Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
2,676 results
0.24s
Oral argument — In re Custody of C.C.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 23, 2013
And again, at that point, our second argument, which related to the child support, would only be for the interim period when we had overlapping fathers. … One way or the other, that would have gotten cleaned up, and I wouldn't be wasting this court's time on that.
39 min of audioOral argument — Rupp v. Phusion Projects, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 23, 2013
In the Irwin case, the injury was poisoning from toxic clean rooms. The plaintiffs were in Texas and in Arizona. … That we have witnesses in Virginia that can talk about prior acts that he had.
43 min of audioOral argument — People v. Weinke
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 26, 2016
So was the state's attorney acting as her own expert with respect to this woman's medical condition? No, she was not. … I mean, you had a 77- Well, that means she's acting as her own expert. She had a lot on the doctor. She said, I've come to the conclusion.
53 min of audioOral argument — People v. Woodard
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 17, 2019
fact had acted violently toward the defendant earlier in the day? … So that's certainly a meaning that could be attributed to that comment.
29 min of audioOral argument — Commonwealth Edison Company v. Illinois Commerce Commission
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2016
Final decisions of the Commission are appealed directly to this court under the Public Utilities Act itself. Exactly. And doesn't the Public Utilities Act say what I just said it says? … Anything further or final comments? Thank you, Your Honor. Yes, please do. Thank you. Thank you, counsel.
51 min of audioOral argument — JP Morgan Chase Bank v. Bank of New York
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2011
Can you comment on that? Yes, Your Honor. For one thing, Washington Mutual was not a party to that. That argument that Washington Mutual was a necessary party was raised by Mr. … And I think that is the reason that the authorization to join unknown parties is included in the Illinois version of the Uniform Mortgage Foreclosure Act to help clean up title in that respect.
40 min of audioOral argument — Stone v. Mitek Industries, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2013
So at the October 6, 2011, post-trial hearing, the court commented on MITEC's stark position, and the court said, you don't give me much choice. … It worked, even though it might not be the most elegant solution that you might craft if you had a clean sheet of paper. It was their choice.
39 min of audioOral argument — Rush University Medical Center v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 21, 2013
Again, there needs to be a connection between the employment and the injury for it to be compensable under the Act. … I do understand where you're going with that comment, Your Honor. And again, this isn't something that was noted in the earlier history. It's something that was, it could be put out there.
17 min of audioOral argument — People v. Johnson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2020
The state makes one comment and says, oh, he's been paid $20,000 and he didn't look at any of the material. That's the sum and substance of that analysis. … Without a prejudicial versus probative analysis, it's clear air and an injected bias into this trial. Thank you, counsel. May it please the Court? Counsel.
35 min of audioOral argument — Illinois State Treasurer v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2012
This is with the injured workers benefit fund is a remedial aspect of the remedial act of the workers compensation plan. … Any comment? And if you haven't read them, I'm sure it would be kind of difficult.
32 min of audioOral argument — McIntyre v. Balgani
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2017
As I understand it, the parties have, and we've accepted that, agreed format for the time period? Yes, we've come to an agreement. … Judge Shore, I thought he just made an effort to try a very good case and try to keep the issues clean. He said, quote, and this is found in our brief.
54 min of audioOral argument — Smolucha v. PSNERGY, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2025
readings that were taken the final readings that are taken after tuning that occurs at the very end of the uh the chemical reaction before it enters the elbow shaped exhaust stack goes up hits the dilution period … understand this is a de novo review but i agree that it's the appropriate analysis and i would kindly ask this honorable panel to take it into consideration you can't talk about breach without duty an act
47 min of audioOral argument — People v. Villavicencio-Serna
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 25, 2014
Then isn't that a waiver of the air? If you invite playing of all of her statements, can you complain later? They shouldn't have been played. … Because the defense wanted to make reasonable inferences as to coercion and threatening by showing the long periods while the witness was in the room.
54 min of audioOral argument — Smith v. Stone
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 17, 2012
What it does establish, due to the way he acted and the way he walked and talked, he was definitely impaired. … And Judge Wexler indicated that it may have been air, but perhaps not reversible air. It is the whole issue of this lawsuit.
40 min of audioOral argument — Naperville Womens Healthcare v. Siswick
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 27, 2018
There wasn't evidence on every single other asset, other than comments from Dr. Carney saying that these were the assets that the three doctors were using at the time. … There's no authority that says it just evaporated into the thin air. It went somewhere.
43 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2010
Comments on use specifically indicate that it is to be used, because it's not confined just to liability insurance. … Brandt's 29, tender 29, because it was incorrect. 29A, again, is up in the air. So the jury's looking at this, well, who caused her injury? I disagree, Your Honor. You don't think that? No.
52 min of audioOral argument — Naperville Womens Healthcare v. Siswick
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 27, 2018
Other than comments from Dr. Carney stating that these were the assets that the three doctors were using at the time. … There's no authority that says it just evaporated into thin air. It went somewhere.
43 min of audioOral argument — American Coal Company v. The Workers' Compensation Commission
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2018
Wirtz, I should comment, by the way. Yes. When you prepare an appendix, you should really review it first, because you only gave us two pages of the arbitrator's decision. … I just like to breathe the rarefied air. Yes. May it please the Court. Mr. Wirtz, my name is Bruce Wirtz, and I represent Jimmy Boatwright.
28 min of audioOral argument — Spence v. GATX Corporation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 13, 2010
McFedrinan Yes, Your Honor May it please the court, counsel, for the record, my name is Attorney James McFedrinan of the Clean Associates in Peru. … It was sort of an offhand comment.
41 min of audioOral argument — Vicars-Duncan v. Tactikos
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 12, 2014
I think if we looked at the comments that were made by Mr. … Everybody knows people are airing their gripes there. And I still go back to what Judge Little says.
37 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.