Documents

Oral argument — +Dippin' Dots v. Mosey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2006

In light of the comments of the board, his comments were completely accurate. It's what the board said. Now, I'm troubled by the Supreme Court opinion where he talks about what Mr. … But the judge still assessed legal fees under the Clayton Act.

Oral argument — Laboratory Corp. of America v. Davis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 29, 2025

One of the problems with an overly aggressive use of class certification is that it interferes with that law enforcement discretion by deputizing literally thousands of plaintiffs' lawyers to act as private … Period. I mean, that's our judgment.

Oral argument — Z Technologies Corp v. The Lubrizol Corp

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2014

During that period, Lockhart marched up in increments the price of wax oxidates over 70%. … The consent order is issued for public comment and becomes finalized after a public comment.

Oral argument — Karen Santiago v. Honeywell International, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 15, 2022

That's given to the district courts through the Judiciary Act. How in the equity power can a court fashion a remedy that allows you to break the law? … I look forward to you telling me that principle of law, and it may exist, that a third person is allowed to go without FBL's permission and manipulate and remove and take possession of, for some period

Oral argument — S&M Brands, Inc. v. State of Georgia Ex Rel.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 17, 2018

Like the state's Federal Trade Commission Act, which allows all kinds of injunctive relief for deceptive practices. … What if the deceptive practice were not discovered for many years, and in the intervening period, people incurred significant health damages as a result of relying on a deceptive advertisement?

Oral argument — Oberthur Tech. of America Corp v. NLRB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2017

It was one supervisor who made that comment. The language, there are cases the board has filed in the past. … It was no longer as if you were making a decision during the period.

Oral argument — Arnold v. Town of Camillus, New York

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2025

I guess her argument is she's describing various offensive acts by this guy that taken together show that over an eight-year period, he was harassing her frequently. And Mr. … I think we've got your comments very well in mind. Thank you, we'll reserve a decision.

Oral argument — Tracey Edwards v. Benita Witherspoon

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2025

So maybe I've just forgotten, but this is the first time that I recall an ADA claim being aired up with a deliberate indifference claim under the Eighth Amendment that I've been on the panel on. … Period, without saying, well, you know, you're still in postpartum, doesn't matter, you're still dealing with that.

Oral argument — United States v. Heron

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

How about no objection at trial, no comment by the district judge, and the only comment by the district judge at all that might be seen contemporaneous is the nice job, guys, comment. … The government had to have shown that with some greater specificity that there was actually some non-public information in that relevant period on which he could have acted.

Oral argument — United States v. Jasmine Bradley

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2024

And my comment to you is how do you respond that this additional reasonable time deals with efforts to restore the defendant? She doesn't need restored here. It just doesn't seem like a fit. … The Insanity Defense Reform Act simply does not provide the sort of remedy that the defendant is asking for here.

Oral argument — Christine Moorehead v. Hi-Health Supermart Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2018

We have three or four comments over a period of time. She alleges that those are just examples of comments that were made to her over and over and over again, right? … And if you take those facts as true, there was a pattern of these discriminatory ageist comments that persisted for a period of months and months. And Ms.

Oral argument — City of Hearne, Texas v. Milton Johnson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 6, 2018

Rodney Burns, the 1976 Supreme Court case, which says the loss of First Amendment freedoms for even minimal periods of time unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury. … But you still got your petition in front of the city council, and the city council still acted on or prepared to act on the merits of it one way or the other.

Oral argument — Argueta Anariba v. Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 21, 2022

as the Attorney General, Attorney General's delegates are clear and therefore no air deference is afforded. … First of all, you have an expert act for David that was not addressed at all, which is problematic at its core. You want to address that?

Oral argument — People v. Gallard

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 29, 2016

Isn't this also consistent with our defendant here just firing into the air, just firing into the sky? … Third, as far as this being a premeditated act, again, it's sort of besides the point. We don't know what the intended act was. Was it to kill? Was it to scare? Was it to hurt?

Oral argument — Braunstein v. Sahara Plaza, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2022

As a union-represented employee, she was subject to a probationary period of 150 days. … I think it may have been a comment that was a random comment, a stray comment made by somebody who used poor judgment.

Oral argument — Porada v. Lavelle

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 11, 2018

The illegal, her comment about illegal refers to A and B. … I think the exact language is something to the effect that it was dismissed pursuant to the Act, that is the what we'll call the Citizens Participatory Act, and alternatively under 2615.

Oral argument — Hovhanesyan v. Holder

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2008

It says there's a period before the 6-18. … , period.

Oral argument — Niveen Ismail v. County of Orange

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2017

It really requires an allegation of some overt act that occurred within a period of one month. Isn't that what it comes down to? Within one month? One month. … Well, Your Honor, I would just comment.

Oral argument — District Hospital Partners v. Sylvia Mathews Burwell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 12, 2015

Could I ask you, the district court relied in part on the fact that the interim final rule was not a final rule as such and that during the comment period the secretary was unprompted by any comments either … with interest that's unprecedented, it doesn't exist anywhere else in the Medicare program where the agency can go back and impose interest what was made years ago under the debt collection improvement act

Oral argument — United States v. Kenneth Ravenell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2023

that we don't even need, and those overt acts go into the limitations period. … period?