Documents

Oral argument — Schuyler File v. Jill Kastner

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2021

And the answer to that is I think both inherent in the comments in the dissent to the denial of review in JARCO where Justice Thomas made very clear that the claims are foreclosed by Keller, period, end … I want to also briefly in the short period of time I have left here respond briefly to the comment that Janus essentially overruled any procedures relating to how First Amendment rights might be protected

Oral argument — Moke America LLC v. Moke International Limited

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2024

You can go to the definition of trademark in the Lanham Act it's any word, name, symbol device or combination I have the red light is it okay if I continue? … Two other points I want to make in response to my worthy adversary's comments. Number one, at the beginning of the trial, the judge even says the only issue here is priority.

Oral argument — Johnathan Jones v. LVMPD

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 15, 2016

I'll make one more comment. … I'll make a few comments and then I'll answer any questions that you have.

Oral argument — United States v. Adam Fox

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2024

These comments were made directly to either person one or person two, person one being the caller to Mr. Blanchard. … Just that they're going to do it, and somebody has to carry out an overt act. We can ask about the juror issue. Yes, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Clemente v. OR Dept. Corrections

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2009

On the Equal Protection Act pay discrimination claim, as the District Court correctly found, ER 193, the plaintiff made out a prima facie case of pay discrimination. … There's a comment by the appellant about termination, but there's nothing in the record I can recall that specifically said why they didn't complete the probationary period.

Oral argument — United States v. Gall

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2016

So I can't comment on if one were to actually view these photographs, whether it would be self-evident from these actual photographs. That it was a five-year-old. Okay. That I'm not sure of. … And significantly, we cite a case law in our brief showing that on plain air review, other circuit courts have affirmed conditions with similar language. Thank you. Thank you, Your Honors.

Oral argument — Argueta Anariba v. Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 21, 2022

as the Attorney General, Attorney General's delegates are clear and therefore no air deference is afforded. … First of all, you have an expert act for David that was not addressed at all, which is problematic at its core. You want to address that?

Oral argument — People v. Gallard

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 29, 2016

Isn't this also consistent with our defendant here just firing into the air, just firing into the sky? … Third, as far as this being a premeditated act, again, it's sort of besides the point. We don't know what the intended act was. Was it to kill? Was it to scare? Was it to hurt?

Oral argument — Williams v. Smith

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2026

Williams is asking and did ask the District Court to do was to compel under the APA or under the Mandamus Act agency action that he had characterized that had been unreasonably delayed. … By definition, you have a 60-day period to take the test. The test is not given. So is that then your duty to go back and requalify for the 60-day period and present that again?

Oral argument — United States v. Anthony

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2021

And so as the it would make no sense to tie the limitations period for Congress, who is intending to create a limitation period, to tie that limitation period to something that could not be raised under … But the reason this court shouldn't reach that conclusion is that the comment of this court, or the comment in Burton, which is a state case, has nothing to do with Rule 32K, doesn't interpret what Congress

Oral argument — Menefee v. Illinois Workers' Peoria Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 17, 2024

You can see through the way the case was handled, and I think that the commission, the arbitrator, commented on some of the actions of the City of Peoria on some of these issues. … One is the documents, the payroll records, don't cover the full-time period.

Oral argument — Charles Ikekwere v. Department of the Treasury

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2018

Most of them were before that 45-day period. … Equiquere that he did not believe that he had closed these cases, and those kinds of comments to Mr.

Oral argument — Millay v. State of Maine Department of

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 30, 2014

That was the underlying issue, and that was, that has been in the Rehab Act since 1973. … And finally, I note that Justice Stevens in Jones cited with favor Justice Scalia's comment that a uniform nationwide limitations period for a federal cause of action is always more than others.

Oral argument — Matepa v. Mukasey

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2008

And what was the nature of those comments that were being made repeatedly over a year period of time? … And those calls occurred over a period of 18 months. They were never acted upon. However, there were calls over an 18-month period.

Oral argument — Matthew Reeves v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 21, 2022

The election, the period has ended. Mhm. I followed that your honor. … Can you comment on that? Yes, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Olin Corporation v. The Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2010

However, Justice, you referred to Section 10 of the Act, and Section 10 of the Act does apply in this case, and Section 10 of the Act says that that overtime is to be excluded unless it is part of a set … I just simply want to respond to counsel's opening comment about Mr. Hall's testimony.

Oral argument — United States v. Keith

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 18, 2023

So when are we talking about the period of time that you're questioning the speedy trial act? Well, we're questioning... I see on July 9th, he was offered a trial, wasn't he, and turned it down. … Again, my comments before apply. There's no indication why the court couldn't have decided on November 23rd when it's issued its order.

Oral argument — Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Daniel Ashe

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2017

So you've got a, you know, very long period of time that this project will be implemented. … Was, you know, is there a response to a comment that says you said this, and this is our exact response? No, because that doesn't happen when you don't get the comment. Okay. Thank you. Thank you.

Oral argument — VoteAmerica v. Schwab

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2026

But on that, the findings of the district court as to historical fact are still important, and so important that we apply the clear air standard, right? … You can expand it, but it's not the act of voting. Well, I think it is part of the act of voting.

Oral argument — United States v. Beau Lewis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2009

Well, on – on – there are two separate periods at issue. … Burroughs – and so for this first period, dealing with the first period, Burroughs had indicated that he was going to plead guilty.