) may be is helpful.
Appellants Brief — Palmer v. City of Euclid
Supreme Court brief · Appellants Brief · 1971
S. 399 (1966). … Pennsylvama, 382 U.S. 399 (1966); Shuttlesworth v.
402 U.S. 544Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 16, 2003
will take comments on its proposed rule for “Participation by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in Procurement under Environmental Protection Agency Financial Assistance Agreements,” published on July 24 … Inter American University of PR, Central Office of the System, 399 Galileo Street—End, Jardines Metropolitanos, Rio Piedras, San Juan, PR 00927. 3.
68 FR 59563Environmental Protection AgencyPetition for Writ of Certiorari — Bolton v. City of Dallas, Texas (No. 08-704)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2008
(See pp. 15- 24, infra). … See id. at 399-400.
Federal Register · Notice · Jul 10, 2024
MC2024-391, CP2024-399. Sean C. Robinson, Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law. [FR Doc. 2024-15156 Filed 7-9-24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
89 FR 56780Postal ServiceFederal Register · Notice · Nov 21, 2024
MC2025-401, K2025-399. Sean C. Robinson, Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law. [FR Doc. 2024-27224 Filed 11-20-24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
89 FR 92195Postal ServiceAmicus Brief — Detroit Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1979
NLRB, 399 F.2d 455, 457 (6th Cir. 1968). … NLRB, 399 F.2d 455, 457 (6th Cir. 1968).
440 U.S. 301Opposition Brief — Donnelly v. Eklutna, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1989
In 1950, PSC 399 also withdrew the land. Pet. App. E at 60a. … Petition at 23-24.
488 U.S. 1046Petition — Vinson v. Richmond Police Department
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978
Kroger Co., 399 F. Supp. 725 (W. … Kroger Co., 399 F. Supp. 724 (W.D.
438 U.S. 903Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. Cleveland
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1972
Eastern Airlines, Inc., 399 F. 2d 14 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 979 (1968) ............ 10, 19, 22 Smith & Son v. Taylor, 276 U.S. 179 (1928) ......... 24, 25 Stiles v. … Dicken joined in P the motion (R. 24).
409 U.S. 249Federal Register · Notice · Mar 10, 2014
Data from the public is requested pursuant to Public Law 99-399 (Omnibus Diplomatic Security and Antiterrorism Act of 1986), as amended; Public Law 107-56 (USA PATRIOT Act); and Executive Order 13356. … Dated: February 24, 2014. Michael Dennis, Attorney-Adviser, Office of Private International Law.
79 FR 13370State DepartmentAmicus Curiae Brief — National Credit Union Admin. v. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
Clarke, 479 U.S. at 399-400 (citing Invest- ment Co. Institute v. Camp, 401 U.S, 617 (1971)). … See Clarke, 479 U.S. at 399 (quoting Block, 467 U.S. at 347).
522 U.S. 479Amicus Curiae Brief — Gerstein v. Pugh
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975
Alabama, : 399 UsSs 1 (1970). scccvccnccvee 71°58 Cooltdge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443 (1970)...sce00- << 9 Sage APS gh ii Dresner v. … The Court's conclusion that "...an eight day (24 hours for initial ap- pearance plus seven days) deprivation of liberty is not reasonable..." (App. 111) is clearly erroneous under Rule 5(c).
420 U.S. 103Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — United States v. John Barth Co.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1929
¢ “Matutes Revenue Act of 918 Act of Peh 24 1s 18 40 Seat t Sex ‘a s 4 a t 4 jt Sec. 2M id 18 Revenue Act af 192), Act of Nev 24, 192) i%¢, 42 Stat Sex 2M d 14 Revenue Act of 1924, Act of June 2 … Act of Feb. 24, 1919. (40 Btat. L. 1057-96, C. 18.)
279 U.S. 370Brief for the United States in Opposition — Morgan v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States in Opposition · 1969
On the basis of those supplement- ed findings and its own review of the record, the court of apneals th¥n affirmed. 399 F. 2d 93 (Pet. App. 13- 24). No further review is warranted. … App. 23 n. 2, 24).
393 U.S. 1025Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1994
The United States Court of Appeals. for the First Circuit affirmed said judgment by Opinion dated June 24, 1993 (3a). … P. 24.’ 3. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24 provides, in relevant part: (a) Intervention of Right. Upon timely application anyone shall be permitted to, intervene in an action: ...
Security Zone; Suisun Bay, Concord, CA
Federal Register · Rule · Jan 24, 2005
In addition, Coast Guard Group San Francisco Bay maintains a telephone line that is maintained 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. … The public can contact Group San Francisco Bay at (415) 399-3530 to obtain information concerning enforcement of this rule.
70 FR 3299Homeland Security DepartmentCoast GuardSpecial Local Regulation; Mavericks Surf Competition, Half Moon Bay, CA
Federal Register · Rule · Feb 15, 2011
Basis and Purpose The Mavericks Surf Competition is a one day “Big Wave” surfing competition consisting of the top 24 big wave surfers and only occurs when 15-20 foot waves are sustained for over 24 hours … (4) Persons or vessels may request permission to enter the regulated area on VHF-16 or through the 24-hour Command Center telephone at (415)-399-3547.
76 FR 8651Homeland Security DepartmentCoast GuardSupreme Court brief · Opposition · 1976
Computing Scale Co., 261 US. 399, 43 S.Ct. 458 (1923) United States v. … The Petition seeks review of an Order of the Fifth Circuit filed May 24, 1976, denying a Petition for a Writ of Mandamus (Apx. 56).
429 U.S. 1023
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.