Documents

Oral argument — Bannum Inc v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2009

But it hasn't demonstrated that the contracting officer or the source selection team acted separate and apart from what was required by the solicitation, that it acted inconsistent with the terms of the … Peck links that to the death which occurred during his period of service. That should be sufficient as a matter of law under the correct interpretation of this regulation. Thank you very much.

Oral argument — Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2024

If you want to tag a party with a duty to act, then the judge needs to make clear that there's a duty to act. … So the one argument they make about the end of the interest period, at appendix 2538, you'll see our table, reduced to $1.5 million. So we took care of that. They haven't made this 2013.

Oral argument — LUPIN ATLANTIS HOLDINGS v. MYLAN INC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 22, 2013

First, let me respond to a comment by Judge O'Malley about the context in which it sort of smelled a little bit like claim construction in summary judgment. … And this court found that the ITC acted properly in finding infringement in that case.

Oral argument — Graham Engineering v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2007

The 1930 Tariff Act provided for an exportation of articles manufactured or produced. Okay. Then the regulations under that statute required notice from 1930. … I don't mean to flog the history, but 1313A in the 1930 Act, exportation of goods manufactured, it's got the stuff in it.

Oral argument — Bayer CropScience AG v. Dow AgroSciences LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2016

We have a good idea of what it is Bayer would have demanded if Stein had been acting as a straw for Dow. … And it's deferential, the court explained, because the district court lives with the case over a prolonged period of time.

Oral argument — Gaghan v. OPM

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 1, 2007

In other words, the error is qualified by, as I put in the comments, those are important, because the error had to do something like mistake or fraud or something that the appellant did. … Right, but I see the bottom-line conclusion, the doctor saying the symptoms would have affected his work performance during the time 1994 to 2001, but during that time period he's receiving accolades.

Oral argument — Lesko v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2025

Yes, and you know, earlier the comment about, oh, well, we're not policymakers. You know, if we win today, if we were to win this appeal, it doesn't mean we win this case. … So you had a 10, 11 year period where the regulation was in effect. Congress revisited the overtime pay scheme and didn't change the statute then.

Oral argument — AbbVie Inc. v. Medimmune Limited

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2017

You seem to gloss over in your comments, and that's fine, that a validity determination would resolve all of this. And that's the rub, right? … You would then refuse to pay whatever amounts come due for that last six months period.

Oral argument — Puente v. DHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2006

It was based upon the acts which led up to the arrest. Again, that is what they argued at arbitration. … He doesn't expressly make that comment. But if you look at that testimony as a whole, it becomes extremely clear that what the chief was most concerned about here was Mr. Puente's conduct.

Oral argument — Snyder v. OPM

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2006

Snyder receive a lifetime benefit for her entire life, including the period after Mr. Ruff passes away. … With respect to the issue of misconduct, the administrative judge made some comments on the record at the end of the hearing that are, I think, helpful in addressing that question.

Oral argument — Gensetix, Inc. v. Baylor College of Medicine

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2020

But, but, but importantly, in the Regents case, Regents did not find waiver, period, full stop. Regents found, based on the Supreme Court's United States v. … For that reason, that is why I think, coming back to Judge O'Malley's comment, that the University of Utah case does in many ways control this case.

Oral argument — Encyclopedia v. Alpine Electronics

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2009

All entries during the period of the third administrative review, is that right? All entries, yes. They're not going to liquidate any entries after the third period of review? … Your Honor, if I may with regard to counsel's last comment, I've been practicing for 41 years.

Oral argument — Shen Wei v. Sempermed

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2010

First, there are no records of any tests or analyses that would demonstrate what was on the OSTAR glove at the relevant time period. … Just as the filing of an ANDA is considered an act of infringement, that's statutorily mandated. Here, Semper Med was sued. They accused Enhanced Gloves very broadly on the complete patent.

Oral argument — Rembrandt Wireless v. Samsung Electronics

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2017

If you look at 2171, you can see that it's the SIWI Act reference that's actually used. That's part of the discussion that's being used in the rejection. … They were trying to distance themselves from the SIWI Act reference, which used both frequency modulation and OFDM modulation.

Oral argument — LaBatte v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2018

That the genus of cases under the Tucker Act is breach of contract, and there's a species called breach of settlement agreement. … What that leads me to conclude, or to ask you to comment, is if the claims administrator, even incorrectly, because we don't get to review that, said, and based a finding in the alternative on the fact

Oral argument — MICROSOFT CORPORATION v. DATATERN

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2013

Those are post-complaint acts. Our case law is crystal clear that post-complaint acts cannot be considered for determining whether jurisdiction exists. … If I may just comment very briefly back to the normalization. One sentence. Logical table is not introduced in Column 4. It is introduced in Column 1.

Oral argument — Williams v. Gibson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2014

It says, the board found no evidence of any mental health problems or symptoms during this period. And then on page 20, it says, Mr. … But if they do know, they're required to act, are they not? If it relates to the claim. If there is an intent to apply for benefits. If the symptoms that are being claimed relate to that.

Oral argument — TIANRUI GROUP CO v. ITC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2011

And for a long period of time, there was a question about whether or not process patents, when the process was made abroad or used abroad and the product was imported into the United States, would fall … Could I make one comment, if I might, Your Honors, on the domestic industry issue? In 1988, the statute was amended.

Oral argument — In Re: US

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2025

statistics and so when it comes down to assuming that the court rejects the blanket idea that 1516 doesn't give the court any disclosure of discretion once we get past that we get into the balancing act … Period.

Oral argument — United States Capitol Police v. OCWR

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2024

Something in the Hoyer letter that reflects the alleged changes that were made during this period where the CBA didn't exist? … And it simply wrote the union out of existence for that period.