Documents

Oral argument — Public Utility Dist. 1 of Snoh. Cnty. v. BPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2005

So they're relying on the DSI comments. … In the record of decision, we go into these things in great detail on many, many issues that were raised during the two-year process and the comment period for the settlements themselves.

Oral argument — Mullen v. Peoples

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 1, 2010

For what period of time would it have been told? It was a very short period of time. Yes, it was about five weeks. His birthday was August 14th, and the complaint had been filed June 24th. … And in Hatchett, although in the end this court reversed the granting of the 103B motion, in Hatchett the committee comments concerning the rule were noted, and the committee comments talked about the

Oral argument — United States v. Anthony

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2021

And so as the it would make no sense to tie the limitations period for Congress, who is intending to create a limitation period, to tie that limitation period to something that could not be raised under … But the reason this court shouldn't reach that conclusion is that the comment of this court, or the comment in Burton, which is a state case, has nothing to do with Rule 32K, doesn't interpret what Congress

Oral argument — Secretary of the Army v. StructSure Projects, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2025

So if the delay in the 13-month period was caused by the government as a contractor, then you get money for it. If it was caused by the government acting as a sovereign, you don't. … Let me clarify one of my comments earlier that I think got this off track. I'm not suggesting that the government breached the original contract. I'm saying that the government...

Oral argument — Denault v. Ahern

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2017

And this case is a classic example of why the Equal Access to Justice Act requires an award of attorney's fees for a prevailing party. … But it is clear that in fact the defendants make light of this in counsel's comments in the pre-trial conference and in the initial comments that are in the record. That Ms. Testa and Mr.

Oral argument — Schuyler File v. Jill Kastner

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2021

And the answer to that is I think both inherent in the comments in the dissent to the denial of review in JARCO where Justice Thomas made very clear that the claims are foreclosed by Keller, period, end … I want to also briefly in the short period of time I have left here respond briefly to the comment that Janus essentially overruled any procedures relating to how First Amendment rights might be protected

Oral argument — United States v. Richard Wuerfel

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2014

Maybe he acts out with dolls, and that keeps him from acting out with children. There was no suggestion that he had acted out with children, Your Honor, and Judge King noted that on the record. … I just wanted to respond to one comment.

Oral argument — Jimmy Powell v. Troy Hermans

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2020

You also have to think about here, over the four-day period of the trial, he began by saying, I want you to remember that Mr. Powell was assaulted. He did not act with utter disregard. … And also, just I really want to just last comment will be his actions after the fact also didn't tend to negate, negate the utter disregard element. Mr.

Oral argument — D'Angelo v. Crofts

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2005

We are not trying to impose liability for their direct acts. It's the act of supervision, the act of implementation. And Crofts is the only person that supervised and implemented this policy. … It says that the 12-month period does not begin until acts indicative of an intent to establish residency are taken and does not run for any period of time for which you are enrolled for seven or more

Oral argument — Harris v. Viegelahn

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 1, 2015

Scalia It leaves up in the air what happens to the material that is not described in that provision, right? Mr. Madden I think the statute doesn't explicitly say what happens to that material. … Now, that's because when trustees act outside their service, that's how the liability works in the bankruptcy code.

Oral argument — American Aviation Supply v. Illinois Department of Revenue

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2024

Air purchased fuel in Illinois from American Aviation Supply. … But if the statute is ambiguous, the legislative history simply states one lone senator's comment about the statute.

Oral argument — YETIV v. HUD

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2006

But HUD ALJ in this case and in every other case, they've all commented that this makes no sense. I agree with them. … If that's up in the air, it's hard to see that these were important to HUD.

Oral argument — Petermeyer v. The Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 23, 2021

And Miss Latham, she's the one who wrote the comment about he is not employable or he's not likely to return to his job. I have it here. … He has he has an associate's degree in refrigeration and air conditioning and a college certificate in construction management.

Oral argument — AAAG California v. Kisana

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2021

that right we're not no well we haven't challenged purposes of this proceeding you are not challenging that for purposes of this proceeding we haven't challenged the factual findings under the clear air … Cassana didn't I mean doesn't change the fact that they conspired to do that together well then the question becomes and this goes back to your initial comment about what a what a what a contract essentially

Oral argument — D'Angelo v. Ratelle

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2003

Having gone through many social security hearings where we have the experts testify by phone, I'm used to talking to the air and then hearing a response back. … It's important for you to take it back to 91 to get the full benefits during the pre-96 period.

Oral argument — United States v. Adam Fox

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2024

These comments were made directly to either person one or person two, person one being the caller to Mr. Blanchard. … Just that they're going to do it, and somebody has to carry out an overt act. We can ask about the juror issue. Yes, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Osburn v. Astrue

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 20, 2008

Osburn brought this claim pursuant to the Social Security Act and seeks social security disability benefits and supplemental security income. … So we're really looking at a closed period of approximately his SSI application date, and the review period ends with the period of when the ALJ's decision was issued.

Oral argument — 4-10308/04-10311 United States v. Ruiz/Ramirez-Noriega

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2005

act upon it. … That cost reporting period under 412.71 was the 1983 base year.

Oral argument — Joseph Dacar v. Saybolt L.P.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2018

The Department of Labor's 2008 proffer to amend it was going through notice and comment during this time period and would have been a notice and comment regulation had that process been followed, but instead … No, that's the definition of regular rate in all contexts under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Oral argument — VoteAmerica v. Schwab

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2026

But on that, the findings of the district court as to historical fact are still important, and so important that we apply the clear air standard, right? … You can expand it, but it's not the act of voting. Well, I think it is part of the act of voting.