Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filters2004

10,000+ results

0.23s

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Edward Allyn Hudacko, Petitioner v. Regents of the University of California, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 26, 2026

    Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510, 534-535 (1925); Meyer, 262 U.S. at 399-400. … Hecox, Docket No. 24-38, 104 F.4th 1061 (9th Cir. 2023); West Virginia v. B.P.J., Docket No. 24-43, 98 F.4th 542 (4th Cir. 2024).

  • Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions

    Federal Register · Notice · Dec 16, 2021

    CAPRIKAT LIMITED, Akara Building, 24 Castro Street, Wickhams Cay 1, P.O. … ALBERTINE DRC S.A.S.U), Akara Building, 24 Castro Street, Wickhams Cay 1, P.O.

    86 FR 71546Treasury DepartmentForeign Assets Control Office
  • Interim Decision 4E1396

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    Decision *1396 October 24, 1962. … Dec. 399. That case involved false statements in an application for a United States passport.

    Executive Office for Immigration Review
  • Prologue — Sisson v. Preister

    Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 2006

    Barriteau, 399 A.2d 563 UR UP cde ed eT or ar de ae 12 Doe v. Binker, 492 A.2d 857 (D.C. 1985) Edmund J. Flynn Co. v. LaVay, 431 A.2d 543 a i EEG Gs he ha GAs ede a 26 Fitzgerald v. … Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 399 (1966)............ 30 Hackney v. Morelite Construction, D.C. Corp., 418 A.2d 1062 (D.C. 1980) Lloward Univ. v. Lacy, 828 A.2d 733 (D.C. 2003)......... 27 Huyhes v.

    546 U.S. 1215
  • Reply Brief — Save Palisade Fruitlands v. Todd

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2002

    NLRB, No. 01-518, 2002 WL 1357297, at *6 (U.S., June 24, 2002) (the right to petition is one of the most precious of the liberties safeguarded by the Bill of Rights). … Kolodziejski, 399 U.S. 204 (1970) (persons who are not owners of property may not be barred from voting in a bond referendum); Cipriano v.

    537 U.S. 814
  • Brief for Appellant — Robert W. Blanchette et al., v. Connecticut General Insurance Corp.

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for Appellant · 1974

    Supp. 2d 24, cert. denied sub nom. Port Authority Trans-Hudson v. … New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 U.S. 992, 428 (1970).

    419 U.S. 102
  • Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — United States v. John Barth Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1929

    ¢ “Matutes Revenue Act of 918 Act of Peh 24 1s 18 40 Seat t Sex ‘a s 4 a t 4 jt Sec. 2M id 18 Revenue Act af 192), Act of Nev 24, 192) i%¢, 42 Stat Sex 2M d 14 Revenue Act of 1924, Act of June 2 … Act of Feb. 24, 1919. (40 Btat. L. 1057-96, C. 18.)

    279 U.S. 370
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Fellers v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

    Ct. 1602 (1966) ....... 2, 3, 4, 5, 13, 14, 21, 24, 29 Moran v. Burbine, 475 U. S. 412, 89 L. Ed. 2d 410, EE ne me 14, 24, 26 Nardone v. United States, 308 U. S. 338, 84 L. … /d., at 399.

    540 U.S. 519
  • Opposition Brief — Smith v. Baker

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1972

    U.S. at 399, note. … New Maven In- clusion Cases, 399 U.S. 392 (1970).

    409 U.S. 890
  • Safety Zone: Vessel Removal From the Oakland Estuary, Alameda, CA

    Federal Register · Rule · Nov 18, 2013

    Coast Guard Sector San Francisco; telephone (415) 399-3585 or email at D11-PF-MarineEvents@uscg.mil. … Persons and vessels may request permission to enter the safety zone on VHF-23A or through the 24-hour Command Center at telephone (415) 399-3547. Dated: October 28, 2013. Gregory G.

    78 FR 68995Homeland Security DepartmentCoast Guard
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — National Credit Union Admin. v. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998

    Clarke, 479 U.S. at 399-400 (citing Invest- ment Co. Institute v. Camp, 401 U.S, 617 (1971)). … See Clarke, 479 U.S. at 399 (quoting Block, 467 U.S. at 347).

    522 U.S. 479
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Gerstein v. Pugh

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975

    Alabama, : 399 UsSs 1 (1970). scccvccnccvee 71°58 Cooltdge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443 (1970)...sce00- << 9 Sage APS gh ii Dresner v. … The Court's conclusion that "...an eight day (24 hours for initial ap- pearance plus seven days) deprivation of liberty is not reasonable..." (App. 111) is clearly erroneous under Rule 5(c).

    420 U.S. 103
  • Petitioners Brief — Lewis v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1996

    Swenson, 397 U.S. 436 (1970) ...........6555. 24 Baldwin v. New York, 399 U.S. 66 GOODE + 0.00 secccccsacecsceseeseees 5, 8, 12, 18, 19, 20 Blanton v. … L.R. 917, 923-24 (1926).

    518 U.S. 322
  • Appellees Brief — Boston & C. Mining Co. v. Montana Ore Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Appellees Brief · 1903

    Rep. 399. … of the proposition that the jurisdiction of the United States Court is limited, and that the more recent statutes passed with reference to its jerisdiction had the purpose of circumscribing and —24

    188 U.S. 632
  • Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. Transamerica Corp.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1953

    After full administrative proceedings, * the ¥ ay original complaint was issued on June 24, 1948 (R. 1-19). ’ Extensive hearings were held before a member of the Board as hearing officer, the hearing … Ten (c), R. 399). The Board concluded that Trans- america had the ‘‘purpose and the power’’ to con- tinue to acquire additional banks (ibid.; Par.

    346 U.S. 901
  • Petition for Rehearing — Garrow v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Rehearing · 1943

    Rogers 257 Fed. 8 C.C.A. 397, 399, —* 255 U.S. 163; Olson v. U.S. 292 U.S. 246, 54. … Further confirmations in the Act are noted in Petitioners original brief, pages 28, 24, e.g. the em- ployment of the same terms “use” and “vest” as to both the rights of the United States in the land

    318 U.S. 765
  • Respondents Brief — Argersinger v. Hamlin

    Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1972

    Illinois, . 22 399 U.S. 235 (1970) Winters v. Beck, 10,17 D.C.Ark. 1968, 281 F.Supp 793 Wooley v. … New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970), in determining when the Sixth Amendment right to trial by jury was required.

    407 U.S. 25
  • Opposition Brief — Bennett v. International Bank of Miami, N. A.

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1988

    The Judgment Below is Consistent with Every Other Case Addressing §24, Fifth of the National Bank Act ............ B. … App. 237, 399 N.W.2d 484 (1986) (interpreting Federal Home Loan Bank Board-mandated bylaw, 12 C.F.R. $544.5, by reference to 12 U.S.C. §24, Fifth); Roy v.

    485 U.S. 988
  • Reply Brief — Reuters Ltd. v. Tax Appeals Tribunal

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1994

    Pet. at 24-25. … Pet. at 24-25.

    512 U.S. 1235
  • Procedures in Regulating and Enforcing Unfair or Deceptive Practices

    Federal Register · Rule · Jul 1, 2026

    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 399 Airfare advertising, Consumer protection, Rulemaking proceedings, Unfair or deceptive practices. … For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Department of Transportation amends 14 CFR part 399 as follows: PART 399—STATEMENTS OF GENERAL POLICY 1.

    91 FR 39872Transportation DepartmentOffice of the Secretary

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.