Documents

Oral argument — Penneast Pipeline Co. v. New Jersey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2021

But we know that when states are acting under the Commerce Clause, private suits, or when Congress is acting, private suits can't be implied against the states because they aren't necessary and proper. … Finally, I'd like you to take an opportunity to comment specifically on the delegation, the U.S.'s delegation of its sovereign exemption.

Oral argument — One Wisconsin Institute, Inc. v. Mark Thomsen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 24, 2017

They find a few quotes from a few legislators that they think are racial comments. On their face, they aren't racial comments. … Harming racial minorities was in the Republicans' interest, and they had the opportunity to This overlooks not only that Act 23 and three other acts in this case were passed with Democratic support, Act

Oral argument — Parker v. Yuba Cnty. W. D.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2008

At the probationary period, is he serving at the will of the board? I think so. … Do you want to make any more comments on the application of the Healdsburg case? Certainly, Your Honor.

Oral argument — McGranahan v. Rosa

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2004

It's something that is imposed upon the acts of the parties. … But we had no overt act and no refusal, as I can tell.

Oral argument — United States v. Carlos Rivera

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2015

I also wanted to make one more comment on necessity. … And my client had no role in these other criminal acts.

Oral argument — Public Citizen v. Mineta

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2003

That regulation is not subject to that type of Hobbs Act requirement. Why not? Well, there is no statutory requirement that would impose that. … If I may just make a few comments, I hope you'll grant her a little bit of leeway.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Lopez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 22, 2019

your position your general catch all Prayer for relief would allow this court To reduce if not terminate Oh yes Yes I believe it would I want to ask a question about that I was thinking that the tax act … The new tax act is not new anymore But from a couple years ago Changed the law as to who gets the deduction For maintenance Am I incorrect?

Oral argument — Trojan v. Evans

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 14, 2005

This is not something that was promulgated according to Magnuson Act rulemaking. It doesn't have the force of law. … The first sentence says no major changes were made in the final rule due to comments received on the proposed rule. This change was not made due to comments. We know that.

Oral argument — Stand Up For California! v. DOI

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2020

period or comments for the NEPA review. … It's not disputed that this decision was made during a period where there was nobody who was an acting official for the assistant secretary. So that office was not occupied.

Oral argument — Montgomery County, Maryland v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2015

it does not toll the 60 day period but they could ask the FCC the locality could ask the FCC to toll the 60 day period but also consider as a commercial matter whether or not a wireless provider would … Those were big themes in the comments below.

Oral argument — Dribben v. Lurbo Land Trust

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 13, 2011

It includes direct acts, indirect acts, acts through third parties, and so on and so forth. Pardon me, Marcus. Sure. … There is a ruling saying that the complaint and the amended complaint are dismissed, period.

Oral argument — City and County of San Francisco v. Trump

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2025

subject to you know to these conditions and they said those are there have been some that have been identified correct but they but the mud so did the money end up going out or it just that the time period … arguments having to do with separation of powers and and the Tenth Amendment and and spent the spending clause you devoted relatively little time to them and you seem essentially to to agree that there in be air

Oral argument — Eidem v. Eidem

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2019

And that was actually a comment by Dr. Fisher, who wasn't called to testify at the time of trial, that that is a possibility. … acting prudently.

Oral argument — United States v. Kriesel

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2007

A call and comment for Mr. Kriesel. I'd like to say two minutes for rebuttal, if I may. I'd like first to briefly address the Administrative Procedure Act argument. … In this case, dealing with DNA, which provides some of the most intimate information possible about a person, that notice and comment period, that rulemaking function, may have been more critical than

Oral argument — Erickson v. Mitrione

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 12, 2025

Consumer Fraud Act. … His comments to me always were that he never received anything. And he certainly never received anything from him. But his comments to you aren't part of the record. They're not.

Oral argument — Roy Fisher v. Tucson Unified School District

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2011

He found that the district, over the period of time, had not acted in good faith. And then he proceeded to order the district to come up with a unitary plan. … I'll just make a brief comment.

Oral argument — Winston Hencely v. Fluor Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2022

So in Burn Pit, for example, the military decided the method of waste disposal to use Burn Pits, the military decided where to monitor air emissions to ensure that it didn't believe there was an inordinate … There's no evidence that the military ever did that during the time period when Mr. Nye was building the bomb.

Oral argument — 50388) USA v. GORDON

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2004

I mean, it wasn't that he just picked it out of the air prior to this. He already testified it left under the government's examination that intent was required for check cutting. … And that was a summary chart that summarized the various CMA declines that Jonathan exercised during this period.

Oral argument — Samuel Stephens, Jr. v. U.S. Railroad Retirement Board

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2012

Stevens was not eligible for an adult child disability annuity under the Railroad Retirement Act. … So, your opponent indicated that over like a 20-year period, if you take that period, that it's less than $300 a month.

Oral argument — People v. Wissmiller

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 17, 2010

I saw no comments about his silence or his failure to allocate. … I took it as her comparing his act to murder.