Documents

Oral argument — Joseph Valdez v. Quality Communications

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2013

How long a period of time are we talking? Okay. We're talking a matter of months. And what happened, Your Honor, was Judge Proh didn't just order us to do it. … that Valdez does have standing to appeal any of the prior orders in the case, or you can find that Valdez does not have standing, but that Landers – Usually we don't just make a legal decision in the air

Oral argument — Sammie Stokes v. Bryan Stirling

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2022

If the State inadvertently forfeits them – so in Day, for example, the State, I think, had miscalculated the limitations period – the Court has discretion then to reach the issue, although it's not required … It's a limitation on the federal court's authority to act. It is restricted. It is mandatory.

Oral argument — American Aviation Supply v. Illinois Department of Revenue

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2024

Air purchased fuel in Illinois from American Aviation Supply. … But if the statute is ambiguous, the legislative history simply states one lone senator's comment about the statute.

Oral argument — Olin Corporation v. The Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2010

However, Justice, you referred to Section 10 of the Act, and Section 10 of the Act does apply in this case, and Section 10 of the Act says that that overtime is to be excluded unless it is part of a set … I just simply want to respond to counsel's opening comment about Mr. Hall's testimony.

Oral argument — Iannoni v. City of Chicago

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2019

It does not serve the purpose of the Act, which is to compensate injured workers for their injuries. To pay this out over time when the employer knows what its liability is. Pay the award, period. … This award should be paid, period. There's no installment plan in the workers' compact.

Oral argument — Harris v. Viegelahn

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 1, 2015

Scalia It leaves up in the air what happens to the material that is not described in that provision, right? Mr. Madden I think the statute doesn't explicitly say what happens to that material. … Now, that's because when trustees act outside their service, that's how the liability works in the bankruptcy code.

Oral argument — et_al._USA v. Hickson_et_al._Part_1

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 22, 2024

I mean, he went back and forth over a period of many days. So no, that's true. Would that make it intrinsic? … For that reason, we suggested plain air. Were it not plain air... From the point of view of the government, wants a fair result, obviously. Yeah.

Oral argument — Radford v. Brand

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 16, 2007

That's the one that pretty well triggered his reaction, but he still didn't act until June. And he should have acted. Is that Mr. Asuna? That's Mr. Asuna. … He should have acted more quickly, but I would point out there that the failure to act more quickly didn't harm Ms.

Oral argument — United States v. Daren Gadsden

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2015

Why isn't that a pretty clean line to draw? I agree that it is. … And I think Judge Wynn's comments are very. But that's not the only. Your risk of loss argument does seem to be preserved.

Oral argument — Pacific Coast Federation of Fi v. Gary Locke

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 7, 2012

Here they proceeded coextensively for a period of time. They were initiated at different periods of time. … There's a shell game going on in which the comment that you might want to make about 20 really applies to 21, and the comment you might want to make about 21 applied to 20, and the comment period is closed

Oral argument — D'Angelo v. Crofts

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2005

We are not trying to impose liability for their direct acts. It's the act of supervision, the act of implementation. And Crofts is the only person that supervised and implemented this policy. … It says that the 12-month period does not begin until acts indicative of an intent to establish residency are taken and does not run for any period of time for which you are enrolled for seven or more

Oral argument — United States v. Close

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2022

As a union-represented employee, she was subject to a probationary period of 150 days. … I think it may have been a comment that was a random comment, a stray comment made by somebody who used it for judgment.

Oral argument — +Carabetta Enterprises v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2007

It's watched the Army, the Navy, the Air Force, and the Marine Corps contracting. It doesn't like the way the Marine Corps' contracting operation works. … Well, I think the indication is the fact that it's all, of course, in one act, this Appropriations Act, and in the Appropriations Act, Congress simultaneously did several things.

Oral argument — In Re Boy Scouts of America

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2022

So that's gonna go on for a long period of time. … And I think what happened, Judge Ambrose, I think you even mentioned that there may be something that this court can clean up in this case. And I think that's exactly right.

Oral argument — United States v. Brandon Locke

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2019

This is an act that occurs before the court, not in the lawyer's office, not in my client's home, the court. But there is a presumption of regularity, Judge Wilkinson. … There's nothing on the Fourth Circuit that is- We write this on a clean slate. Yes.

Oral argument — Lauri Howe v. Robert C. Litwack

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2014

And those are things which were litigated, aired, and a statement was made by the state court judge on more than one occasion saying, No, he hasn't exceeded his authority. … Would that be limited to acting within the bounds of his official duties? Well, yes, I think it would.

Oral argument — In Re Tribune Media Company,etal.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 25, 2018

Your Honor, if I could talk about that period, they're talking about an eight-year period here, from the discrimination to the appeal to the district court. … Without doubting for a second the kind of alleged comments and the deep offensiveness of the alleged comments that Mr.

Oral argument — Glycine & More, Inc. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2017

Is a timely request one that's made prior to the 90-day expiration period? Correct. And you're saying that if the request is made after the 90-day period, there's a different rule? Yes. … When the regulation says that secretaries should act in a way when it's reasonable to do so, it is expected that the secretary will act reasonably, which would be to consider all the evidence in front

Oral argument — Sheila Anderson v. Commissioner, Social Security

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 13, 2019

Fuseli estimated that the six to 12 months, that clearly does not meet the act's durational requirement of a continuous period of at least 12 months. … Yeager, also in the moment period, found that Anderson was not disabled and could do light duty and eventually normal work.

Oral argument — NRDC v. USEPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2020

We sincerely hope that if this Court orders EPA to act, it will act lawfully and begin to initiate the cancellation process as we've laid out. … And if either of those entities do advance objections to EPA's proposal, then the course is to publish everything in the Federal Register, allow for comment, and at that point EPA makes a decision whether