Documents

Oral argument — 19-1946_USA v. Gardner

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 13, 2020

The question then is because the government was on notice and did not object, this must be reviewed for plain air. And there are two reasons why the government can't satisfy plain air in this case. … Kokas's initial comments. I don't disagree with there was a change in docketing here. This isn't something that just happened. This has been on the dockets a really long time.

Oral argument — United States v. Tashena Crump

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 19, 2025

Now, the first is that there is no doubt that there was a lot of an air of legitimacy to these businesses, to this business operation. … She does make sales calls during a period of that time. The government had documentary evidence that she served as a telemarketer.

Oral argument — MISC Berhad v. Advanced Polymer Coatings Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2015

I'm sorry, these kinds of acts are the 4.0 chemical attacks. That's correct. That's correct. … those acts relates to things that cannot be caused by a chemical attack.

Oral argument — Orion IP v. Hyundai Motor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2009

But, Counsel, there's nothing clean about that issue, is there? I think it is, Your Honor. I'll be interested in hearing how you clean it up. Okay. … The court never made a comment about it at the time the motion was made. The other side never made a comment about it at the time the motion was made.

Oral argument — Minneapolis Community v. GSA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2010

Because you had to deliver a clean site on November of 1993. … They weren't entitled to a clean site, and therefore they're not entitled to indemnification because a clean site wasn't delivered. The whole concept here was public bodies...

Oral argument — Allen, Jr. v. Environmental Restoration

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 20, 2021

Doesn't that counsel in favor of the five-year limitations period so you would have a uniform nationwide limitations period? Sometimes it would. … The Clean Water Act deals with a permit system. There's two things. The nepotism side of the Clean Water Act deals with a permitting system.

Oral argument — United States v. Ca

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 30, 2018

In a criminal case, maybe I'm influenced by the fact that I came up as a young prosecutor in the early days of the Speedy Trial Act when the Speedy Trial Act was actually taken somewhat seriously. … It's really the 21-month period. I'm interested to know whether you respond to Judge Lentz's comment that any of this delay was intentional on the part of the government or just merely neglectful.

Oral argument — Sandra Shockley v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 20, 2017

Doesn't seem odd, doesn't it, that both of these transactions took place over a three-hour period? … Commissioner in the First Circuit, interpreting the Massachusetts Uniform Fraudulent Transfers Act and the North Carolina Uniform Fraudulent Transfers Act.

Oral argument — Reyna Cruz v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2024

Before I hit on the two points, I wanted to comment about a couple things. The plaintiff never testified there was a puddle. She made it very clear. … Because what you look at is for a constructive notice perspective, was the defendant doing what they should have done to ensure it wasn't there over a significant period of time?

Oral argument — United States v. Jason Bricker

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 31, 2024

McCaul was writing on a clean slate. … So the nonretroactive action by Congress means Congress is at least thinking about this, so it's kind of put the ball in the air and so we can jump in and grab it? Yes.

Oral argument — Ysole Krol v. Teri Kennedy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2020

Well, he could have shot up in the air to scare them, I suppose. … There's no need to wave a gun or shoot in the air.

Oral argument — Rosemary Jensen v. County of Sonoma

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 16, 2011

I want to comment on, first, on the penalty issue that you raised, Your Honor. … And so they are, in effect, being penalized because they didn't clean up.

Oral argument — United States v. Lourdes Garcia

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 27, 2018

If you look at the record and applying the plain air standard and for cumulative air, the... I'm not even talking about the other issues. … I'm not here to argue that defense counsel acts appropriately, your honor.

Oral argument — Orange County Water District v

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2016

You've got a five year period to do that, right? Well, the five year period relates to certain injunctive relief that's contained in the Shell consent decree. … The claim under the Orange County Water District Act is to recover costs.

Oral argument — Village of Crestwood v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2013

The hazardous materials that were emitted into the air were apparently within the limit permitted by the permit they had from the state government. … This was an intentional act. They knew that they were using the groundwater. They did it for 22 years. And these are not my assertions. These are the assertions in the underlying complaints.

Oral argument — People v. Jolly

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2014

Jolly getting new counsel and that's not a clean hearing and Mr. … And when the trial court is denying this it never states that it's the state makes a vague comment that he knows Mr.

Oral argument — United States Liability Insura v. WW Trading Co., Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2020

On the premises, it was leased to WMT for seafood business and WMT's principal hired the contractor to clean up the beans in its warehouse. WMT paid by check, a WMT check, gave it 1099. … It's acting inconsistently and inconsistently with repudiation.

Oral argument — Changji Esquel Textile Co. Ltd. v. Gina Raimondo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 25, 2022

Is there even where Congress has directly ratified the agency's rulemaking during the interim period? … It said under both the EPA's general grant, the Clean Air Act's general grant of authority, which allows us to promulgate rules necessary to carry out the functions of this section.

Oral argument — Arista Networks, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2018

And the statutory purpose is to clean up bad patents. … I'm going to follow my statutory mission to clean up bad patents. And those other doctrines may or may not be as related to that statute.

Oral argument — Dannette Gonzalez v. National Railroad Passenger Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2010

What he says is that Regal's comment and Regal's actions, all that Ms. … At that point, we would have Riegel's comment to her, which clearly was retaliatory whether it was material, he's not talking to her, she says, and Duncan yelling at her all within a three-month time period