Documents

Oral argument — Osburn v. Astrue

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 20, 2008

Osburn brought this claim pursuant to the Social Security Act and seeks social security disability benefits and supplemental security income. … So we're really looking at a closed period of approximately his SSI application date, and the review period ends with the period of when the ALJ's decision was issued.

Oral argument — Romeo & Juliette Laser Hair v.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2017

It depends on the period of time you want to measure, Your Honor. Judge Loy, the issue of improvement I think is somewhat difficult to quantify because what we're facing is an unknown. … We've traced comments to them that are defamatory. First, the defendants denied making those comments. They later came around and said, well, if we made them, then we were permitted to make them.

Oral argument — Genesis Insurance Company v. National Union Fire Insurance

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2012

And where we are today is that Executive Risk has placed this loss in the 2003-2004 policy period and treated it as exhausting that policy period. … Addressing the comment about this being a weird case, this case is weird because MAGMA didn't give full notice to genesis.

Oral argument — Wesley Simmons v. Navajo County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 3, 2009

If you look at this very, very lengthy notice of claim, it includes very little comment, although it does include comment about grief that the parents experienced, but includes much more. … Would you comment upon the disability that's claimed by this young man?

Oral argument — Hadley v. Subscriber Doe

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 21, 2014

The specific comments underneath that story had absolutely nothing to do with each other. In other words, not only was the comment about Mr. … , Communications Decency Act, I think it's CDC.

Oral argument — Young v. Stephens

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 19, 2019

The police acted reasonably up until that point. Again, made no argument of that. So this all comes down to the probativeness of this evidence. … Air Methods Corporation.

Oral argument — SMITH & NEPHEW v. ARTHREX

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2012

The 12-6 number is picked out of the air by Arthrex. … You also have to have knowledge that the direct infringer's acts constitute infringement. It's a direct quote from the case. No doubt about that.

Oral argument — Discount Inn, Inc. v. City of Chicago

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 16, 2015

I'd like to direct my comments to the excessive fines challenge, the First Amendment challenge, and the vagueness challenge. … It's regulation of weeds, of aesthetics, of air quality, of things of that sort are certainly within the city's power.

Oral argument — Mahone v. Lehman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 7, 2003

Under Pellich, until he does that, the removal period has still been suspended, so we don't have a Zabeda situation because he is still within the removal period. … May it please the Court, I have a couple just brief comments. Brief comments. Could you explain this one thing at the crux of it? Yes, Your Honor. Why hasn't he filed?

Oral argument — Jakarta Grogan v. Triton Diving Services, L.L.C.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2015

Without having compressed air cylinders with manifolds positioned on the back deck of the Triton Achiever, so the Triton crew could access oxygen if H2S was encountered. … I think there was but in terms of the act of doing the inviting, it was W&T from the point of saying we want to use Tiger to getting the purchase order to dictating how and what equipment was sent out

Oral argument — United States v. Jari

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2006

And our argument, Your Honor, is that it was unreasonable to invent a history of prior bad acts on Mr. Jari's part that aren't supported by any record. … But there's just this sort of out of thin air, and so 90 percent of it was fraudulent. Isn't there? I mean, did he ever make a finding that he believed that? It's the same guideline range.

Oral argument — United States v. Arnold

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 18, 2007

For instance, for a traveling judge, I would assume that a judge may well electronically have draft opinions, bench memos, things talking about weaknesses or strengths, comments perhaps on personal opinions … million passengers and pedestrians, over 70,000 truck, rail, and sea containers, 300,000 incoming vehicles, over $80 million in fees, duties, and tariffs, and a quarter million incoming international air

Oral argument — 1-19-1378

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 15, 2021

relevant part, it is unlawful for a person to knowingly possess on or about his person or on his land or in his own abode or fixed place of business, any weapon prohibited under section 24-1 of this act … It was literally one of the public defender's first comments in her closing arguments that the state had alleged it was an abode and they'd failed to prove so. That is prejudice in and of itself.

Oral argument — Sharon Gallimore v. City of Opa-Locka, Florida

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2025

So, it's either the employer acted because of the age or it didn't. … Or hey, maybe we should look to get rid of the assistant chief or some other comment that's not entirely direct, but close to there or some other type of circumstantial evidence.

Oral argument — Coal City Redi-Mix Company v. Pontiac Exchange, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 26, 2014

The pawnbroker, usually on a fairly short-term basis, as in this case, I believe the redemption period of the transaction was made September 17th. The redemption period was October 17th. … Well, Justice Schmidt commented that if there's a good faith arm's length transaction, that their due process rights should be allowed.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Beattie v. Bybee

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 27, 2013

King's marijuana imprisonment and try to act like because he went to prison, somehow he's unfit to be at the home or be around the child. … She said that throughout this period of time, he continued to have these very, very stressed out comments.

Oral argument — Dave v. Schmitz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 20, 2019

And that's an affirmative act by ISP. What about simply the continued existence of the individual's name on the registry? We're talking about the act of expungement. … And maintaining the database means removing names from the database after the 10-year period has expired. Or after their period that requires them to continue reporting has expired, right?

Oral argument — David Heinz v. Carrington Mortgage Services

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2020

There are two short statutes as part of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act that we analyzed. The first is 15 U.S.C. 1692E. … In the less than a year period, it's a 10 month period from Carrington starting servicing the loan to their foreclosure.

Oral argument — Richard Gilman v. Arnold Schwarzenegger

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 12, 2010

As you know, this case involves California Proposition 9, otherwise known as the Victims' Bill of Rights Act of 2008, Marcy's Law, which amended California Penal Code Section 3041.5 to increase the time … We appreciate your comments and we'll hear from Ms. Knox. Thank you. Monica Knox for the prisoners. Good morning. I'd like to make a few factual comments on some of the issues that came up.

Oral argument — Pielet v. Pielet

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2012

The statute at issue, section 12.80 of the Business Corporation Act addresses what rights, claims and liabilities survive the dissolution of a corporation and if so, for how long. … I have no further comments. Thank you to all counsel for your arguments today. Case number 112064, Dorothy Pilot et al. versus James Pilot et al. is taken under advisement as agenda number eight.