Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.10s
Amicus Curiae Brief — BP p.l.c., et al., Petitioners v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 17, 2022
It held unanimously that the climate claims there sounded in the federal common law and that Congress displaced any such claims when it enacted the Clean Air Act. See id. at 424. … Second, and only then, did the Court hold Congress displaced through the Clean Air Act remedies that might be granted under federal common law. See AEP, 564 U.S. at 425.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Scott Timber Co., et al., Petitioners v. Oregon Wild, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 19, 2018
Water Act. … Indeed, violations of the Clean Water Act can include criminal penalties as well as fines up to $37,500 for each day a party is in violation of the Act. See id.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 20, 2018
Cf. 42 U.S.C. § 7607(d) (stating that the Clean Air Act’s rulemaking provisions “shall not apply in the case of any rule or circumstance referred to” in the APA’s interpretive-rule exception). … Congress was concerned that “important polices [were] being developed without benefit of the public notice and comment period.” H.R. Rep. No. 100-391, at 430 (1987).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 3, 2019
of 1934 (NFA) and Gun Control Act of 1968 (GCA). … As I promised, today the Department of Justice will issue the rule banning BUMP STOCKS with a mandated comment period. We will BAN all devices that turn legal weapons into illegal machine guns.”
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2019
Bleicher, Economic and Technical Feasibility in Clean Air Act Enforcement Against Stationary Sources, 89 Harv. L.. … Bleicher, Economic and Technical Feasibility in Clean Air Act Enforcement Against Stationary Sources, 89 Harv. L.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Rapanos v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
§ 1311(a) Clean Water Act § 402(p), 33 U.S.C. § 1342(p) Clean Water Act § 502(7) 33 U.S.C. § 1362(7) Clean Water Act § 502(12), 33 U.S.C. … (See Clean Water Act § 402(p), 33 U.S.C. § 1342(p).)
547 U.S. 715Amicus Curiae Brief — K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc. (No. 86-495)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1988
Lec Cee S Ce Se eee Sa VAWe potas eeoezess 9 42 U.S.C. § 7401, et seq., Clean Air Act................ 5,8 42 U.S.C. § 7521, Energy Policy and Conservation Act. . 10 Ariz. Rev. Stat. … Savings Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1901, et seg.; emissions standards, warranties, reporting and recall provisions in the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401, et seg.; noise standards in the Noise Control Act of
Amicus Curiae Brief — Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002
Linde Air Products Co.*! proposed the tripartite test used 36 Odiorne v. Winkley, 18 F. Cas. 581, 582 (C.C.D. Mass. 1814). 37 Patent Act of 1836, ch. 357, 5 Stat. 117, 119 (1836). 38 Winans v. … Linde Air Products Co. 339 U.S. 605, 606 (1950).
535 U.S. 722Amicus Curiae Brief — Department of Education, et al., Petitioners v. Myra Brown, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 3, 2023
Impac Ltd., 432 U.S. 312 (1977) ............................................... 13 Utility Air Regul. Grp. v. … Id. at 2609 (quoting Utility Air Regul. Grp. v. EPA, 573 U.S. 302, 324 (2014)). Yet the EPA produced no “clear congressional authorization” for its action. Id. at 2614.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1996
THE COURT BELOW FAILED TO EXPLAIN WHY CONGRESS WOULD ACT SUB SILEN- TIO TO INCREASE THE THREAT OF EN- VIRONMENTAL HARM ON THE OCS WHILE AT THE SAME TIME ACTING EXPRESSLY TO PROTECT THAT ENVIRONMENT … In carrying out these objectives, NRDC has undertaken efforts, inter alia, to obtain clean air, 2 clean water and toxic substances control, including ac- tivities to enSUre effective environmental
519 U.S. 807Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 4, 2024
Open-air drug markets, common in encampments, also alienate potential customers and exasperate business owners. … And outreach teams from Seattle have attempted to address the “open-air drug market” in a local homeless encampment.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Hoechst Celanese Corp. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
App. 123a-24a (the regulation was adopted pursuant to § 112 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7412). … Intemational Trade Commission reports that total 9 annual production (manufacturing) of benzene in the United States during the relevant period was only 5.64 million megagrams.'
524 U.S. 952Amicus Curiae Brief — Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1988
Comments of the Air Transport Association of America to the FAA, Docket No. 25148 (“ATA Comments’’).* ATA proposes that the 7In its questions concerning “minimum” EAPs, the FAA asks, “How far should … ATA Comments at 3.
486 U.S. 1014Amicus Curiae Brief — King v. Burwell, 135 S. Ct. 475 (2014) (No. 14-114)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014
The Court has thus rebuffed EPA when it relied on decades-old provisions of the Clean Air Act to assert “[t]he power to require permits for the construction and modification of tens of thousands, and … Southeast Alaska Conservation Council, the Court extended Chevron deference to a Clean Water Act regulation jointly issued by the Environmental Protection Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers. 557
Amicus Curiae Brief — Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2010
The trigger mechanism used in Arizona's Citizens Clean Elections Act, Ariz. Rev. … The Citizens Clean Elections Act encourages the development and discussion of new ideas by inviting new voices to engage in the political dialogue in Arizona.
562 U.S. 1060Amicus Curiae Brief — Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
liable for the costs of these clean-ups.”). 3 CERCLA provides the President (acting primarily through the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), see Exec. … Pt. 300; see also CERCLA § 101(23), (24) and (31), 42 U.S.C. 9601(23), (24) and (31); Clean Water Act of 1977 (CWA) § 311(c) and (d), 33 U.S.C. 1321(c) and (d).
543 U.S. 157Amicus Curiae Brief — Simpson Paper (Vermont) Co. v. Department of Environmental Conservation
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993
§ 803(a) (3)... 8 ERI BE I hook cictepencinveenetenseqeoincceccceceses 5 Clean Water Act (“CWA”), 33 U.S.C. § 1251-2623 (1988) IB ince snnancnses rnsnsvernosansentose- 3 NI RII 5. sncnceecercensecsenverecesoeseses … Water Act (“CWA”), 33 U.S.C
507 U.S. 970Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 17, 2022
American Trucking Ass’ns, Inc., 531 U.S. 457 (2001) .............................................. 27 Statutes Clean Water Act (the Act), 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq. ..................................... … Jackson, The Dilution of the Clean Water Act, 19 U. Mich. J.L.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 23, 2025
See Dep’t of Air Force v. … Cir. 2025) (cleaned up).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc., Petitioner v. VIP Products LLC
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 23, 2023
By cutting through the constraints imposed by pomp and ceremony, it is a form of irreverence as welcome as fresh air.” Falwell v. … “clean coal” as an oxymoron. 8 The spoof website 7.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.