Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

5,768 results

0.44s

  • Oral argument — Center for Biological Diversit v. Ken Salazar

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 18, 2012

    Or Denison's predecessor, and then Denison, was required to comply with applicable Clean Air Act permitting requirements, Clean Water Act permits, state groundwater permits. … They had to obtain an Air Act permit, but the Clean Air Act has a NEPA exclusion. So EPA was not required to do a NEPA analysis on issuance of the air permit.

    49 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Washington Environmental Counc v. Theodore Sturdevant

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2013

    That's a very different statute than the Clean Air Act. … Well, it's not, certain provisions of it are not very different from the Clean Air Act. In fact, as I mentioned, the Citizen Suit Provision is modeled on the Clean Air Act Citizen Suit Provision.

    48 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Vigil v. Whitman

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2003

    The attainment deadline, the courts have recognized, is the heart of this Clean Air Act. This is the stick that gets states to actually implement the Clean Air Act provisions. And what the D.C. … Air Act.

    43 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Nat'l Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Julie Su

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 17, 2022

    The California Act covers all sorts of things, including routine care, such as getting your teeth cleaned. … But the fact of the matter is that they've carved out whole groups of employees from having any benefit, including air carriers under the Railway Labor Act. That's in the California Act?

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — The Rattlesnake v. U.S. Environmental

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 25, 2007

    I suppose they did to enable them to comply, among other things, with the Clean Water Act. … Under the Clean Water Act at that time, there's some discussion of this in the excerpts, although it was not in our briefs, but at that time EPA was giving out money pursuant to the Clean Water Act to

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Coalition Protect Puget Sound v. Taylor Shellfish Company, Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2021

    The Clean, one of the Clean Water Act goals is the protection and propagation of shellfish. … On the merits, the district court here held that the Army Corps violated principal Clean Water Act and National Environmental Policy Act provisions.

    40 min of audio
  • Oral argument — The Rattlesnake Coalition v. EPA

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 25, 2007

    And then in June of the year 2000, the EPA approved the issue to order approving the plan, announced a public comment period, which was published in a classified ad in the Missoula newspaper, and then … Under the Clean Water Act at that time, there's some discussion of this in the excerpts, although it was not in our briefs, but at that time EPA was giving out money pursuant to the Clean Water Act to

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Jose Cuevas-Villalobos

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2014

    It is only slightly over the six-hour period, but nevertheless, it is outside of that safe harbor. And I believe it was the Mallory case that involved questioning within a seven-hour period. … had been cleaned of dust with fingerprints all over them, that styrofoam from the duct had been removed, that the air box had gaps in it.

    20 min of audio
  • Oral argument — American Trucking Associations v. The City of Los Angeles

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2009

    They are three years ahead of schedule in cleaning up the air. … We'd agree, Your Honor, this program has saved more lives because of the Clean Air Act aspects.

    66 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Robert Roach

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2015

    He even got you to enter into a consent decree to clean it up. Yes. … You are entitled to have that waste on your premises for a certain period of time. You're given 90 days under the Act to remove it.

    26 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Association of American Physicains, Surgeons v. Brewer, &Poe 05-15630

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 12, 2007

    , the Clean Elections Act, would act as a disincentive for them to engage in political advocacy. … These are exactly the same purposes that drive the Arizona Clean Elections Act.

    47 min of audio
  • Oral argument — WildEarth Guardians v. Deb Haaland

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2023

    Yeah, I think it's distinguishable, Your Honor, because I think in those situations, in that case, in particular, also like the Clean Air Act case that recites it, the previous Waters Gardens case, in … And I think when you look at that Clean Water Act case that you referenced or the Clean Air Act case, it is confusing. I mean, I actually was reviewing it, too.

    48 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Dean Beaver v. Tarsadia Hotels

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 4, 2016

    It just appears out of thin air as balanced against the sponsor's comments, as balanced against the name of the amendment. … I think rather you have to balance between what the sponsors say, what the title of the act says, and what Congress voted unanimously to do as opposed to this 180 days, which just appears out of thin air

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Upper Missouri Waterkeeper v. USEPA

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2021

    First, there are issues of Clean Water Act statutory interpretation. … Really, this case is about whether fundamental Clean Water Act requirements for protective water quality standards are the two primary ways that the Clean Water Act functions.

    40 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Pacific Merchant Shipping Asso v. James Goldstene

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2010

    They could have done it in the Clean Air Act. They did not. They could have done it in the Submerged Lands Act. They did not. … This Court has held that in the field of environmental regulation, unlike the field of ship design standards, the Clean Water Act dictates in favor of not requiring uniformity.

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Placer v. Beentjess

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2004

    They want to participate because they want clean air in their county, and the State is saying there's an air pollution control district, it's in your area, you are going to be part of it. … It just couldn't administer the Clean Air Act for the county?

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — City of Sausalito v. O'Neill

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2003

    I do recall that there are cases, for example, there's a city is a party within the meaning of a citizen suit provision under the Clean Air Act. … The citizen suit provisions of all three acts, the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, and the Endangered Species Act are virtually identical.

    51 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Our Children's Earth Foundation

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 13, 2007

    And there's specific Clean Water Act provisions that require EPA to periodically identify and identify any available technology control measures which could eliminate pollutants for effluent guidelines … They did it in other provisions of the Clean Water Act, in the Clean Air Act, in other environmental statutes. They did not do that here.

    49 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Jerry Hoang v. Bank of America, N.A.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 12, 2018

    By plenary, I just simply mean it's like the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act. It dominates the field of that particular subject matter. Okay. … Or can they go for any statute, like a contract statute, or even one I suggested out of clean air, the quiet title action? Let me take those questions in turn, Your Honor.

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Estate of Betty Goldberg v. Goss-Jewett Co.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2018

    Are the chemicals from the dry cleaning still on the property? Yeah, just to clarify, it's not from a dry cleaning plant. It was from a chemical supply company that supplied dry cleaners. … But again, that presumption applies particularly strongly where the government is acting to protect everybody's interests.

    36 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.