Documents

Oral argument — Svec v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity & Benefit Fund

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 19, 2025

She continued to work for a period. She went off for a period after that due to an unrelated injury. This was not the cause of her disability. … I echo Justice Reyes's comments, both of you gentlemen. Very good presentation. Thank you.

Oral argument — Rica Gatore v. DHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2022

A double negative But it shows the district court was aware of this group This group deserves a remedy Class actions protect people who are unaware of their rights Remember the Fair Credit Reporting Act … Cleveland What's your best case in support of your argument That plaintiffs who have individually received relief May nonetheless act as class representatives To obtain class certification And litigate

Oral argument — Gerald Brown v. Billy Nolen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2022

Billy Nolen, Acting Administrator in Federal Aviation Administration. Ms. Candelario for the petitioner and Mr. Stevenson for the respondents. Good morning, Council. Ms. … You know, they they indisputably did not take the required rest periods because they have to decide to keep Mr. Brown out of the cockpit.

Oral argument — Moke America LLC v. Moke International Limited

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2024

You can go to the definition of trademark in the Lanham Act it's any word, name, symbol device or combination I have the red light is it okay if I continue? … Two other points I want to make in response to my worthy adversary's comments. Number one, at the beginning of the trial, the judge even says the only issue here is priority.

Oral argument — Philip Cannon v. Polk County District Attorney

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 10, 2012

It says within the applicable time period provided in subsection 2, and that's back up there, 180 days. … Do you have any comment on the — do you have any comment on whether the statute of repose negligent injury to person or property is limited to negligent injury to person or property? No, frankly.

Oral argument — Capitol Specialty Insurance Corporation v. Steadfast Insurance Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2025

into the policy period as required. … There is a very generic comment in the file that I think counsel is referring to. It doesn't even name Military Road.

Oral argument — Robert Underhill v. Huntington National Bank

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 30, 2014

Well, I think 727E allows a one-year period for that discharge to be revoked. … There was a comment in the deposition of Beth Underhill. And the question was, when did she learn of the acts of defendants? She answered April of 2009. It wasn't specific.

Oral argument — People v. Hunter

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 16, 2013

persons in the same location and within a short period of time Which I think speaks to the time and place element of it While it's correct that in the majority of the cases which are cited in our briefs … goods stolen from four or five different places Well, I would say that The committee comments would suggest that that would be multiple acts that the elements would be different that there are different

Oral argument — United States v. Michael Shirley

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2025

It's got to be before that act. … I just think that comment was a throwout comment that was a little confusing, but I think I understand why he made that comment.

Oral argument — Zahner v. Sec Public Welfare

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 20, 2014

That was, in effect, up until the Deficit Reduction Act of 2006. What a Medicaid planner would do would be to you have a person who needs to go into a nursing home. … Just two other brief comments, Your Honors, or one other brief comment.

Oral argument — People ex rel. R & D Olson Limited Partnership v. Village of Glendale Heights

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2013

At that point in time, then, Bloomingdale, their petitions would then come to have significance and could then be acted upon. Certainly, after the time period of 60 days having expired. … Judge, based on, based on the fact, and could you just, if I could briefly comment on justification? Quickly.

Oral argument — Richard Houston v. City of Atlanta

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 14, 2018

Houston is arguing that the sexual comments constitute a basis of the intentional infliction of emotional distress, we believe those claims are time-barred, as the sexual comments occurred almost more … In the same time period, Sergeant McKenzie opens up her own OPS complaint against Sergeant Houston.

Oral argument — Lavoho, L.L.C. v. Apple Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 23, 2017

Silbert is going to get up here and say about contemporaneous comments, I would implore the court to look at the comments that Mr. Silbert alludes to in his brief. … But prior comments on a website, to the extent that they even do contradict what Mr.

Oral argument — City of Calumet City v. Workers' Compensation Commission Embrey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 20, 2014

Can I comment on, you're giving us a very long, detailed history. You're challenging the second period of TTD when it commenced, correct? Yes. Isn't that what you're, and Dr. … The reason why I raise that is we have a case that says the Act only authorizes penalties for nonpayment of compensation. It does not authorize penalties for anything else.

Oral argument — United States v. Raquan Scott

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 30, 2026

And if it was used before or after, under this case, they keep focusing on while committing, they say during, and it says it doesn't include the acts that do not constitute elements. … And your hypothetical Judge Heitens is exactly correct that propping open a door or window is just as much of a use as firing into the air or into the ground or against a victim.

Oral argument — Charles J. Mayberry v. Michael A. Dittmann

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 5, 2018

Here, we know that Mayberry was able to act upon his legal rights during the tolling period because he filed other documents during that time, and as in this Court's Foster case, Mayberry offers no explanation … And I would just like to comment on the… Well, those were issues raised and found competent to stand trial. In 2004? In 2004. Yes, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Parkdale Intl v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2006

If it's passage by new rule, notice, and comment, that's right. … However, their comments sent to Commerce in April 2002 demonstrate differently.

Oral argument — Secretary of the Army v. StructSure Projects, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2025

So if the delay in the 13-month period was caused by the government as a contractor, then you get money for it. If it was caused by the government acting as a sovereign, you don't. … Let me clarify one of my comments earlier that I think got this off track. I'm not suggesting that the government breached the original contract. I'm saying that the government...

Oral argument — Valinda Streater v. Matthew Wilson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2014

You have a gentleman with a knife coming at the officer in open air, so to speak. He can go left. He can go right. … Cooper, and in that case, they didn't find for qualified immunity, and again, I think it came to the point of there was no overt act or act of aggression that would cause an officer, a reasonable officer

Oral argument — Eloise Hitchcock v. Cumberland Univ 403(B) D

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2017

Appellants allege that the university's misconduct violates the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, ERISA. … My name is Blair Byram, and I represent the Acting Secretary of Labor, Ed Huebler, as amicus curiae.