Documents

Oral argument — Texas v. Travis County, Texas

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2018

and the constitutional standing is met by the harm posed by the imminent litigation Counsel, what do we do with the fact that commentators esteemed commentators such as Wright and Miller have read franchise … The state's alleged injury turns on the legal consequences of some act that may or may not occur. We have to look at the date when the lawsuit was filed.

Oral argument — Newsom v. Reliance Stnrd Life Ins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2021

When the judge acts as the fact finder, Rule 52 applies. … He commented, and this was against Chavez v.

Oral argument — United States v. Campos-Ayala

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2022

And he's, he, he, he's not acting, they don't see him selling, right? He's just standing on a corner. … And we're sitting here as an en banc court, and we often comment on jury instruction. We don't often, but we do from time to time. Do you have a comment on that?

Oral argument — Harris v. Clay County, MS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2022

Harris or why he was detained this period of time. He was detained because the court did not do the job, because the prosecutor did not do the job. And again, I emphasize that both Mr. Lutt, Mr. … this for so many years, along with Laddick Huffman, they run into the issue of, all right, well, maybe we don't have somebody who's going to necessarily force us to continue with this unconstitutional act

Oral argument — State of Missouri v. Biden

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 10, 2023

Do you have any comment on that? I have several comments on that, Your Honor. I'd like to comment both directly on the materials that you're talking about and also about their relationship. … The FBI said no comment. In the record, it's clear the reason the FBI said no comment was that the fact of that investigation was not public and the FBI doesn't comment on public investigations.

Oral argument — USA v. City of Dallas, Texas

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 27, 2016

There are several comments that were made. But again, this is strictly about were these allegations publicly disclosed and are relators the original sources for them? … For the first three of those, the Walker case, the report card, and the public budget and housing documents, those documents do refer to the city's failure to affirm the furthering over a period of years

Oral argument — McLemore v. Lumen Technologies

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2026

Um, this is the exact case that the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act was designed to prevent from proceeding beyond the pleading stage. … No government agency, either before, during, or after the class period, has determined that lead-sheet cables pose significant health and environmental risks to the general public.

Oral argument — United States v. Valas

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2022

I'd also like to address the court's comment that trial counsel did not submit a proposed jury instruction. … For the sex act? Yes. Well, she was apprehended some days after this. There was a sane exam that was done. She had multiple sexual relations during a relatively short period of time.

Oral argument — Marfil v. City of New Braunfels, Texas

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 3, 2025

In Nekrolov, the court said legislative acts are subject to rational basis review. … It's telling that there are 748 short-term rentals in New Braunfels, and over a 10-year period, they cannot point to a single citation for a single confirmed nuisance at a short-term home.

Oral argument — Republican Natl Cmte v. Wetzel

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2024

And again, you know, no comment about that. … This is not a Voting Rights Act context where the courts are applying Voting Rights Act under Section 2 or Section 5 where they're enforcing the 14th or 15th Amendment.

Oral argument — Cynthia Heinsohn v. Carabin & Shaw, P.C.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2015

And then you get a denial, and you get a notice of a denial, and then there's a particular period of time within which you can appeal that decision. Yes, sir. … Just the comments about – by George Escobedo asking – she would ask George, will I have a job when I come back? And he would make a joke out of it. Is that animus? I don't know.

Oral argument — Abraham Watkins v. Festeryga

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 22, 2025

So in such a case, this court is precluded from reviewing the order of remand, period. Now about a paragraph below, the court has explained its reasoning for why there is no review. … Yeah, I mean, I mean, honestly, that's how I read it in that jurisdiction, just a throwaway comment at the end. I don't know what it means. Well, that might be.

Oral argument — Munck Wilson Mandala v. Jordan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2024

My father told me, and I never really understood this comment, maybe until this morning when I thought about it. He said to me often, stop making everything a federal case. … To believe them, the underlying acts were specific fraud acts sufficient to meet 9b. Of great importance, since they want to guide you to their belated RICO case statement, Mr.

Oral argument — Briar Capital Working Fund v. Remmert

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2023

Once these rights came into the bankruptcy estate, they could be sold, period. Obviously, the district court, Judge Hanks had a different view of it, and again, it went back to a standing issue. … You're essentially acting in the same capacity as the trustee to obtain a recovery.

Oral argument — Schweizer v. Canon

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2021

This case has to do with Trade Agreement Act, as well as Price Reduction Clause. … And during that entire time period, certainly from 2009 forward, Cannon was involved as the parent, if you will, or the acquiring entity of OSE. And the government knew that.

Oral argument — Daniel Valderaz v. Lubbock County Hospital Dist.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2015

He had complained about, about a four-month period of time of conduct by the nurses where they were just making derogatory remarks, um, you know. And he complained about that. Yes, sir. … And I think it's more stringent in this circuit than a lot of circuits that before you hold a employee responsible for retaliatory act, you've got to show it is by a supervisor, not by a co-worker.

Oral argument — United States v. Le

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2024

And then, further, the comment to the for the purpose of part of the prong of the enhancement is given. But the maintained is never mentioned. … Lee were acting in concert. I mean, they were hand in glove. Clearly, Mr. Lee used the motorcycle shop himself.

Oral argument — Morash v. Val Ridge Roofing

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2022

It occurred throughout the whole period. What's happening? Oh, nothing, la, la, la. … We can't comment on that.

Oral argument — Roswitha Saenz v. City of El Paso

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 29, 2016

But he never acted alone. He always acted in close coordination with the El Paso Police Department. He considered Officer Flores, who was a police officer at the time, as his supervisor. … They were reviewed without comment. That's about all I can say. Thank you. Thank you. Mr. Ortega.

Oral argument — Delek Refining, Limited v. Local 202, Untd Steel

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2018

Transportation Workers, that says an arbitrator acts contrary to the CBA when he disregards the plain or ambiguous provisions. … It doesn't say the company shall have the exclusive right to subcontracting, period, like some of the earlier cases that overruled the arbitration awards. Here, there were exceptions. Kennedy.