Documents

Oral argument — RDNJ Trowbridge v. Chesapeake

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 30, 2022

I believe they had 60 days, and the notice period, which is a typical amount of time, the notice period, the notice process, I think, worked well in having about, again, I think it was 273 opt-outs, I … Sells' comment about the opt-outs and the prior opt-outs in the Demcheck settlement. Some 20% of that class exercised the right to exclude themselves by 2016. And both Mr.

Oral argument — Siders v. City of Brandon

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2024

Oh, it would be, all right, even though he's acting . . . excuse me, I apologize on your answering. … This is solely for a limited period of time and you have all of these alternative channels to reach the same target audience.

Oral argument — Demetrius Smith v. Lorie Davis, Director

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2019

So that doesn't seem to be commenting on the death penalty. I think it could be either or, Your Honor. … However, the Rules Enabling Act, and then Gonzalez v. Crosby, the Supreme Court holds that the COA requirement is jurisdictional.

Oral argument — Little v. Doguet

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2022

The 15th JDC acted en banc to rescind the bail schedule. … Under the 2021 revisions, perhaps so, although the comments are not clear.

Oral argument — United States v. David Anderton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2018

Well, but he only, but how many resided over the course of this period of time? The record is not exactly clear on that. … Do you want to comment on that? You already said you agree that if Anderton's right, it is a render, but you haven't said whether you agree that he's right. Your Honor, yes, certainly.

Oral argument — Bustamante-Leiva v. Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2023

We have anonymous phone calls and text messages over a period of two days. It simply does not compel a finding of past persecution. … Particularly when they're anonymous, you have no way of knowing if they can act on those threats.

Oral argument — Jones v. AT&T

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2025

Now, I wanted to comment real quickly before I run out of time about the Court's conclusions about bad faith. You know, based, I guess, largely on Mr. … However, based on the fact that the statute specifically refers to discretion, the Fifth whether or not the planned administrator acted in bad faith.

Oral argument — MM Steel, L.P. v. Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co., e

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 31, 2015

Nucor's position has always been the same towards MM throughout the time period. And the horizontal conspiracy started allegedly on September 8th. … My final comment was simply, viasis, viasis, viasis. It says that the ultimatum is not enough.

Oral argument — Darrin Hill v. New Orleans City

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2017

A municipality cannot conspire with itself any more than a private individual can in the acts of the employees or the acts of the municipality. … So do you have any comments on the whole clearly established concept as it relates to Wagaspak?

Oral argument — Marshall Hunn v. Dan Wilson Homes Incorporated, et

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2014

But second, there was a long period of testimony, and like I said, it's in some pages of the brief. I don't know which page it is. There it is. … It is true that the Texas Supreme Court has expanded the Covenants Not to Compete Act. That is absolutely true.

Oral argument — United States v. Gaspar-Felipe

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 26, 2021

Well, you only, as a defendant, you act through your agents being the attorneys. Prior to trial in this case, Mr. … One more comment. Just to speak on the efforts that were not made by the government on the Confrontation Clause issue.

Oral argument — United States v. Lowe

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2025

Distribution means any act regarding the transfer of material to somebody else. It doesn't include mere solicitation. … I've been in many other cases where the judge has made comments about how bad my client was and yet the sentence wasn't life.

Oral argument — Transverse, L.L.C. v. Iowa Wireless Services, L.L.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2020

Invoices from over an eight-year period then identified services that would have been necessary to defend the TTLA claim only. … So that's some just quick comments on I-wireless fees.

Oral argument — University Baptist Church v. Lexington Insurance C

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2019

I think it's really a situation where it's a straightforward violation, the Prompt Pay Act, that they did not accept or deny. … The ones that are relevant, I think, are .056, which governs the time period for accepting or rejecting after you have all information needed to make the call.

Oral argument — Reed v. Goertz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 23, 2024

Fasano, in 2009, construed the Federal Innocence Protection Act, was presented with a request to construe it similarly to how the CCA has construed it here. And the Court rejected that request. … Is Texas's position that their comments that there may actually have been some relationship is sort of harmless, or is it a materiality point? What's the argument that you're making?

Oral argument — United States v. Garza

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2023

And so under the Controlled Substances Act, as charged in this case, Mr. … So I don't think that comment in any way suggests that the district court was seeing himself as confined to a five-year statutory maximum.

Oral argument — Jose Rodriguez-Saragosa v. Jefferson Sessions, III

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2018

So Your Honor is correct in the sense that before the jurisdictional amendments in the Immigration Nationality Act over the last couple of decades, review used to be in the district court, habeas jurisdiction … I do not believe that opposing counsel has had an opportunity to comment on it at all. Right? I think we sent it in within one week. I understand that, within one week. And I don't know.

Oral argument — Carnero G&P v. SN EF Maverick

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 1, 2025

So please follow our rules, or at least try to, which is that the yellow light will come on and give you two more minutes, and when the red light signals, we ask you to complete your comments unless the … But my client's contention, yeah, contention, is that that was a post-confirmation act. The debtors had emerged from bankruptcy.

Oral argument — Juliana Jett v. Experian Info Solutions, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2015

But this is an act where both the furnisher and the consumer reporting agency can be jointly liable for an error on somebody's report. … They have a section that says the creditor can put comments in it.

Oral argument — State of Louisiana v. Biden

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2022

We think that like other mandates within the MLA before and after 1987— Now, what was the effect of the 87 Act? … Simply canceling a comment period, which is all the Department of the Interior did here, could possibly be a final agency action subject to the APA.