Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Richard Berger

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 1, 2009

In period three, the S-1 is filed, including the S-X statements that include the inflated financial information based upon the falsity that started in period one. I'm with you. Okay. … And it said, what I want to do is measure overvaluation so as to follow 2F1.1, comment note 7A of the 1995 guidelines.

Oral argument — National Labor Relations Board v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2025

Good morning, Your Honors, and may it please the Court, this is Matthew Earle for Air National Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 439. I'd like to reserve four minutes for rebuttal, please. … They certainly might have an obligation, which is why the board's Mike O'Connor jurisprudence is you act at your peril during this period.

Oral argument — NAVARRO-SOQUI v. MUKASEY

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2008

But the one for which your client was convicted as a 10-year period. That is correct. So that's bigger, so we can't say that that's a difference. … An act is done knowingly if the defendant is aware of the act and does not act or failed the act through ignorance, mistake or accident.

Oral argument — United States v. Dennis Lam

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2009

One is that the jury was properly instructed, although – I was thinking about your first comment. … Okay, Josiah, you must have some air.

Oral argument — United States v. Vickie Dykman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2009

And conversion, there's got to be some sort of transitory act proved by either circumstantial or direct evidence that you took it. … Dyckman, during cross-examination, there was a clean slate when she started at the Harrison Post Office in 1991. My question is, did somebody sit down and count the stamps?

Oral argument — Trujillo v. US Postal Service

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2008

It was primarily substance abuse and the need for him to enter a rehabilitation program to become clean and sober. … , I mean the Rehabilitation Act or the ADA.

Oral argument — VILLAREAL v. ALAMEIDA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 21, 2005

that point We think that's about the strongest statement that can be made as to the importance of his testimony And the weakness of their case outside of his testimony Within that six and a half year period … help In locating the person Rather than making a formal criminal accusation At that point And it's our position that Particularly under the cases that we have cited That the husband's statement And his act

Oral argument — United States v. Williams

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2006

takes a check and doesn't come in and clean the house, she probably owed you a duty of honest services, at least to that level of honesty, of coming in and doing some cleaning. … But on key points like this, he acted with certainty. The jury saw that tape. The jury was loud.

Oral argument — Kimani v. Gonzales

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2007

That effective date provision says that the Act shall take effect 120 days after the date of the enactment of the Act. That's where we get the February 27 date. … Why wouldn't, even if we're writing a clean slate, why wouldn't the BIA's interpretation be entitled to Chevron deference at this juncture?

Oral argument — in re: UPS "Air-In-Ground" Mktg & SPL

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2013

Okay, so two comments in response to that. … As I said at the beginning, any issue that this might be misleading or deceptive, this is not a Consumer Protection Act claim.

Oral argument — Guy Rowland v. Kevin Chappell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2017

Now, counsel, let me stop you right there because I appreciate your argument and on a clean slate, it makes sense what you're saying, but it's not a clean slate. … But it was certainly the subject of much talk, of hearings for an extensive period of time prior to that effective date. It was, it's filed the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996.

Oral argument — Friends of Oceano Dunes v. John Ainsworth

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 24, 2019

60-day limitation period also governs a claim arising under the ESA well I believe that any action in state court challenging an action of the committee issues many lawsuits a court challenging the action … district we have the state air resources board involved and the county of San Luis anything that protects the plover and if the district court were to decide the federal endangered species act they wouldn't

Oral argument — Tesla Motors, Inc. v. Cristina Balan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2024

Bazzieri, that the district court, the Western District of Washington, aired when they closed balance 2019 libel claim. And that libel claim was only against Tesla. It wasn't against Musk. … And so I don't see how you now can pretend, well, it should have been a stay, so we'll act as if it is a stay. It isn't a stay. It's a dismissal. The case is over.

Oral argument — United States v. Anthony Moore

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2014

I think my best argument is that there's no support in the record as to how you pull this number 12 out of the air. Okay. The other factors that we are appealing is the no alcohol factor, condition. … Presumably he's gotten through the period of the need for 12 times a month of testing. I don't know, Your Honor. I don't know what his history has been under supervision.

Oral argument — Space Exploration v. The Boeing Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2008

And here, what we're talking about is a threatened boycott of the government acting as a customer. … Collins' clients acted badly.

Oral argument — Ramirez v. Castro

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 18, 2003

First of all, my colleagues mentioned, too, and, you know, we all act independently. We do not necessarily share the same views. … And there's a healing period as well. There's a healing period in that. I guess the State's concern must be, well, some people, the crimes individually may not be the most serious.

Oral argument — United States v. Howard Dixon

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2020

I mean, you're not asserting he owned or controlled both cars, or I don't know what the point of inclusion of that Ochoa comment was. … That would have been a very, very clean way of showing that he owned it, and we wouldn't be here talking about that. Would it be okay to address the sentencing? Yes. Please.

Oral argument — Ysaul Flores Peralta v. Merrick Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 16, 2021

The IJ then never commented further. … The BIA can review factual findings, but it has to do so under clear air.

Oral argument — United States v. Isidro Hernandez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2013

So we're on a plain air review. We are on plain air review, Your Honor. What difference did it make? Well, of course, it made a difference in terms of the sentence he received. … And in this case, there was an objection to what the government's comments.

Oral argument — United States v. America Aguilar-Reyes

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2020

And that's subject to a plain air review. And there's just no facts in the record to support that any due process violation occurred with the 2012 expedited removal. … What is your response to the government's comment that the UBISA in this case, the facts that she wants to rely on here occurred in a different time period at a time when she had LPR status and that somehow