Documents

Oral argument — George Tershakovec v. Ford Motor Company, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 16, 2022

And I've tried to make as much sense of this as I can because there's a lot of balls in the air. … —But here we get into the Rules Enabling Act issue.

Oral argument — Michael Lewis v. County of San Diego

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 17, 2019

The house was cleaned up by 2 o'clock in the morning that night. … But there was a jury verdict against her about whether she acted reasonably, correct? About her conducts that day, whether she, so you can act. The jury found that she acted unreasonably.

Oral argument — Mueck v. La Grange Acquisitions

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2022

Jacob Field Services, that the ADA Amendments Act was a game changer. It completely changed this area of the law. That's where Congress had said, you know what, the courts are not doing this right. … And he's alleged that it virtually knocked him out completely from all activities, couldn't even clean his house or anything.

Oral argument — United States v. Hares Ahmadzai

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2010

McCormick's brief is arguing that that comment was referring to the previous instructions that were made by prior counsel when the case was originally set for trial. … I understand that the indictment charged a single act, and I don't disagree that it's focused on one act. But then the trial court has heard the evidence.

Oral argument — Elizabeth Sines v. Michael Hill

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2024

So they found predicate act four, predicate act five, specific damages for each of those distinct acts. … the underlying acts.

Oral argument — Smith v. Waukegan Park District

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 23, 2008

under the act? … James, is it a fair statement then that based on our decision in Buckner in 2109 that between the two of them the retaliatory discharge is no longer available, period, in the public setting?

Oral argument — County of Shoshone, Idaho v. USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2014

So we're looking at a five-year period between 1883 and 1893, correct? That is correct, Your Honor. Okay. … I think from the public comments, someone might have raised that kind of an issue, but I think the answer would have been that kind of issue has to be decided by a court in a quiet title act suit, and

Oral argument — Hodges v. Glenholme School

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 24, 2017

She was aware these acts occurred, but she was 13 years old when this started. It ended when she was 14. … at a young age might have repressed the memories for a significant period of time?

Oral argument — Neustar, Inc. v. FCC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2016

Would you go on to notice and comment? I took up some of your time with my question about technology. So would you say something about notice and comment? … The final RFP, again, had a six-week period. I think it's – this Court is well aware that it's essentially impossible to have a notice in time rulemaking in a six-week period.

Oral argument — Martha Lockett v. Houston Indep School District

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 5, 2018

What's the most biased example of the judge's comments? … , then the plaintiff can show a series of related acts, one or more of which falls in the limitation period, then she's okay.

Oral argument — Theresa Sweet v. Everglades College, Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2023

So, I mean, I think that the injury in fact part here is pretty established, but the redressability I don't think is clean. … At one point, it had denied 95% of class members' applications that it considered over about a 10-month period, and it sent form denial notices that didn't give any explanation to the borrowers for why

Oral argument — People v. Connor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 29, 2015

And I think it's like one of the comments made is like no comment I've ever seen before by a trial judge. … Show me that you didn't have it for the entire time period.

Oral argument — People for the Ethical Treatm v. HHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2017

And the court's very clear that the deference is because it is filed pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act. It's a different standard of review. … United, British, Amerijet, Air China, and South African. Now, sort of in the caption to that field, it suggests that they're listing one of airlines one of five of nine.

Oral argument — Regional Employers v. Sidney Charles

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

How am I going to counter a statement of thin air where there's no record whatsoever? Number two, they're a fiduciary. They have an obligation to account. … We say he acted in accordance with the plan. Can you condition the right of the employees to get cash value on demanding a release which really is not valid under law?

Oral argument — Circus Circus Casinos, Inc. v. NLRB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2019

So once the board decides, the employer is acting at its peril, as it does in a lot of cases. … Or the employer could say, we're not going to interview you, period, and discontinue the interview. All of those things would be permissible.

Oral argument — United States v. Michael Labrecque

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 14, 2011

Well, they have to, Irene has to have transferred away custody temporary for that period because we've all agreed that custody and control can be periodic and can shift for small periods of time. … The comment notes say so, no? I beg your pardon? The answer to Judge Pius's question is yes, because the comments to the guidelines say that. Correct. All right. Correct. So there's a presumption.

Oral argument — Kolkevich v. Atty Gen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2007

If I may, Your Honor, I was somewhat, with all due respect, somewhat perplexed by your comment that there was some time. … I have not understood that act to have created some kind of a, I forget what Your Honor said, a one-year period. After the passage.

Oral argument — Shoop v. Twyford

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 26, 2022

The court is not writing on a clean slate here. There is a broad spectrum of types of factual development that take place in the district court. … So if we return to the tiger man, so suppose that the order is to transport the tiger man from one part – all the way across the country for a period of treatment that's going to last for 45 days.

Oral argument — Garvy v. Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2012

Didn't he go so far as to say it would act as his detriment? Yes, he did. … And actually, the current comments to Rule 1.7 talk about various situations where conflicts are non-consentable.

Oral argument — Pacific Radiation Oncology, LLC v. The Queen's Medical Center

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 15, 2012

However, the summary judgment record establishes as a matter of law that the board acted on a basis of mixed motives. … Under the Sherman Act, for example? Yeah.