Documents

Oral argument — Arnold v. Town of Camillus, New York

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2025

I guess her argument is she's describing various offensive acts by this guy that taken together show that over an eight-year period, he was harassing her frequently. And Mr. … I think we've got your comments very well in mind. Thank you, we'll reserve a decision.

Oral argument — Greenstreet v. SSA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 4, 2008

The premise of the Civil Service Reform Act, as we've discussed. I guess you're arguing that a two week suspension and then a two year period without pay is like a two week and two year suspension. … Really, I'm trying to, you say the court, I was thinking of your comment that the court thought the penalty was disproportionate.

Oral argument — Intercontinental Exchange, Inc v. SEC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2021

And that, you know, the difference is really just that light, and this defies my memory of physics, that light travels somehow faster in air than it does over fiber. … And I mean, what we heard from every commenter was a deep concern about that exact issue. And the commission was persuaded by those comments.

Oral argument — Fair Housing Council v. Roommate.com

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 14, 2011

Well, Kurt, that's permissible anyway under our earlier decision where you can say that in the comments. Yes, that's right. You certainly can do that. … They will continue to act that way.

Oral argument — Jorge Garcia v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 30, 2011

The state is acting in loco parentis. But the state has no adjusted status. … The papers were immediately submitted within a two-week period, and the agency considered the case in due time.

Oral argument — United States v. Ira Isaacs

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2009

I know that I sent a recent letter to the Court under Rule 28J commenting on government threats, intimidation. … So a reasonable person could believe that during that period of time, the judge had certainly had a conflict. A reasonable person would think the judge had a conflict of interest.

Oral argument — United States v. Delle Donna

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 22, 2009

I understand that the three counts of political corruption, the two mail frauds as well as the Hobbs Act, go together. … There was a portion of the record that had to do with whether there was a hang period. There was a discussion of whether there was some kind of hang period.

Oral argument — Mahone v. Lehman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 7, 2003

Under Pellich, until he does that, the removal period has still been suspended, so we don't have a Zabeda situation because he is still within the removal period. … May it please the Court, I have a couple just brief comments. Brief comments. Could you explain this one thing at the crux of it? Yes, Your Honor. Why hasn't he filed?

Oral argument — Doe v. Brown University

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2021

Well, it started a rollercoaster of accumulated allegations coming from one source, Jane, who repeated acts of retaliation, which Brown overlooked. … Well, the deans disputed that comment, Your Honor. It was a contention that the plaintiff made. But for summary judgment, that doesn't help you.

Oral argument — United States v. Freeman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2025

Supreme Court, repeatedly comments that, you know, an arguable textual basis in the statute is not sufficient when it comes to a major questions issue. … The same way that when the EPA went too far in the West Virginia case and they said, well, since we have a right to regulate air pollutants, we have a right to order coal powered production to sort of

Oral argument — Capron v. Massachusetts Attorney General

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2018

One thing the Attorney General argues is that when there was the reference to the Fair Labor Standards Act, that inherent in the Fair Labor Standards Act is what you call the Savings Clause, and through … Even though it wasn't done through notice and comment? Even though it wasn't done through notice and comment.

Oral argument — Angela Hobson v. HSC Real Estate Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2012

That final act of discrimination, in our opinion, extends the statute of limitations period to May 16th, which was the last date that they were in the premises. A hypothetical question. … And he said that, he comments on the deposition, but then he goes further and says he comments that you look at that isolated comment, alleging if you're going to look at that comment, then you must look

Oral argument — Doc Society v. Antony Blinken

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 13, 2024

Mayorkas in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Homeland Security. Ms. DeSalle for the balance, Mr. Brewer for the appellees. Ms. DeSalle, you may proceed. … So if we were to go with you, is there any clean-up in our case law? I think what your honors could say is that to the extent that prior D.C.

Oral argument — Ashford v. Aviation Technical Svc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2023

As Magistrate Kaye noted, they requested attorney's fees under the Louisiana Unfair Trade Practices Act, which does entitle them by statute potentially to treble damages. … We heard some comments about this being a second fight at the apple and questions about the Southwest Erector's case and the new factual basis.

Oral argument — Playmakers v. ESPN

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2004

That's one of the purposes of the Lanham Act. … The concept of tarnishment, as I think we all know, preexisted the Federal Anti-Delusion Act. It existed long before the Federal Delusion Act when there was only confusion cases.

Oral argument — Marc Hall v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2021

Somebody tell you it's six millimeters, and you already have reduction in air capacity. I mean, it's interesting. … If you don't have a comment on it, I'm totally fine not hearing from you on it. I just wanted to know if you did what it was. No, I did not, sir.

Oral argument — BillJCo, LLC v. Apple Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2025

The patents disclose improvements in mobile systems to perceive and act on location information. … Could you comment on periodic beaconing? Yes, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Peverelle v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 22, 2017

Now, there's a litany of cases in the state of Illinois which say that a claimant's testimony alone may be sufficient to support an award of benefits under the Act so long as the weight of the evidence … Pepperell is entitled to DTD for the entire period from January 8, 2013 to May 30, 2014 because the condition had not stabilized and she was unable to work during that period. Thank you, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Martinez v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2016

That's a classic definition of a limitations period. … Wingo, whereas the act is more counting kinds of things. Yes, so the government's view is the Speedy Trial Act does not apply here. Mr. Cruz, under Mr.

Oral argument — United States v. Leone

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2020

So if I have time, I'll make some comments on this, if I may. … And so then, you know, isn't it right that he actually hasn't — doesn't have a history of acting inappropriately with children in public places?