Documents

Oral argument — Thomas v. Transportation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2009

We set forth in the joint appendix extensive evidence regarding 57 errors and deviations in a similar time period. No one was treated as severely as Miss Thomas. … Thank you your honor, just a few comments. The government has said in their briefing here today that we could have addressed it on cross examination.

Oral argument — Frazier v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2006

It was an initial draft subject to public comment and subject to change. … Perhaps the only comment that I have in rebuttal to the comments from the government are the issue of this draft RMP.

Oral argument — Whirlpool v. LG Electronics

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2008

Yes, he purchased it in 94 for the purpose of performing wet cleaning and he says that in 97 he was fully doing wet cleaning and there's no dispute that wet cleaning is an entirely different, very high … Dry cleaning, wet cleaning, that's the context in which he testified about wet cleaning, and normal washing.

Oral argument — Gay v. McDonough

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2021

Chief Justice Roberts specifically addressed the issue of a clean slate or a dirty slate. … If they're not writing on a clean slate, they need to look at what's in the record. I think it gives us one more bite at the apple. What do you think the clean slate or blank slate language means?

Oral argument — Exmark Manufacturing Company v. Briggs & Stratton Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2020

Is it because of the fact that the air contacts that surface? … Second, he made a comment about that it has to project downwardly from the mower deck.

Oral argument — Bay County, Florida v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2015

Period. Period. Every single state in the union has got a PUC, right? Florida has one. Yes, Your Honor. … Beal's comments related to comedy, or the mention of comedy in the policy provision of the DFARS, again, that's 241.201.

Oral argument — VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2012

Now, what about these payments into the Clean Energy Act? And let's suppose we reject your argument about the type of mitigation costs not having to be foreseeable. … Finally, and this is just set forth in the third motion for judicial notice that we filed, Energy did argue before the District Court that the entirety of Act 74, and Act 74 is the Clean Energy Development

Oral argument — Celerity v. Ultra Clean

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2008

The first being, obviously, the Declaratory Judgment Act. … Now, within that 20-day period, they filed the suit and never served us during that period, nor did they notify us of the suit.

Oral argument — Per Aarsleff A/S v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2016

With our American subcontractor, period. In Greenland using local supplies? Correct, correct. But why doesn't that qualify? … It says you're either fully Danish, whatever that means, correct, or you're acting as a foreign subsidiary, not registered as a foreign subsidiary. You're acting as a foreign subsidiary.

Oral argument — Motionless Keyboard v. Microsoft Corp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2007

Adding the word in the air to me seems strange and artificial in light of the specification. I mean, one can't hold this in the air and one can generate electronic signals with it. … It's a simple act. I don't know what to say.

Oral argument — ATELIERS DE LA HAUTE v. BROETJE AUTO

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2012

O'Reilly's declaration, he said that at that period of time, they were looking at four-groove tubes. … The assertion in the patent is that the problem is they needed to get the air around the rivet heads in some way or another so that the air was all over the tube instead of just in the back pushing.

Oral argument — Roche v. MSPB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2009

And the definition of an employee under the FAA is an individual who meets the probationary period. For an air traffic controller, it is a one-year probationary period. And that is exactly what Mr. … the probationary period.

Oral argument — Blueport Company v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2008

the Air Force. … Violating the anti-circumvention provisions of the Millennium Act looks to me like it's blatantly clearly a tort, in which case it's clearly outside the jurisdiction of the Court of Federal Claims, period

Oral argument — Consolidation Coal v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2010

It is also so that they can clean the coal and the weight of the coal is likely far less by the time it's clean coal. It's removed all the extraneous material. … So the imposition is absolutely tied into the sale period time, time of sale. It's not tied to the extraction.

Oral argument — Mid Continent Nail Corporation v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2016

No, Commerce went through a notice and comment procedure that was entitled the non-application of the withdrawn regulation, and they gave notice and comment, went through a notice and comment proceeding … So we're talking just about the effect of this regulation over a limited period of time? That is correct. And what's that period of time?

Oral argument — Engineered Corrosion Solutions v. South-Tek Systems, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2019

That is absolutely an inactive system during that period of time. But with minimal effort every spring, I can reactivate that system. … And the whole, the whole reason for, for having a vent to vent air was to allow the nitrogen to displace the air so you don't create air pockets or air bubbles in the system where corrosion can occur.

Oral argument — Sieben v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2014

What we're talking about, if indeed she's eligible for non-disability retirement, sometime this year we're talking about benefits from the Air Force for this three-year period, subject to whatever offset … I think that period of time is the main issue.

Oral argument — Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC v. DIRECTV, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 6, 2016

In fact, it was so functionally described that if the – Actually, in 14 it talks about an over-the-air download. … Well, it simply goes to what's routine and conventional as of the time, and a downloadable application period was not. And that should be enough.

Oral argument — IN RE SAUNDERS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2011

As opposed to the existence of grooves, period. Just the concept of grooves in the path. … For aiding combustion by providing air circulation around and along the majority of the periphery. Right.

Oral argument — Boechler v. Interior

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 6, 2009

There are no witnesses that corroborate these allegedly heinous acts of government miscarriage. … Beckler to be referring to when he talks about flying an air attack mission? What's an air attack mission, if you understand?