Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Jamaal Bomber

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2016

The statement is Bomber drove girls to arrange locations where they performed sexual acts for money. … And I'm going to just ask you to assume that factual last comment. I'm not going to the facts of the case.

Oral argument — Ricardo Machuca v. Mike McDonald

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2012

Eric said the blood was on his clothing and he helped to clean him up. And Wes said that the blood, he could see the injury on his hand. … I think that question is up in the air, at least slightly at this point, Your Honor. I'd like to agree with you and say that after Harrington v.

Oral argument — John Doe v. Edmund Brown, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 17, 2011

Because the Court isn't writing on a clean slate. Well, but what facts were wrong? What fact was wrong? That's your burden. … Your Honor, the State just made a critical comment. Counsel, if you don't mind, for the record, just in case. I apologize, Your Honor.

Oral argument — United States v. Carsten Rosenow

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2021

They did that three It's important, I think that seizures or preservation requests are permitted for a 90 day period under 2703. This was done in one 90 day period. … And the district court in that case found as a factual matter that he acted with an expectation of a reward.

Oral argument — United States v. D.R.L

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2003

There was a comment in one about the victim. … He was ordered, committed to the custody of the Attorney General until the age of 21, so a period of about 7 years.

Oral argument — Simpson v. Burkhart

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2008

Because by making that determination, Your Honor, you're saying you've got to have a death benefit or it's not exempt, period. … The standard review said the standard review is clear air for the question here. I don't, well, I don't think it's a clear air per se.

Oral argument — Summers v. Schriro

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2006

And Congress was no doubt mindful of this when they adopted the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act. … But ---- and also the Arizona characterization of this as collateral is also up in the air. And ---- Well, in light of Ward, I'm not sure it is up in the air.

Oral argument — United States v. John Vescuso

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 10, 2019

He needed to get the lot cleaned up. Mr. Vescuso showed up and said, oh, I'll buy this stuff from you and take it off your hands. It was all Mr. Vescuso's idea. It was all Mr. … I must say I've never seen in my 23 years on the bench agents act the way these agents did.

Oral argument — In re: RS Air, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 25, 2023

On the other hand, aren't you eviscerating the corporate discharge, which Congress since it, you know, the act became the code in 1978? Well, I don't think so. … The discharge of a debtor does not affect the liability of any other party on that discharge debt, period.

Oral argument — Huynh v. Mukasey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2008

The Smith case basically says that petitioner's petition, which was filed June 10, 2005, was within the 30-day period of filing post Real ID Act of 2005. … That case, the BIA had made its decision in late 2005, outside of the 30-day period post real ID.

Oral argument — Huynh / Nguyen v. Mukasey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2008

The Smith case basically says that petitioner's petition, which was filed June 10, 2005, was within the 30-day period of filing post Real ID Act of 2005. Right. … At that case, the BIA had made its decision in late 2005, outside of the 30-day period post real ID.

Oral argument — United States v. Myron Motley

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 12, 2009

They have the authority to act. They did not act. … And that's the period of time you have to account for.

Oral argument — San Miguel Pure Foods Co. v. Ramar Int'l Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2015

Ramar never, ever, ever objected to the sale of butter, margarine and cheese for a period of over 10 years until it sent a cease and desist letter in 2011. … The district court first entered an order that said, in connection with injunctive relief, magnolia can't be used for anything, period.

Oral argument — Smith v. Salish

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2004

And if you were to determine that none of the exceptions applied, wouldn't that be a clean way to determine that there is no tribal court jurisdiction? Right. That's how we see the law. … And referring to your brief page 17, you note that the college might receive funding as a tribal college under the Tribally Controlled Community College Assistance Act, which is a federal act.

Oral argument — United States v. Bojorquez-Rojo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2005

There was this period of two months where she had not been paying on the rent, and she was moving out over a slow period of time. … So it's more than just her mere presence the officers were acting upon.

Oral argument — Redding Rancheria v. Kenneth Salazar

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2014

Can you enlighten me from your perspective what happened during the comment period of the proposed rule? Were any comments submitted? … That comment period was extended twice, and in October of 2006, they provided another set of proposed regulations for notice and comment.

Oral argument — MedCath Empl. Health Care Plan v. Dustin Stratton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 14, 2017

The state didn't follow it closely, but they're not following it clean. … Under Arizona law, they have a period of time to open an estate as an interested party with an assigned claim from the estate.

Oral argument — Direct Focus Inc. v. Admiral Insurance

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2003

So what are the predicate acts for the loss – for this known loss? The predicate acts – What is it that kicks in the known loss doctrine here? … The record is actually silent as to when the 1997 ads were taken off the air. The record does support that they weren't taken off the air immediately in response to the cease and desist letter.

Oral argument — United States v. Williams

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2006

takes a check and doesn't come in and clean the house, she probably owed you a duty of honest services, at least to that level of honesty, of coming in and doing some cleaning. … But on key points like this, he acted with certainty. The jury saw that tape. The jury was loud.

Oral argument — Idrisa Sesay v. Michael Chertoff

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2009

Is it because of a deliberate bad faith act by Mr. Sesay? And as I pointed out in my briefs, if Mr. … He's come clean from that day. On the advice of counsel, he has entered an asylum claim.