Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

3.36s

  • Oral argument — West Suburban Bank v. Advantage Financial Partners, LLC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 1, 2014

    You still have the period of—here, I'm drawing a blank on it there—the period of redemption, the period of reinstatement, and you still have the notice of sale. … I went and looked up the definitions for the Private Detective Act. And the Private Detective Act has a whole series of definitions for a private detective agency.

    47 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Da

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 14, 2017

    Basically what we're looking to do is have the underlying decision regarding restitution only overturned in light of the fact that there is non-compliance with the Mandatory Victim Recovery Act of 1996 … The Court said within the 90-day period.

    20 min of audio
  • Oral argument — General Motors Corporation v. The Motor Vehicle Review Board

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2013

    It says it shall be an unfair act or practice to grant an additional franchise in a market. Period. So had you granted a franchise without going through the hoops, that would be better. Absolutely. … But not just if anything, it's not just in the air, devoid from any connection whatsoever. Let's just take the word consent order, Your Honor.

    47 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Pamela Follen v. Comm of Social Security

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2025

    And also, she pointed out that the judge made some comments at step five. … At step five, he made a comment saying, well, the claimant can still perform more than occasional contact for a period of time.

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Smith

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 21, 2025

    They were spoon feeding the prosecutor's theory to the jury and in essence, acting as deputy prosecutors to argue the case when the only proper place to make arguments like is in closing argument. … What evidence was there about that period?

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Avedis Djeredjian

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2013

    We don't know whether Burton was acting on his own as a very sophisticated informant. We don't know whether he was represented by counsel. … This is perfectly clean, and the deacon paid his debt and doesn't owe the government any money anymore.

    46 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Public Utility Dist. 1 of Snoh. Cnty. v. BPA

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2005

    So they're relying on the DSI comments. … In the record of decision, we go into these things in great detail on many, many issues that were raised during the two-year process and the comment period for the settlements themselves.

    56 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Prieto v. Paul Revere Ins.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 7, 2003

    And the commentators are all ---- What's unequal about it? … I think the judge was acting appropriately when she concluded the parties had, by implied consent, tried that issue.

    49 min of audio
  • Oral argument — HRSA-ILA Funds v. Adidas AG

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2025

    Here, the conduct from 2013 to 2018 did not cause harm, and in fact, in that period, there are allegations that Mr. … And there's no allegation that in any way harm to Adidas was imminent during that whole four-year period.

    26 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Marcos Bahena

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 6, 2023

    We're reviewing it here for plain air. … I think the Forensic Witness Act, there was another expert who did testify. I thought that ended up through stipulation. Once the witness started, there was the concern.

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Randolph Wolfson v. Colleen Concannon

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2015

    And the comments to the Code say the same thing. … Are you distinguishing between the period of campaigning as to everybody who may be a non-campaign period sitting judge, or are you distinguishing within the campaign period between incumbents who are

    65 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Thomas Boothe v. City of Vancouver

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2014

    I mean, that seemed to be in the air, but it was more what he said to her. … Well, the act of declaring a mistrial necessarily invalidated three days of trial and all the preparation associated with that trial.

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Carpenters Local Union 721 v. Phil Limon

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2020

    The Court asked for comments on the Ninth Circuit's decision in trial week, and so I was prepared to start with that, if the Court would like, and launch right into that one. … In other words, you can't have federal question jurisdiction sort of out in the air.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — YANGZHOU BESTPAK v. United States

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2013

    And if the number was picked out of thin air, which it possibly may have been, you would have had a chance. I mean, where do they come from? Your Honor, we have several points, Your Honor. … Is that comment accurate? It is... That you put yourself into a precarious situation by only selecting two mandatory respondents?

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Sayed Omargharib v. Eric Holder, Jr.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 16, 2014

    I have two comments. … So this aspect's really up in the air right now, and... Okay. We are where we are. Thanks. Thank you. Appreciate your candor. All right, Ms. Lewis. First, yes.

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — 26 Beverly Glen, LLC v. Wykoff Newberg Corp.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2009

    And that aspect, that act of crossing it out, is at the very least ambiguous. It could mean what I think you're getting at. … And it was accepted when airing for initial Nelson's changes. And it was accepted also orally when- So we now have an oral agreement, do we not? We have both in this case, Your Honor. Pardon?

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Frederick Price v. John Stossel

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2010

    We know that the Supreme Court in Mason found that falsely attributed self-condemnatory comments are absolutely per se actionable. Was the anti-SLAPP motion solely on the issue of falsity? … And we sought it because we thought if we can have a look at the tape that Ole Anthony sent to ABC, we would know precisely whether ABC was truthful when John Stossel went on the air and said, at the time

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Peter Kanefsky v. Ford Motor Co Retirement Plan

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2023

    Is it intent to induce someone to act? … And your comment that you are considering how equitable estoppel should be applied under a 1974 law, ERISA.

    39 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Oscar Marquez

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2022

    On the Speedy Trial Act, I think what I'd like to do in the remaining time is just to point out that the simplest path here to a finding of a violation is that last period of time that is disputed between … and the excludable time ruling when a period of time is indirectly attributed to the Court's calendar, that itself is not a problem under the Speedy Trial Act.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Rushing

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 13, 2018

    And the other factor is that there was propensity evidence, prior acts of abuse in both of those cases. … We really don't even know the time period between her last period of consciousness and her discovering that the door was open. So there simply isn't any evidence about why he left.

    38 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.