Documents

Oral argument — SFA Systems, LLC v. Newegg Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2015

The District Court devoted entirely two sentences to our argument here, and the only thing it said there was, just because you filed suit against multiple defendants doesn't mean you act in bad faith. … What a district court generally does is it decides the facts that are put forth before it, and those are the ones it comments on.

Oral argument — SNIPR Technologies Limited v. Rockefeller University

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2023

Well, there is the broader part that the Patent Act, both pre-AIA and AIA, does seek to prevent having interfering patents issued to different entities. … I mean, can you address my, I guess, more of a comment but a question to the Director.

Oral argument — Yissum Research Development Co v. Sony Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2015

with one voice, but through a delegation of initial decision-making authority to any number of possible three-member panels of APJs, none of whose decisions is binding on anybody else without notice and comment … Has the director or any board panel said, this has to do with claim filing versus patent filing, so if an IPR challenges a particular claim, whether the one-year period can be measured from when that claim

Oral argument — Yissum Research Development Co v. Sony Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2015

with one voice, but through a delegation of initial decision-making authority to any number of possible three-member panels of APJs, none of whose decisions is binding on anybody else without notice and comment … So if an IPR challenges a particular claim, whether the one-year period can be measured from when that claim was alleged to be infringed in court, even if infringement of the patent was more than a year

Oral argument — MCKESSON AUTO v. TRANSLOGIC CORP

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2012

These comments were to affirm that you report yourself as a counselor and attorney of this court uprightly in accordance with the law, and that you will support the constitution in that case. … What I was saying is that for each package, each package, period, without a deal with it, each package in the storage rack has exactly one XY coordinate for it.

Oral argument — STAMPS.COM v. ENDICIA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2011

You know, the actual act of adding numbers together is, of course, trivial. … I'm just trying I was responding to Judge Bryson's comment that would it make any difference whatsoever?

Oral argument — RONALD A KATZ TECH v. AMERICAN AIR

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2010

If my colleague Judge Lurie is willing to act on that motion. … This technology lends itself to the explanation not only due to its complexity but also due to the time period. We're talking about inventions made 22 years ago.

Oral argument — Mid Continent Steel & Wire v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 6, 2019

And the evidence below is abundantly clear that Oman Fasteners is reliant or was reliant during the period of investigation on the U.S. customer. … Just a couple of comments to Your Honor's question about the contract and the U.S. customers of Oman Fasteners.

Oral argument — CLS BANK v. ALICE CORPORATION

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2013

That is a logical way to look at the patent act. I've actually written briefs making that point myself. … There is a point at which one moves from the abstract to the concrete, and I appreciate your comment, and I agree, that there is no bright line.

Oral argument — APPLE v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 6, 2012

It can be, Your Honor, because the act of infringement is the selling of an infringing product. Under the Patent Act, we don't look at infringement at the granular level that you're suggesting. … About functionality, period, as it relates to this appeal. No, we actually make alternative grounds arguments, Your Honor, at length.

Oral argument — EmeraChem Holdings, LLC v. Volkswagen Group of America

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2017

But now we look at your case and we have the inventor basically saying, me and my co-inventor invented all of these passages, not the other two co-inventors listed on that patent, and full stop period, … Haroda, Sato, and Stiles likely overcome any differences between Campbell and the subject matter of Claim 1 of the 758 Act. Yet, if you go to the I'm sorry.

Oral argument — Board of Regents of the University of Texas v. Boston Scientific Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2026

It seems to me you've got something that looks and acts a lot like a fiber. You have something that looks thread-like. … That sounds to me like something that is solid and extends over an extended period of time and has a small, very small diameter.