Documents

Oral argument — Native Ecosystems Council v. Leanne Marten

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2019

Forests Restoration Act case and not a National Forest Management Act case. … There was a Clean Water Act claim. And then we have a longstanding recreational interest. We go there a lot. We plan to go there more. That's this.

Oral argument — Charles Yeager v. Airbus Group SE

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2022

And here we have Airbus acting as though there was an endorsement deal, but without agreeing to the compensation that General Yeager requested. … There was no minimal time period included in the party's form selection agreement. And in fact, it could have been performed within a year.

Oral argument — Ramirez v. Castro

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 18, 2003

First of all, my colleagues mentioned, too, and, you know, we all act independently. We do not necessarily share the same views. … And there's a healing period as well. There's a healing period in that. I guess the State's concern must be, well, some people, the crimes individually may not be the most serious.

Oral argument — United States v. Howard Dixon

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2020

I mean, you're not asserting he owned or controlled both cars, or I don't know what the point of inclusion of that Ochoa comment was. … That would have been a very, very clean way of showing that he owned it, and we wouldn't be here talking about that. Would it be okay to address the sentencing? Yes. Please.

Oral argument — Space Exploration v. The Boeing Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2008

And here, what we're talking about is a threatened boycott of the government acting as a customer. … Collins' clients acted badly.

Oral argument — United States v. Jazzmin Dailey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2019

Well, and, Your Honor, I think that there has to go through a comment period. And I'll just note that every single court that has considered the issue has said that it's not ambiguous. … They went through a comment period, and in 2008, those guidelines became effective. But if there's no ambiguity, the guideline, this part of it, is just wrong, right?

Oral argument — Guy Rowland v. Kevin Chappell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2017

Now, counsel, let me stop you right there because I appreciate your argument and on a clean slate, it makes sense what you're saying, but it's not a clean slate. … But it was certainly the subject of much talk, of hearings for an extensive period of time prior to that effective date. It was, it's filed the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996.

Oral argument — Supervalu Holdings Inc v. Richard Morris, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2012

And third, there's no evidence in this record of any act by SuperValue at any time that would constitute rejection under Dupree. … The option right belongs to the lessee Supervalue here for the stated period of just 10 years.

Oral argument — Redding Rancheria v. Kenneth Salazar

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2014

Can you enlighten me from your perspective what happened during the comment period of the proposed rule? Were any comments submitted? … That comment period was extended twice, and in October of 2006, they provided another set of proposed regulations for notice and comment.

Oral argument — San Miguel Pure Foods Co. v. Ramar Int'l Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2015

Ramar never, ever, ever objected to the sale of butter, margarine and cheese for a period of over 10 years until it sent a cease and desist letter in 2011. … The district court first entered an order that said, in connection with injunctive relief, magnolia can't be used for anything, period.

Oral argument — United States v. Sid Willis, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2015

You haven't really answered for me Judge Acuda's question about why this isn't, even if you look at the conduct and you're on plain air review, why this, I'm not quite following you. … She gave him the mandatory minimum of 180, but to accurately reflect all of the conduct he had engaged in since his supervised release began, which was just a two-month period.

Oral argument — Martinez-Garcia v. Holder

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2009

Alito Even if you had a right under the Real ID Act for us to review the NACARA denial, why didn't you file a separate petition after the NACARA relief was denied in August of 2008? … So that's a clean matter before the U.S.C.I.S. That's done and over. So what is there left for us to do?

Oral argument — Jackson v. Galaza

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2003

What's your comment on that? That's correct, Your Honor. … And I don't think it's appropriate to comment on that, and even to comment on the cutoff.

Oral argument — AURAFIN-OROAMERICA v. FEDERAL INS. CO.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2006

freshener industry that PESCO infringed upon California Sense air freshener trade dress. … It included coverage for disparaging comments. We don't have that.

Oral argument — Patrick Pierce v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2010

He alleges the contract that says if you stay on and work during this period, at the end of that period, if you don't want to work for us any longer, you can leave, irrespective as to whether or not we … And I agree with your comments, Your Honor.

Oral argument — River Runners v. Alston

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

It just doesn't occur during the entire period. And what we're talking about is whether or not the law requires a wilderness experience to exist throughout the entire period. … With respect to the Concessions Act, counsel for the Park Service cited to you a page in the Excerpts of Record that is actually a response to comments as the necessity determination.

Oral argument — United States v. Anthony Moore

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2014

I think my best argument is that there's no support in the record as to how you pull this number 12 out of the air. Okay. The other factors that we are appealing is the no alcohol factor, condition. … Presumably he's gotten through the period of the need for 12 times a month of testing. I don't know, Your Honor. I don't know what his history has been under supervision.

Oral argument — National Labor Relations Board v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2025

Good morning, Your Honors, and may it please the Court, this is Matthew Earle for Air National Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 439. I'd like to reserve four minutes for rebuttal, please. … They certainly might have an obligation, which is why the board's Mike O'Connor jurisprudence is you act at your peril during this period.

Oral argument — Leever v. Carson City

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2003

This is a Fair Labor Standards Act case. Paula Leever was a canine officer. Son refuted that she put in 28 hours overtime per week and was not compensated at all for it. This violates the FLSA. … You know, you should consider the number of hours we spent, and now you're saying you have to pick it out of thin air.

Oral argument — Jane Sullivan v. University of Washington

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 13, 2023

The ones that we still don't know are the people who have been added since that period of time. That's the disclosure. Correct. … It is not under In re Crawford, but rather to prevent people with whom they disagree from speaking to them outside of the context of an IACUCS meeting public comment period.