Documents

Oral argument — Bengis v. Moss

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2009

It's the date of the bad act that starts the statute of money. Your Honor, it's not a question of discovery. … We'll let you have the final comments. Let's preserve and we'll hear from Mr. Gibbs. Good morning, Your Honor. Good morning.

Oral argument — FastShip, LLC v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2018

I certainly don't see anything wrong with that, but what we have here is a patent expiration date case, and we ought to be giving the full force and effect of the patent extent period for that. … So you have the 1910 Act, which did not include the word manufacture. And then there was the William Cramp case, which basically held this is a strict waiver of sovereign immunity.

Oral argument — Carter v. OPM

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2006

When the court, the court said the attorney signed, I was talking about the pre-hearing comments. Okay, well just tell me what you think Mr. Carter needs that he has not received. At this point Mr. … On what basis do you say his attorney didn't have authority to act on it? I mean, he signed the designation of record. And the designation of record specifically requested hearing.

Oral argument — Univ S Carolina v. Univ So Cal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2009

And in fact, for off and on periods of time, for the last hundred years, this record is devoid of a single instance of actual confusion. … First, Your Honor, they have not – I want to comment on the record because the record does not actually reflect that fact.

Oral argument — In Re Aqua Products, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2016

The institution phase is not the period of the proceeding in which the motion to amend comes in. But it does come in during the course of the IPR. … With respect to—there was a comment that—several comments that this is good for patent owners.

Oral argument — R.K. v. HHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2019

You just made a comment, and I'm just interested, so I don't want to put you on the spot, but you said the rare... You discussed the rarity of the Supreme Court asking for a response. … Because petitioners were not awarded compensation in this Vaccine Act case. They were not entitled to attorney's fees and costs as a matter of right.

Oral argument — Hewlett-Packard v. Acceleron

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2009

But what I'd like to hear your comments on is the extent, we know that MedImmune changed the rules. … Obviously, the holding of metamine is licensees automatically have standing, period. For everybody who isn't a licensee, what's the new test?

Oral argument — Changzhou Trina Solar Energy v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2020

We find that financing from the Ex-Im Bank under this program constitutes the financial contribution with the meaning of the act. … We further find that this program is specific because it is contingent upon export performance within the meaning of the act.

Oral argument — Microsoft Corporation v. GeoTag, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2016

Rather, the argument at that period of time was jurisdiction should be based on the fact we supply a material component. You've sued our customers, and they have demanded indemnity. … And therefore, no court or commentator has ever suggested that Holmes Group overruled this old and settled line of authority.

Oral argument — Herring v. MSPB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2014

Can you comment on that? Judge, our position is that by assurances from our office, on the 7th of August, she thought she had an attorney-client relationship. … Navy case, where when the attorney engages in misconduct or deception and doesn't act in accordance with the client.

Oral argument — +United Keetoowah Band v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2006

Rossetti's comments have indicated here. I think the other claims, they felt that they had to put them out there, because there are some ambiguities in the act, in order not to waive them completely. … Miller, hypothetically, the Congress could have just passed a statute saying that the tribes no longer have an interest in these properties, period.

Oral argument — Apple Inc. v. ITC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2025

So I can't comment on any argument that Ford would make in the future, but I think it's highly unlikely that, given the commission's practice, that century-old automobiles... … There was a series of continuation applications filed over a three-year period. Starting in 2010, there was no continuation application filed for a five-year period.

Oral argument — Cellwitch Inc. v. Tile, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2022

Didn't the board say something about how your expert admitted that Ritter's searching continuously or periodically for tags operates in the same way as the polling technique disclosed in your patent? … I understand your comment. It kind of feels like one goes with the other, especially in the context of a database. I think that...

Oral argument — Safe 'N' Sec Corporation v. SNS Holding LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2019

Sberbank unilaterally, voluntarily contacted the plaintiff during the time period that it had a legal sublicense to use and copy the software in order to develop another module relating to that globally … There's no evidence that Sberbank conducted any acts in California or directed any... Does the software protect the customer or the banks? The software protects the device.

Oral argument — DAVIS v. HHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2011

It's not just a time period, but there's a medical aspect of it. … Chin Kaplan, any comments in rebuttal? Yes, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Gumbs v. HHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 1, 2015

But what's your comment on that? Well, Your Honor, my point, I... Just so that you know what the site is, it's Title 75, Section 314B of the Oklahoma statute. … penalty due to the gravity of the offense that was alleged, was the concept that what had happened was that he had illegally practiced medicine when he saw that one patient on that one day during the period

Oral argument — Furnace Brook v. Overstock.com

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2007

In that time period, the interactive meeting would be a telex. It could have been a telex. That's how you communicate. … Stephenson, our two experts, that a computer can be programmed to act like a telephone.

Oral argument — ITServe Alliance, Inc. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2024

They never went engaged in notice and comment rulemaking. And so even under the prior Chevron regime, their interpretations would have carried no weight. … The fraud fee is not limited to applications for admission, period. That's a significant difference.

Oral argument — Excel Innovations v. You Technology

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2009

So to the extent that that order can't be interpreted as addressing the merits of Excel's claim because that claim was subject to the automatic stay under the Bankruptcy Act. … But the second issue is that stipulation was entered before the 150-day period lapsed. We stipulated well before the 150-day period lapsed, so judgment had not been entered at that point.

Oral argument — +Caroline Hunt Trust Estate v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2006

Even if the thrift was acting as some sort of agent for the Trust, under standard agency law, the language in the agreement would control. … Let me change the subject slightly, and I'd like your comments on the sub-debt contribution of equity in this case. Yes, Your Honor. What are your views on that issue?