Documents

Oral argument — Kilburg v. Mohiuddin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2013

The clean lace, right? The clean lace, exactly. And this court and all courts have said, that case kind of gives us some hint of what a special relationship is. … That the engine wrapped from a certain number of revolutions to a certain number of revolutions within a period of time, or what?

Oral argument — Pickett v. City of Champaign

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 24, 2014

I mean, are you claiming that there are two separate entities and picking a figure out of the air? … As a result, the 101B of the Tort Immunity Act is invoked. The 101A of the Tort Immunity Act generally says that when a public entity is involved, the statute of limitations expires in one year.

Oral argument — Realty Central, Inc. v. Pippins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2017

Instead, outside the period of time for when the property could be reinspected after Pippins had vacated, these rather large sums of money were claimed for damages that had never been provided notice to … And so ultimately what the court decided was that the gas station was not in breach of those requirements to maintain the property in a clean state, although it did award a recovery to the landlord for

Oral argument — Hollenbeck v. City of Tuscola

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2017

So the decision gets made, hey, if we've got to clean these off, we're going to go for those because they clog, whereas the grass surrounding the others keeps them free of debris. … I'll go ahead and address the comments by Counsel for Kinney since they were fresh. When he said that he did point out that he grasped the moat about 20 or 21 days prior to the injury.

Oral argument — People v. Robinson

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2025

If we make a clean record and say, Hey, the issue that's here that I can't even go forward on is the cause aspect. Okay. And the reason why is X, Y, and Z. … He only commented on that when the court specifically identified that the state had raised this defense, that no cause had been met.

Oral argument — Jackson Park Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2015

Justice Hoffman, since that 16-inch clincher is still hanging in the air, I will feel free to grab my bat and try to whack it out. Can I ask you a question that goes along with that? Sure. … Because the way this Workers' Compensation Act works is petitioners are afforded one opportunity to prove their permanency, to prove their disability.

Oral argument — Illinois Casualty Co. v. Wellington Homes, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2015

The acts or omissions are missing. … Isn't it disingenuous to suggest that this comment about a claim being potentially within the policy is a holding when it's really we were setting out what the facts of the case were?

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Walden

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 15, 2015

The judge indicated that he had read our written motions, and he made that comment, which, as you know, did not provide any further clarification. … An issue has been raised on appeal that the court aired by refusing to reduce Scott's child support obligation following his unemployment.

Oral argument — TWL Enterprises v. Freda

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2010

Now, one of the cases that we cite, the Edward Lumber case, reminds me of my days as a young lawyer in the early 70s, mid-70s, a period before Judge Bulla in the motion court. … And Judge Bulla stated, as our Supreme Court has stated, that the Mechanics Leaning Act is an act that must be liberally construed to provide a remedy. It's a remedial act.

Oral argument — Dixon v. Maggart

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 29, 2013

And it was a very clean trial. The plaintiff's counsel has not argued that there were any errors in the trial itself. … Even assuming plaintiff acted in a legal manner, a jury could still find that she was contributory negligent.

Oral argument — Baldwin v. Ward Chrysler Center Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 18, 2026

We had filed it and asked to be heard upon it, and the time period to file an interlocutory appeal ran. … The plaintiffs did not address this issue in their response brief on appeal, and such first air goes unchallenged.

Oral argument — People v. Morse

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2015

This defendant, again, could have gone to bench trial in front of this judge with a clean slate and, sure, you know. … Period. That happened. Okay, well, where's the unfairness then? Instead of prejudice, we'll talk about what was unfair about the ultimate conclusion.

Oral argument — People v. Davis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 23, 2024

However, skipping stages in the Post-Conviction Hearing Act borders on routine for a number of different reasons. … So it's not like we had to deal with a lengthy period of time away from where the scene was.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Chez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 15, 2013

Clean it up, do whatever they want to do with it, and they sell it. So this is not a surprise. It should not have been a surprise to Mr. … And as to their comment that the IMDMA displaced that law, it would have displaced it had the parties elected to follow the IMDMA.

Oral argument — Heartland Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 19, 2026

The other case, absolute cleaning, was a clear issue of dispute. He said, she said. The issue was whether Dr. … It still comes down, two separate sections of the act.

Oral argument — Board of Education v. IL Educational Labor Board

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2013

The first is that this court has a clean slate to protect the student records, confidentiality of student records here, because the standard of review is novel. … You have a 14-day notice period. If you'd like to put a rebuttal in there, we'll send that right along, too. That's something we would have been willing to consider.

Oral argument — Harris v. Adame

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 19, 2014

Well, because Arthur conveyed as fee simple absolute under the Conveyances Act, and that's the key, because the Conveyances Act provides that when you convey by warranty deed, it's fee simple absolute, … The probate act is really clear that as far as Arnold's concerned, Arnold had no capacity to execute the deed. That's clear under the probate act.

Oral argument — Hawkins v. The Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 15, 2010

Just drawn out of the air. No response. … Just a couple of comments, Your Honors. In common language, you addressed his public policy purposes of the act analysis that he says militates against your position.

Oral argument — Service Employees International Union v. ILRB, Local Panel

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2017

It makes sense that the General Assembly did not pull this very peculiar phrase out of thin air. It pulled it from Nacolni. And therefore, it should be interpreted in accordance with Nacolni. … It used it in other provisions, other sections of the Act.

Oral argument — Biggs v. Wyatt

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2015

Wendler said, they're all ADA cases, Americans with Disabilities Act and Rehabilitation Act cases. And none of those cases deal with disputes over causation of the disability. … The plaintiff has argued that the Verdict Form D, it was air for that to go to the jury.