Documents

Oral argument — Association of American Physicians and Surgeons E

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 27, 2026

Academics and legal commentators do it all the time. I wasn't aware that these are all defamation claims. … Well, a group boycott would require that you have the defendants acting in the same market.

Oral argument — Aaron Booth v. Galveston County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 4, 2020

galveston county on the sixth amendment issue and that is specifically because the judges in question are state district judges who are administering the fair defense plan and those are state actors acting … his deposition if if you rush this uh the counsel hearing up to the very earliest point in time when it could occur and again under the constant oh i'm seeing i'm out of time uh interesting finish your comment

Oral argument — Amer Acdmy of Implant Dentry v. Kelly Parke

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2016

What you're saying is the reasoning would apply to others, but it seems to me the injunction applies to the plaintiffs, applies to the State acting against the plaintiffs. … It is invalid, period. I think it is over-reading the declaratory judgment part. He can only issue an injunction for the plaintiffs themselves.

Oral argument — Chisom v. State of Louisiana

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2024

So the point being, it's a contract, it's a document, it says there, parties didn't agree to say, well, on X period of time, this ends, or only after 1, 2, 3, 4, this ends, et cetera. … I'll start with the last comments and just say that respectfully that those issues are not before this court. This isn't the description of the complaint.

Oral argument — Amazon.com v. NLRB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2024

to do that it was clear that we consider this emergency relief that needed to be granted walked into the hearing thinking that a tarot was going to be granted that day and i think some of the judges comments … can be effectually challenged only by immediate appeal indeed there has been no failure to act the district court acted before the imaginary deadline created by amazon the only reason this case has not

Oral argument — McMurry v. Brunner

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2022

It says there was probable cause, period. There's no second guessing. There's no going back. … I want to make one comment if you. Well, you know, you're nice to put it that way. Thank you.

Oral argument — Elsa Rodriguez v. Houston Independent Sch Dist

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2017

So you're saying Greer, every single personnel decision made within HISD during the period in which Mr. … When that was taken on appeal, I wanted to say this because of your comments in Godot, which I followed.

Oral argument — Diamond Consortium, Inc. v. Mark Hammervold

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2018

I'd like you to comment on that, if you would. … Yegparian acted as counsel throughout the case.

Oral argument — American Stewards of Liberty v. Department

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2020

I mean, they're saying, irrespective of what the agency has done or may do, that they're making a constitutional challenge to the agency's authority, period, to regulate. … Reilander, I just want to ask about the last comment you made about the 70%. Yes.

Oral argument — Lori Rayborn v. Bossier Parish School System, et a

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2017

Number three, under Act 504, which is part of the Rehabilitation Act, she's entitled to have accommodations for her disability in the school environment, including the ability to check her glucose in a … The child was a good student, and so under 504 did not require any type of academic accommodations or extended period, extended time.

Oral argument — Mark Gomez v. Ericsson, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2016

It's, it's an effective period of plan. That plan is stretched over time. It's not based on a single event, like Fort Halifax. … And that's a fair comment for you to make about waiver. But let's assume that there's not a waiver problem.

Oral argument — Eric Darden v. City of Fort Worth, Texas

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 5, 2017

And the gap deals with or covers the period he was seated on the sofa when the whole thing starts and then he's on the floor. … These are police officers who are supposed to be acting reasonably.

Oral argument — Rollins v. Kiffin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 3, 2024

And he also stated six claims against the university itself, Title VI, Title IX, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, and the American with Disabilities Act. … Kiffin acted with discriminatory intent. There was no proof of derogatory terms related to race, sex, or disability.

Oral argument — United States v. Melvin Jackson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 29, 2016

I'll focus my comments on Claim 2, or Claim 3 of Mr. Jackson's brief, the introduction of evidence of the shooting and robbery at Roy's Lounge. … Again, we're talking a 20-second period from the moment that the handgun is revealed to the moment that Jackson is off the screen and out of the picture for good.

Oral argument — United States v. Edgar Diaz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2016

There's a period. … She acted within the discretion. That's sort of the end of the story. And then it's... Someone has to apply the factors.

Oral argument — Robert Passmore, III v. Baylor Health Care

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2015

Section 74351 is Texas substantive and procedural rules that are bound up with the Texas Medical Liability Act that was enacted in 2003. … But I think that could be reasonably implied by our comments that they had conducted discovery.

Oral argument — Williams v. Davis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2022

And if you don't have the correct official under state, under state law, then you don't have a, you can't proceed under ex parte young period. That ends it. Right. … That's my first comment. Second, again, What do you want us to do? I would like you to reverse the district court and dismiss us from this lawsuit.

Oral argument — Le v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2024

But there's nothing similar to that in the Federal Tort Claims Act or outside the medical malpractice context. … The comment was made that, that the first impact theory is implausible, I think was, were the words. In reality, their second impact theory is implausible.

Oral argument — United States v. Jiten Nanda

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 2, 2017

And the Mason case holds that you do not need a special unanimity instruction as to certain overt acts, that it's the conspiracy itself that requires agreement by the jurors, not specific overt acts. … If you have any comment about the loss calculation issue, you want to just rest on your brief on that?

Oral argument — BG Gulf Coast LNG v. Sabine-Neches

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 3, 2022

Reisner, I have a question about this anchorage comment that was made by the other side of the question. … He says that very clearly and decides it before he begins the discussion of the Act.