Documents

Oral argument — AAAG California v. Kisana

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2021

that right we're not no well we haven't challenged purposes of this proceeding you are not challenging that for purposes of this proceeding we haven't challenged the factual findings under the clear air … Cassana didn't I mean doesn't change the fact that they conspired to do that together well then the question becomes and this goes back to your initial comment about what a what a what a contract essentially

Oral argument — Petermeyer v. The Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 23, 2021

And Miss Latham, she's the one who wrote the comment about he is not employable or he's not likely to return to his job. I have it here. … He has he has an associate's degree in refrigeration and air conditioning and a college certificate in construction management.

Oral argument — Trujillo v. Sheriff Washoe Cnty

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2009

I want to call them whatever he wants the conclusion to be to be drawn from a specific act. … Speaking to the after the fact comments, mind you, these weren't just comments. Mr. Trujillo says they were giggling about it. So, I mean. Let me ask you a question about that.

Oral argument — Robert Underhill v. Huntington National Bank

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 30, 2014

Well, I think 727E allows a one-year period for that discharge to be revoked. … There was a comment in the deposition of Beth Underhill. And the question was, when did she learn of the acts of defendants? She answered April of 2009. It wasn't specific.

Oral argument — Coney Island Auto Parts, Inc. v. Burton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2025

I understand the Rules Enabling Act, it just can't enlarge rights. … But when you know someone's coming after you, you probably should act.

Oral argument — V.O.S. Selections, Inc. v. Trump

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 31, 2025

But just the National Emergency Act is different, right? Correct. … authority to the duty of tariff rate quotas, Section 301 of the Trade Act of 74, Section 731 of the Tariff Act of 1930, Section 107 of the Trade Act, Section 505 of the Trade Act of 74.

Oral argument — Chaudhary v. Department of Human Services

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 20, 2022

The agency was acting prior to the appeal hearing, and therefore the party or the opponent in that case was the party who bore the burden of proof. … But a few comments on the evidence. The department's evidence did show activity for Mr. Ramzan at that address, the White Oak address within the overpayment period.

Oral argument — Kolkevich v. Atty Gen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2007

If I may, Your Honor, I was somewhat, with all due respect, somewhat perplexed by your comment that there was some time. … I have not understood that act to have created some kind of a, I forget what Your Honor said, a one-year period. After the passage.

Oral argument — HALL v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2012

And it's very clear in the Remand Act portion of the Tucker Act that that's authorized. … Specifically, a witness is unlikely to be summoned for more than a few hours or even more than a few days, whereas this jury service was for an extended period of time.

Oral argument — McGranahan v. Rosa

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2004

It's something that is imposed upon the acts of the parties. … But we had no overt act and no refusal, as I can tell.

Oral argument — Negron v. Colvin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2018

I suffered these very acts as we speak. On July of 2017, the 5th, that was my individual vacation day, which I took off. … As per the labor laws as they state, the commanding officer can allow one tour, not one tour, one four-hour period.

Oral argument — United States v. Thomas M. Smith

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 28, 2019

In November of 2017, she began her period of supervised release. … So simply, Your Honors, it's our position that the mental health diagnosis, and based on some of the comments of the court, that it was as if it was being used against my client.

Oral argument — Backcountry Against Dumps v. FAA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2023

Petitioners were entitled to notice of the comment period on this proposal. … Because this required notice was not provided, petitioners were not given the opportunity to state their aeronautical objections to the project during the comment period.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Lopez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 22, 2019

your position your general catch all Prayer for relief would allow this court To reduce if not terminate Oh yes Yes I believe it would I want to ask a question about that I was thinking that the tax act … The new tax act is not new anymore But from a couple years ago Changed the law as to who gets the deduction For maintenance Am I incorrect?

Oral argument — People v. Hunter

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 16, 2013

persons in the same location and within a short period of time Which I think speaks to the time and place element of it While it's correct that in the majority of the cases which are cited in our briefs … goods stolen from four or five different places Well, I would say that The committee comments would suggest that that would be multiple acts that the elements would be different that there are different

Oral argument — Citadel Securities LLC v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2026

The commenters were almost universally. What is there beyond the comment letters? Then there is the record that was in the D-Limit case that showed latency arbitrage on the equities market. … And it will help us and, therefore, by extension, ordinary investors on whose behalf we act in terms of the market.

Oral argument — Anthony Jordan v. SSA Terminals, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2020

I might be able to follow all of your sophisticated comments. … Jordan to show the nature and extent of his disability during the dispute period.

Oral argument — People v. Schag

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 1, 2010

I never thought about anything like that because the jury told them we're deadlocked, period. That's what he knew. That's what the judge knew. They were deadlocked, period, to infinity. … They were egregious, colorful comments.

Oral argument — Marc Hall v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2021

Somebody tell you it's six millimeters, and you already have reduction in air capacity. I mean, it's interesting. … If you don't have a comment on it, I'm totally fine not hearing from you on it. I just wanted to know if you did what it was. No, I did not, sir.

Oral argument — Playmakers v. ESPN

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2004

That's one of the purposes of the Lanham Act. … The concept of tarnishment, as I think we all know, preexisted the Federal Anti-Delusion Act. It existed long before the Federal Delusion Act when there was only confusion cases.