Documents

Oral argument — Rodriguez v. DVA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2007

Does your argument depend in any degree on the period of time during which Green, Carpenter, and Winko were in effect? … The interpretation that changed this regulation to 2.2 was issued without notice of comment to the direct final rule. The reason that was valid is because it was an interpretive court.

Oral argument — BENNETT MARINE, INC v. LENCO MARINE

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2013

As you're aware, this dispute is over automatic movement of trim tabs affixed to the hull of a boat, and in my first period of speaking, I'd like to talk about the Court's claim construction, infringement … Gayle's comments regarding all of these possible... That's because it's hooked up to the tachometer.

Oral argument — In Re Schweickert

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2016

And now I'd like you to just comment on any of that reasoning by the PTO. … But what Burrell teaches is that in order to provide somebody the ability to rewind, then you do not want to overwrite a certain period, a certain portion of that data.

Oral argument — IN RE HUBBELL

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 13, 2012

As to the terminal disclaimers, as Your Honor said, you know, the CREATE Act was to cover specific situations which they don't meet. … We then languished at the patent office for some period of time. We had a priority issue that was dismissed, and then the civil patenting issue arose.

Oral argument — Best Key Textiles Co. Ltd. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2016

The only thing that happened here is this court said, CIT, you don't have jurisdiction over this case under your limited grant of jurisdiction, period, the end. … They're going to write Section 625C out of the act. That's where this case comes from. 20 years ago, Congress said before you get rid of a customs ruling, you need notice, comment, publication.

Oral argument — Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2014

And changing, and it was a specific deliberate change from the 2003 Act to the 2006 Act, from may to shall. … One final comment, because we're way over.

Oral argument — ScentSational Technologies v. PepsiCo, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2019

In that period from September 20th through to November 16th when it was finally terminated, there was a series of emails back and forth between the parties. … A brief comment on our damages expert. It was said that he had no methodology, but in his deposition he identified the methodology that they used. It was said that he relied only on Dr.

Oral argument — Amini Innovation v. Anthony Calif

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2007

Is that how I should interpret the third factor with this knockoff comment? I believe so. … Well, I know under the Copyright Act, it was more... It was knowing copying. But you're talking about patent now. Yeah. Well, I'm talking about both, actually.

Oral argument — Cellco Partnership v. Broadcom Corp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2007

There's no case in 70 years under the Declaratory Judgment Act that finds that to be the case. … May it please the court, Michael Page for a broad comment.

Oral argument — CAO Group, Inc. v. Biolase Technology, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2017

And they argued that it also could act as an optical waveguide for a limited period of time. … I think I'd like to begin my argument by addressing Judge Moore's comments regarding the motivation to combine. At least one of you will. Go ahead. LaserSmile and Pottinger.

Oral argument — POZEN v. PAR PHARMA

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2012

I would have acted anyway. Well, here's the problem with that. … Now, in fact, on August the 23rd, 2010, we received no comment from our counsel. They said it was in September that it was withdrawn?

Oral argument — Harari v. Hollmer

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2010

Yes, because there's another issue with… I just want… If I could just answer the… You mentioned that they could have done it, if I understood the comment correctly. … And so this went through the examining process as entire continuations, including the examiner who examined for purposes of the interference before the motion period began.

Oral argument — Hinton v. HHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2025

The medical records that were made during the rehab period. No. … I don't comment on that, and I'm not speculating as to that.

Oral argument — Kim Laube & Company, Inc. v. Wahl Clipper Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2015

So could you comment on that before you begin your argument on the merits? That goes primarily to the trade secret. … And, in fact, we had made some clippers during the joint ownership period for a wall that were branded by wall, sold by wall, but incorporated this technology.

Oral argument — In Re Magnum Oil Tools International

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2016

Is your position or your reserving comment that the director, if the other side doesn't appeal, could come in and say that my board got it wrong? No. … And then on top of that, now we have the intervener stepping in in a case acting as both where the board made the decision to institute, they made the final decision with respect to invalidity, and now

Oral argument — +Monsanto Co v. McFarling

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2007

McFarling never acted in bad faith, that all of his conduct during the course of this litigation was in good faith. … Some of her comments in connection with denying the modification seem to me to suggest perhaps an inclination in that direction.

Oral argument — ASTRAZENECA PHARM v. ANCHEN PHARM

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2013

It's telling- I thought the problem in the solution in the claims was creating a suspended release, i.e. a long-acting version of- Yes, a sustained release. Quetiapine? How do you say it? Quetiapine. … A few comments about secondary considerations, which the court found to exist in this case and as supporting a conclusion of non-obviousness.

Oral argument — Canadian Lumber Trade v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2007

My comments are really important. At some point, I hope somebody will get to the merits of the case, but sooner or later. Absolutely. … Your argument ought to be we didn't brief them, period. I was responding to a question. But you have no position on it.

Oral argument — Petite v. McDonough

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2024

This young lady then was agreed to accept the consortium's appointment of counsel and I raised the TRICARE issue of the entitlement to benefits through that entire period. … Petit said that terminating benefits at age 18 for non-students and age 23 for students was unfair and outdated because it didn't track with other laws such as the Affordable Care Act.

Oral argument — CHICAGO BOARD v. INTL SECURITIES

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2012

The system memory means acts on the algorithm. The system memory means stores those algorithms. … But the district court judge used the time period of the filing for the motion for a separate trial, that date, as a starting date.