Documents

Oral argument — In Re Semcrude

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 21, 2013

But the issues were raised, and his comments were true in the plan. But did he ever have a chance to have them dealt with? … What we're not, what we are trying to understand is what does it mean in the context of this specific act, in this specific bankruptcy?

Oral argument — John Doe v. Princeton Univ

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 10, 2021

And in the preceding paragraphs, it goes into great detail about what the comments were and that the female accuser was telling plaintiff that she was going to use instances in which they had consensual … Well, he was never advised that he had the opportunity to file a formal Title IX complaint for those set of incidents and conduct that occurred in that summertime period.

Oral argument — USAv.Shavers

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 21, 2012

Well, the most substantive comment that the district court made about what happened was that the prejudice was significant, and the district court lamented that Ms. … What's the effect of the time period? There was mention that it was 75 minutes later. I mean, they bring up a point. I mean, do the jurors let that sink in for a while?

Oral argument — Blystone v. Horn Part1

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2011

Blystone acted in reliance upon that defective advice. When we're talking about Mr. Whitecoe's background, he testified in the PCRA hearing that he had never attended any capital seminars. … With respect to newly discovered evidence, they've set forth a one-year time period. Counsel is within that one-year period.

Oral argument — Yusupo v. V.Atty Gen USA.part1

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 16, 2010

on them, and he's not associated with any individual who is an extremist or acts on extremism. … I'll let them comment on that. Is there, on this subject, the IJ seems to have been most impressed by what she regarded as a material omission in testifying about funds sent to the brother.

Oral argument — Heffner v. Murphy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2013

They are only for the purpose of inspecting for the enforcement of the act. … The Audit Committee said that it was a product of the staff, but it went to a public hearing, and the State Board of Funeral Directors were permitted to comment.

Oral argument — Romerovs Allstate Ins Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

We also know that there was a decision made by Allstate shortly after the initiation of the program to prevent any rehires into any position at Allstate for at least a year, because any rehire in that period … Now, what's unusual about this, and Judge Jordan, you commented on it earlier, this isn't a case where in a decisional unit we had a riff where we took out 10%.

Oral argument — United States v. Bond Rehearing Part1

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 16, 2013

It's a political act. … Period. I think that's a statement of historical fact. It is not a forfeiture of a legal position.

Oral argument — In Re The Majestic Star Casino

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 21, 2013

Well, I mean, I would say to that, you know, if this were a circumstance where you perceived that the shareholder were acting in order to collect on a prepetition debt, then there are remedies that the … Well, you've taken away a certain amount of money away from creditors, from the standpoint that that was virtue of the loss of the NSC, and created a damage, specifically in the amount of taxes for the period

Oral argument — Atlas Data Privacy v. Weinform

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2025

Newspapers don't have to recall those if they've already been printed during the notice period. … And that's what sets this apart from things like HIPAA or the Video Privacy Protection Act.

Oral argument — Fry v. Atty Gen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

I don't want to comment on it, Your Honor. It seems rather aggressive. We're just talking about there's something more going on here than pops off the face of the record. I don't know what it was. … He does come back within 60 days, but beyond the 15 days, and within that 60-day period, the rules of justice are turning here, his claim is denied because there's no additional evidence.

Oral argument — Inre One2One Communications LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 29, 2014

The fact that a 14-day period is required for taking an appeal. If that's the jurisdictional limit, then that's when the Congress is determined they can do that. … As far as comments about reliance and third parties. Do you believe it's been misapplied then? Excuse me? I suppose then you believe it's been misapplied.

Oral argument — Langbord v. US Dept Treasury_En Banc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 14, 2015

as the sovereign, we're acting as a property owner. … No, that's our disagreement, Your Honor, which is that it's the difference between the government acting as law enforcer and acting in a second manner as property owner.

Oral argument — 22-3426_New Concepts v. NLRB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 28, 2023

And frankly, that's the way everybody acted to split the hair. You can't stop paying dues and not effectively have resigned from the union. Right, right, in that setting. … They made no adverse comment, and they considered it. But it's made jurisdictional, so we have to consider whether or not these things were properly raised.

Oral argument — Natl Shooting Sports Fndtn v. Atty Gen NJ

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2023

The bringing of the act is itself a violation of 7902, which says you can't bring the act. And when you have that, that's just a very straightforward 1983 suit. It's the state. … It says you just can't bring one, period. And then when you have a statute that says that, I don't see how it's different from a statute that says you can't discriminate against.

Oral argument — 19-3774_USA v. Kousisis_Alpha Painting

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 18, 2021

And if PennDOT had found out, for example, that Marqueas was not acting as a regular dealer, that it was acting arguably as a broker or perhaps as a near pass-through, what would have happened is they … PennDOT wasn't acting as a government entity in this regard.