Documents

Oral argument — CHICAGO BOARD v. INTL SECURITIES

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2012

The system memory means acts on the algorithm. The system memory means stores those algorithms. … But the district court judge used the time period of the filing for the motion for a separate trial, that date, as a starting date.

Oral argument — +Adenta GMBH v. Orthoarm

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2007

Did he so determine, or did he just act as though he determined it? Well, Your Honor, he did make a decision that... He went ahead with it. Well, he went ahead with it, Your Honor. … I fail to understand how the court can find that somebody signs an affidavit saying, I am the inventor of the subject matter of these patents, subject matter that he observed and commented glowingly on

Oral argument — Ebanks v. Shulkin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2017

And I understand you're complaining only about a limited period of the delay in granting the hearing, but I think it would be helpful to us to have a broader perspective of what the problems are with this … But it would appear from your comment, if this has never happened, that the standard that the Veterans Court is applying is a very restrictive standard, which basically means there's never going to be

Oral argument — Diamond Sawblades v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2020

And so, knowing the year of the period of review, so it's always 12 months, they could determine using that methodology the origin of the remaining residual basket category blades. Mr. … You can say, well, I acted to the best of my ability in supplying this information. The information you have is what I can provide you while acting to the best of my ability.

Oral argument — EASTERN SHAWNEE TRIBE v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 29, 2011

But the reason the status reports have been filed is because the case is not being litigated, and the court simply asks the parties to come back periodically and say, where do things now stand? … And I first want to make a couple of comments about the jurisdictional issue in the district court. Obviously, this is of some import to the court.

Oral argument — Ablan v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2024

I would also just like to make a comment about the so-called emergency. … Act?

Oral argument — COGNEX CORP v. ITC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2012

Period. That's how software is done, right? People sit down and they write the code before it goes on the computer. They think about the idea before they put it on the computer. … Any last comment? If I may address the infringement issues, Your Honor. There are, I think, eight. And just briefly, I won't address them all. Well, I'd be happy to address them all, Your Honor.

Oral argument — SIRF Technology v. ITC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2009

The difference here is that this whole system simply cannot operate, period, without the software and the technology that CERF has embedded in its communication to its customer, and then the customer communication … Just following up on your comment that these briefs have claimed confidentiality even for the related to language in the contract, that seems to be absurd.

Oral argument — Hangartner v. Intel Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 6, 2016

part of the claim says you can have one, if you have one, you're synchronizing the inverters in that logic… Yeah, but the problem is that you added the synchronization language to overcome the prior act … What were his comments consistent with? I can't answer that, Your Honor. I don't have that at my fingertips. Is it in the record, not in our appendix, but is it part of the record of this case?

Oral argument — Astrazeneca LP v. Apotex

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2010

And it says initially during periods of severe asthma and then it sets forth recommended starting doses. And they are all twice a day. … That language was in the prior act. It was people were using it twice a day.

Oral argument — Sango Intl v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2007

Clearly, in this case, the swivel and the nut act to connect gas piping to a gas meter. … Comment that every one of those 86, a piece of pipe can fit into it, paper, thread, paper, thread, seal. Every one of them.

Oral argument — Advanced Magnetic v. Rome Fastener

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2009

Ratling was withdrawn as a technical expert, and that that act alone was the bad faith. And there's no other findings in the opinion to suggest otherwise. … What was the period of the trial at that point? We were two months before trial. His entire involvement in this case lasted two and a half months. But he was the trial attorney.

Oral argument — Google LLC v. Lee

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2019

You should not, because under the appeal that's taken, which is under Section 706 of the Administrative Procedure Act, the analysis is not just whether there was an error by the board below. … Huppenfeld made a comment about the board, that the board found that the images in SONE are generated locally.

Oral argument — In Re Silver Peak Systems, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 6, 2016

Yes, the board comments on Dr. Kenning's deposition testimony. The board's dispositive determination, I think you'll find on JAA-29 and 30, where the board addresses the theory of McCann. Dr. … And I think given the structure of the process of an IPR with the board constrained by statute for completing these in a particular time period, and at least so far it's not in predilection to take its

Oral argument — Bannum Inc v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2009

But it hasn't demonstrated that the contracting officer or the source selection team acted separate and apart from what was required by the solicitation, that it acted inconsistent with the terms of the … Peck links that to the death which occurred during his period of service. That should be sufficient as a matter of law under the correct interpretation of this regulation. Thank you very much.

Oral argument — +Cook Biotech v. Acell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2006

I'd just like to comment on that just very briefly there so you understand that with respect to that, they asserted inversion and replevant accounts against us. … It comes out of the speed act patent, but it was adopted by PRF in the interference proceeding. Finally, with respect to PRF's argument and the SBIR claim, a couple of things.

Oral argument — Fairbanks v. EPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2015

May I finish my comment? Finish the sentence. Okay, thank you. … The fiscal consideration was that sequestration had caused this agency to have a budget shortfall that had to be addressed within that budget period. No, the individualized fiscal consideration.

Oral argument — LUPIN ATLANTIS HOLDINGS v. MYLAN INC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 22, 2013

First, let me respond to a comment by Judge O'Malley about the context in which it sort of smelled a little bit like claim construction in summary judgment. … And this court found that the ITC acted properly in finding infringement in that case.

Oral argument — Graham Engineering v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2007

The 1930 Tariff Act provided for an exportation of articles manufactured or produced. Okay. Then the regulations under that statute required notice from 1930. … I don't mean to flog the history, but 1313A in the 1930 Act, exportation of goods manufactured, it's got the stuff in it.

Oral argument — Bayer CropScience AG v. Dow AgroSciences LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2016

We have a good idea of what it is Bayer would have demanded if Stein had been acting as a straw for Dow. … And it's deferential, the court explained, because the district court lives with the case over a prolonged period of time.