Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.13s
Oral argument — Kaken Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. v. Iancu
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2020
What do you do about the fact that the board clearly aired when it said onychomycosis includes superficial mycosis? I think when you read the... It would have been better if the board was clearer. … arguing today the opposite of what the director is arguing, that is we're seeking to prove infringement of a claim that has onychomycosis, and we're seeking for it to cover just an infection of skin, those comments
40 min of audioOral argument — 1000 Friends of Wisconsin, Inc v. Wisconsin Department of Trans
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2016
These are both actors in this National Environmental Policy Act context. … This project that the expansion proposed, the wetland delineations, the air and water impacts are all described.
45 min of audioOral argument — Matthew Griffin v. Nadine Bryant
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2022
But of course, if they haven't acted upon it, you don't have that piece of paper. … The intent of the Prison Litigation Reform Act? The intent is you're talking about.
49 min of audioOral argument — Dan Oliver v. SD-3C LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2013
It's some long-ago period of time, continuing to, and this is what you, I'm sure, are going to address, continuing to recommit that act or commit new acts, and then say, well, wait a minute, we have absolute … So as in this case where the last overt acts of the conspirators are public, outside the limitations period, and the anti-competitive effects got rolling long before the limitations period that applies
26 min of audioOral argument — Pacific Coast Federation of Fi v. Gary Locke
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 7, 2012
Here they proceeded coextensively for a period of time. They were initiated at different periods of time. … There's a shell game going on in which the comment that you might want to make about 20 really applies to 21, and the comment you might want to make about 21 applied to 20, and the comment period is closed
43 min of audioOral argument — Perfect 10 v. CCBill LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2006
Well, the reason for that is that we were actually blocked, of course, as you're aware, from the record for a period of up to a year. … It just wasn't complied with in one clean, neat document. All in one document. So, we have a seriatim rule. I'm sorry. Where was the penalty of perjury?
62 min of audioOral argument — Tynnetta Dean-Lis v. John McHugh
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2015
during a period when you're not in that environment? … Is this an organizational act or is this just the EEOC law?
35 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Close
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2022
As a union-represented employee, she was subject to a probationary period of 150 days. … I think it may have been a comment that was a random comment, a stray comment made by somebody who used it for judgment.
61 min of audioOral argument — Rucho v. Common Cause
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 26, 2019
And that two-thirds number is not drawn out of thin air. … And implicit in Justice Kagan's comments is the idea, is it not, that you have to choose one that honors proportional representation.
71 min of audioOral argument — Western Watersheds Project v. Amy Lueders
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 20, 2017
It's also the period when there's breeding and nesting going on. … The agency is supposed to get all sorts of public comment, and comment from the local government, and then it may change the project quite a bit based on these comments.
35 min of audioOral argument — Radford v. Brand
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 16, 2007
That's the one that pretty well triggered his reaction, but he still didn't act until June. And he should have acted. Is that Mr. Asuna? That's Mr. Asuna. … He should have acted more quickly, but I would point out there that the failure to act more quickly didn't harm Ms.
33 min of audioOral argument — Intel/Microsoft v. Commonwealth Scienti
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2006
You made a satisfactory comment. We were satisfied, commercial but not based on. That's right, and that's the lower threshold. I'm not going to sit here and argue that that is a... … In other words, there is an allegation that a commercial tort has happened, and the DJ action seeks to clear the air over that commercial tort.
69 min of audioOral argument — David Unruh v. Rick Hall, Warden
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 6, 2014
Thus, to the extent Appellee rests on such comments to support its claim that no sentencing error was committed in this case, those comments should be disregarded. … First of all, any criminal who commits an act of attempted murder with the use of a gun or an assault commits an act of extreme violence frighteningly disproportionate...
25 min of audioOral argument — Lauri Howe v. Robert C. Litwack
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2014
And those are things which were litigated, aired, and a statement was made by the state court judge on more than one occasion saying, No, he hasn't exceeded his authority. … Would that be limited to acting within the bounds of his official duties? Well, yes, I think it would.
48 min of audioOral argument — Coal City Redi-Mix Company v. Pontiac Exchange, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 26, 2014
The pawnbroker, usually on a fairly short-term basis, as in this case, I believe the redemption period of the transaction was made September 17th. The redemption period was October 17th. … Well, Justice Schmidt commented that if there's a good faith arm's length transaction, that their due process rights should be allowed.
38 min of audioOral argument — Oganesov v. Mukasey
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2009
The decision of the judge was upheld without comment by the Board of Immigration Appeals. … It was a criminal act, not political persecution. Well, I don't see the criminal act here.
20 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Allergan
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2018
What if we actually asked HHS to weigh in and say, during this time period, what was your understanding? And then let you guys comment on what they comment on. … Actually, the statement of issues refers to the false claims act. It doesn't refer to any state false claims act. But aren't they coextensive?
31 min of audioOral argument — Richard Gilman v. Arnold Schwarzenegger
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 12, 2010
As you know, this case involves California Proposition 9, otherwise known as the Victims' Bill of Rights Act of 2008, Marcy's Law, which amended California Penal Code Section 3041.5 to increase the time … We appreciate your comments and we'll hear from Ms. Knox. Thank you. Monica Knox for the prisoners. Good morning. I'd like to make a few factual comments on some of the issues that came up.
30 min of audioOral argument — Insurance Marketing Coalition Limited v. Federal Communications Commission
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 18, 2024
Your Honors, this case concerns the meaning of the phrase prior express consent under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, or TCPA. … People were accidentally consenting, I'll put air quotes around that, to calls they didn't want. So the implementation is some policy work from the agency.
34 min of audioOral argument — David Heinz v. Carrington Mortgage Services
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2020
There are two short statutes as part of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act that we analyzed. The first is 15 U.S.C. 1692E. … In the less than a year period, it's a 10 month period from Carrington starting servicing the loan to their foreclosure.
30 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.