Documents

Oral argument — James Tate, Jr. v. University Medical Center

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2015

In my view, the trustees acting in their capacity, the Clark County Board of Commissioners acting in their capacity as the trustees for UMC, they did not have the requisite degree of integral participation … in the particular conduct or acts.

Oral argument — Channell v. Tittsworth

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 28, 2019

So the defendant didn't identify by name the individuals who were the subject of these allegedly defamatory comments. … I don't think it was something indicating that the action where they went to the state attorney may have been more involved in the Criminal Information Act violations, the Open Meetings Act violations

Oral argument — Genesis Ins. Co. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 16, 2017

on it to place the lawsuit in the 2003 policy period. … I'll just make a few short points here and quick comments.

Oral argument — In Re Discovery Lab

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

Those four words are drawn from the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. … In the period from the beginning of the class period in March of 2004, up until they advised people to form 483, the company is making a series of statements that say, in words or in substance, all steps

Oral argument — Fallon Paiute-Shoshone Tribe v. USDOI

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 15, 2022

The center and the tribe have sent a notice of intent to sue, which is required under the Endangered Species Act. Okay. And so shortly, that ran yesterday. There's a 60-day waiting period. … It's also in the comments they submitted prior to the project's approval.

Oral argument — Kwai Wong v. David Beebe

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2012

Would you agree that had Judge Jones acted in a more timely fashion, no pun intended, that Mr. … I don't really have any further comments unless there's questions you'd like me to address. I don't have any. I don't either. Okay. We'll try and puzzle our way through this. The case is submitted.

Oral argument — Porada v. Lavelle

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 11, 2018

The illegal, her comment about illegal refers to A and B. … I think the exact language is something to the effect that it was dismissed pursuant to the Act, that is the what we'll call the Citizens Participatory Act, and alternatively under 2615.

Oral argument — United Airlines, Inc. v. TSA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 21, 2017

But there's no time period associated with that, and I'm not aware of any time limitations period or claim filing deadline that has an indefinite period of time. … I think it's not in accordance with law because it was acting solely in the capacity of like a judge would in finding that issue of preclusion applied.

Oral argument — FREEMAN v. LASKY HAAS & COHLER

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 16, 2005

What could be more direct than delaying the day of reckoning by, you know, you pay your lawyers to keep the ball up in the air, avoid the day of reckoning so we can enjoy the fruits of this illegal conduct … I want to comment, while I still have time, on what counsel started with, which I think is an important question, and I'm sure in the minds of the Court, how does this case differ from the Theofil case

Oral argument — National Postal Policy Council v. PRC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2021

The commission also acknowledges that periodic rebasing between regulatory periods is an accepted practice in price cap regulation, but it refused to take that additional step. … The commission never said in its orders below, never said that it was acting incrementally as to cost coverage.

Oral argument — Rojas v. Atty Gen USA Rehearing En Banc

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 29, 2013

In that case, it was the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, which I'll just call the Prescription Drug Act, and the Federal Controlled Substances Act. … Put the shovel in the government's hand and clean it up? There's a couple things in that.

Oral argument — First American Bank v. Poplar Creek

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 30, 2024

We also go back to looking at the comments. … There's a critical time period issue here during which the Poplar Creek development was viable.

Oral argument — Slack Technologies, LLC v. Pirani

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 17, 2023

Would you comment on the tracing requirement? Mr. Hungar, I believe he said it was always there. And I'd like to hear your reaction to that. Sure. … It is a core thing that the 33 Act is designed to regulate.

Oral argument — Robert Smith v. Kilolo Kijakazi

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2022

Anderson, opined several times during the period in issue that Mr. … Do you want to comment? It seemed to me that Dr. Rouse found that there were symptoms missing that Dr. Anderson didn't see. Was he wrong on that? I'm sorry.

Oral argument — Ureteknologia v. Uretek

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 2, 2021

Uretek did not mention the Covenant Not to Compete Act in the pretrial order. … And then, yet again, I would also note, as we've stated over and over again in our briefing and otherwise, the case was not tried under the Covenant Not to Compete Act. No mention of this act.

Oral argument — Uldrych v. VHS of Illinois

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2010

In fact, the Contribution Act should therefore apply. … periods or reposed periods than claims for personal injury or arising out of patient care.

Oral argument — Juliette Grimmett v. Nancy Freeman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2022

And, of course, we know the law that says that we presume that the legislature acts with awareness of the law and... … Right, but they can't act with awareness of a Supreme Court decision that hadn't been decided yet.

Oral argument — United States v. Americans Against Oppressive Laws Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 16, 2016

I would say that the comments, the control date, I think that all of it is important. I mean, if one wanted to be cynical, we'd say the comments. This isn't about names. It's about comments. … Why does a control number, meaning when it was filed or acted upon, and a comment made about it, why is that identifying information? It is information. I get that.

Oral argument — BIGGERS v. NAVY

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2013

If the court were to look at the Back Pay Act, which is a statute Congress enacted, it does not make that distinction. The Back Pay Act, which is Section 5596, says nothing about the ground of it. … period.

Oral argument — United States v. Alfred Villalobos

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2014

So she was paid for a period of time. … That money she was ultimately allowed to keep, the money that she actually earned doing that and the money that she actually earned when she was for a short period of time acting as a teacher's assistant