Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

1.20s

  • Oral argument — CFTC v. James Donelson

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 18, 2024

    Donaldson's position not, not just run afoul everything the Commodity Exchange Act is about with respect to the registration of CTAs? That's the part I can't figure out. … Under the Supreme Court's discussion of agency guidance documents in the Kaiser case, since this document, since the various comment letters is the wrong word.

    40 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Boyd

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2010

    I'm not sure I understand the significance of that comment. Your Honor, what I understand is to read, and I believe was the testimony of Ms. … Act, which is routine.

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — CFTC v. Monex Credit Co.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2019

    Delivery to the depository is delivery under the Act. … That is something I wanted to ask about is your comment in response to his comments on example 2. So you may do that and then if there's any other questions. Okay.

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Farnam

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 10, 2011

    Their argument is based on a comment that he made to a girl at the party. … It was a comment made, and the fight didn't actually happen immediately after that.

    28 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Brandon Locke

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2019

    This is an act that occurs before the court, not in the lawyer's office, not in my client's home, the court. But there is a presumption of regularity, Judge Wilkinson. … There's nothing on the Fourth Circuit that is- We write this on a clean slate. Yes.

    54 min of audio
  • Oral argument — In Re Boy Scouts of America

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2022

    So that's gonna go on for a long period of time. … And I think what happened, Judge Ambrose, I think you even mentioned that there may be something that this court can clean up in this case. And I think that's exactly right.

    47 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Maurice Goudeau v. National Oilwell Varco, L.P.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2015

    Within that time span, his testimony shows that within that time period, these comments were made on a repeated basis. It wasn't just an isolated set of comments made on one occasion. … It was during this relevant period of time which ultimately led . . . Are the comments having to do with the old farts or are the comments having to do with I'm going to fire him.

    40 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Stuart Seugasala

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 14, 2017

    And under the list of overt acts, there's overt acts as well that weren't relevant to Mr. Camdevong and shouldn't have been read to or gone into the jury room for the jury to consider. … This is not an enhanced penalty as in the Armed Career Criminal Act, as in Johnson. This is a standalone charge.

    67 min of audio
  • Oral argument — DJ St. Jon v. Timothy Tatro

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2017

    We would love to be in the California Court of Appeals, but for 60 days the class was with their hands in the air literally calling their counsel saying, so what's going on? … I feel like I'm on a Lawrence Galk show with one act sitting down and the next act beginning. Well, you're all doing such a wonderful job. Doug Butts, Higgs Fletch, Romney. Wonderful, wonderful.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — In re: Akhlaghpour

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 13, 2025

    what we can do about it, a period during which Bankruptcy Council was appointed, you know, and was acting on behalf of a producer and was themselves a producer, as to which I think you're not going to … On remand, the Superior Court is directed to grant acting for leave to amend her complaint to state any claims based solely on Arante's conduct during the period she was a debtor out of possession and,

    43 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Hinda Dhirane

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2018

    And she operationally integrated into the A.S. organization and coordinated her own activities with A.S. broader organizational goals over a period spanning multiple years. … Well, but it did based on, essentially, a legal test that it came up with out of thin air. These were factual findings.

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Randall Callahan v. United States Dept. of HHS

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 22, 2019

    We think of jurisdiction probably, the best way to fit this case into subject matter jurisdiction probably isn't failure to act, but that the agency's final action is our response to the critical comment … There is no need to hastily change it within a brief period of time.

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — McGuire-Welch v. The House of

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 4, 2018

    And there are other indicia of reliability- For example, the retire comment, I think, is made by people who are relaying that they heard Ms. Perry say that. Is that correct? No. Ms. … Just one last comment. If an affidavit, like the one submitted by plaintiff in this case, is all it takes to for employers to be able to succeed on a motion in it.

    26 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Prabhat Goyal

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2010

    Collins, the former comptroller, in some sort of drive-by comment says, well, I personally didn't turn over, not the debit memos, I didn't turn over to them the buy-in letters. … Did they ever do anything other than sense that somehow in the air, Goyal must have known what was going on? Because I looked for specifics and I don't find very much. Well, Borman did actually.

    69 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Karin Kristensen v. United States

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2020

    Each of these three incorrect legal rulings cause reversible air, which is reviewed under the de novo standard. The court should reverse and render. … Those are exceptions to the Federal Tort Claims Act. Once the court finds the Federal Tort Claims Act applies, then those are exceptions that would have to be proved.

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Svec v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity & Benefit Fund

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 19, 2025

    She continued to work for a period. She went off for a period after that due to an unrelated injury. This was not the cause of her disability. … I echo Justice Reyes's comments, both of you gentlemen. Very good presentation. Thank you.

    51 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Tower Automotive v. The Workers' Compensation Commission

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2010

    The Illinois Workers' Compensation Act, though, is a remedial act that was created by statute. This act provides a fixed remedy for an employee to recover against his employer. … Act.

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Rica Gatore v. DHS

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2022

    A double negative But it shows the district court was aware of this group This group deserves a remedy Class actions protect people who are unaware of their rights Remember the Fair Credit Reporting Act … Cleveland What's your best case in support of your argument That plaintiffs who have individually received relief May nonetheless act as class representatives To obtain class certification And litigate

    48 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Philip Cannon v. Polk County District Attorney

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 10, 2012

    It says within the applicable time period provided in subsection 2, and that's back up there, 180 days. … Do you have any comment on the — do you have any comment on whether the statute of repose negligent injury to person or property is limited to negligent injury to person or property? No, frankly.

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Alcorta

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 20, 2022

    One would be the Strickland claim, where you're looking at the acts of the lawyer. … But I think the whole point, as I understand it, of the comment made with Judge Holmes and Judge Hartz is we're not talking about relevant conduct.

    35 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.