Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.20s

  • Oral argument — People v. Cardona

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 16, 2013

    Even though he's made some comments here about the facts, his brief itself is not raising an issue about the sufficiency of the evidence that preceded his not not guilty finding, which he had raised in … There is no protected right to not be prosecuted for failure to comply with the Registration Act.

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Whitewater Draw v. Chad Wolf

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2021

    District Court correctly held that plaintiff's claims are not subject to the federal court's limited jurisdiction under the Administrative Procedure Act in Article 3. … And the district court commented there was not a special review statute. This is hypothetical. I'm trying to figure out whether these, if they had, let's suppose they commented on the rules.

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Gordon Davenport v. Carolyn Colvin

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2015

    I guess we'd be having a different conversation if the judge had discussed Rita Webb's comments, Ms. Galt's comments, Dr. … So this is not a short-lived couple-month period of time. This is a lengthy period of time. What would be the remedy in that case?

    28 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Google, Incorporated v. James Hood, III

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2015

    It's full of a lot of atmospherics where they're telling the public, we're going to make sure Google's clean. … And the Supreme Court said, no, there's not an exhaustion requirement under 1983, period. Your first point about threats would be piecemeal.

    49 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Lopez-Bazante v. Gonzales

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2007

    What you have to look at are, you know, whether his expressions of remorse, you have to look at his good – you know, whether there's a period of good conduct, how long that period is. … But in addition, under the Real ID Act, this Court can review questions of law. And in Ramadan and other decisions. Sorry?

    21 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Rucho v. Common Cause

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 26, 2019

    And that two-thirds number is not drawn out of thin air. … And implicit in Justice Kagan's comments is the idea, is it not, that you have to choose one that honors proportional representation.

    71 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Essar Steel Limited v. United States

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2014

    The Statement of Administrative Act, cited by both sides in this appeal, uses this type of information as an example for the need for corroboration. … That document sets forth nine separate subsidies that, on its face, appear to have been granted by the state government of Chattisgarh during this period. It was a viable policy during that period.

    28 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Marley v. United States

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2008

    Marley complied with the two-year time period under the Federal Tort Claims Act for bringing an administrative claim and when that claim was turned down, he then complied with the six-year, six-month statute … He's saying, Mr. – Notwithstanding his comment that he's giving an opinion.

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Carpenters Local Union 721 v. Phil Limon

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2020

    The Court asked for comments on the Ninth Circuit's decision in trial week, and so I was prepared to start with that, if the Court would like, and launch right into that one. … In other words, you can't have federal question jurisdiction sort of out in the air.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — 26 Beverly Glen, LLC v. Wykoff Newberg Corp.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2009

    And that aspect, that act of crossing it out, is at the very least ambiguous. It could mean what I think you're getting at. … And it was accepted when airing for initial Nelson's changes. And it was accepted also orally when- So we now have an oral agreement, do we not? We have both in this case, Your Honor. Pardon?

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Thomas Boothe v. City of Vancouver

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2014

    I mean, that seemed to be in the air, but it was more what he said to her. … Well, the act of declaring a mistrial necessarily invalidated three days of trial and all the preparation associated with that trial.

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Frederick Price v. John Stossel

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2010

    We know that the Supreme Court in Mason found that falsely attributed self-condemnatory comments are absolutely per se actionable. Was the anti-SLAPP motion solely on the issue of falsity? … And we sought it because we thought if we can have a look at the tape that Ole Anthony sent to ABC, we would know precisely whether ABC was truthful when John Stossel went on the air and said, at the time

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Sayed Omargharib v. Eric Holder, Jr.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 16, 2014

    I have two comments. … So this aspect's really up in the air right now, and... Okay. We are where we are. Thanks. Thank you. Appreciate your candor. All right, Ms. Lewis. First, yes.

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — YANGZHOU BESTPAK v. United States

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2013

    And if the number was picked out of thin air, which it possibly may have been, you would have had a chance. I mean, where do they come from? Your Honor, we have several points, Your Honor. … Is that comment accurate? It is... That you put yourself into a precarious situation by only selecting two mandatory respondents?

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — First Niagara Ins v. First Niagara

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2006

    two things In order to have trademark protection Or to oppose a trademark Advertising and the provision of services And the advertising has to be In connection with the provision of services Any final comments … commerce Or the instrumentalities of commerce Or is there an effect on commerce And our position is that We are involved in all three We are involved in the channels Because we are involved in roads And air

    39 min of audio
  • Oral argument — NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2005

    And at the time, the Supreme Court was not prompted to act on it. … In Kirby, for example, the most recent case that Norfolk Southern cited, a federal act, the Carriage of Goods by the Sea Act, fixed limits of liability.

    47 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Katie Van v. LLR, Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2020

    In addition to that, we also brought a claim under the Alaska Unfair Trade Practices Act. … Counsel, I couldn't hear your last comment. Forgive me.

    22 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Albemarle Corporation v. United States

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2016

    If the statute hasn't spoken directly to how the calculations should be made, then Commerce is given discretion to the extent that it's acting reasonably. … But not for the period in question. But it doesn't need to be for the period in question.

    51 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Pacific Gas and Electric Company v. FERC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2024

    But this has been a dispute between the parties back and forth for this entire period of time. … And that's particularly a problem given the Raker Act, given Congress's intent not just to provide a source of clean power, but also to ensure competition in the power market in the city.

    83 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Francis Guerra Pleitez

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2017

    Well, but wasn't the third addendum amount predicated on the Fair Labor Standards Act and not on actual earnings? … , and that it should be the higher of the gain to the defendants or the Fair Labor Standards Act, the probation officer.

    27 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.