Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.47s
Oral argument — Bliesner v. The Communication Workers of America
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2006
And more than one person heard that comment, and more than one person testified to that comment. In the end, Ms. … So that's the person who allegedly was not acting with, who had made the remark that we wouldn't act with the same zeal.
41 min of audioOral argument — Empire Today v. Luna Carpet & Blinds Co.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2010
And if so, how do you measure the reasonableness of the time period? I'll answer. … Simply to keep an experienced salesman off the road so that he's immobilized for a period of time?
59 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Da
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 14, 2017
Basically what we're looking to do is have the underlying decision regarding restitution only overturned in light of the fact that there is non-compliance with the Mandatory Victim Recovery Act of 1996 … The Court said within the 90-day period.
20 min of audioOral argument — David Schlemm v. Brendan Pizzala
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2024
Schlemm, instead of filing his grievances, had come straight to this court, the state would be here telling you that he hadn't properly exhausted and PLRA acts as a bar to his suit. … Schlem's claims were timely filed, and I know with Judge Hamilton's comments, I might have a little bit of a hill to climb here.
21 min of audioOral argument — Kennedy, Sec. of H&HS v. Braidwood Mgmt., Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 21, 2025
One thing we all agree on is that the task force was unconstitutionally appointed for the 13-year period that began in March of 2010 when the Affordable Care Act was first enacted into law through June … Would you comment on Mr.
86 min of audioOral argument — Ralph Arthur v. Pet Dairy
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2014
So, the age comment and the discharge. Yes, sir. … She never requested a meeting concerning any driver, period. Any driver, period. Mike Reynolds said, I want you to help me get rid of me. And then she went along with it.
39 min of audioOral argument — Gerald Brown v. Billy Nolen
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2022
Billy Nolen, Acting Administrator in Federal Aviation Administration. Ms. Candelario for the petitioner and Mr. Stevenson for the respondents. Good morning, Council. Ms. … You know, they they indisputably did not take the required rest periods because they have to decide to keep Mr. Brown out of the cockpit.
33 min of audioOral argument — General Motors Corporation v. The Motor Vehicle Review Board
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2013
It says it shall be an unfair act or practice to grant an additional franchise in a market. Period. So had you granted a franchise without going through the hoops, that would be better. Absolutely. … But not just if anything, it's not just in the air, devoid from any connection whatsoever. Let's just take the word consent order, Your Honor.
47 min of audioOral argument — Pamela Follen v. Comm of Social Security
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2025
And also, she pointed out that the judge made some comments at step five. … At step five, he made a comment saying, well, the claimant can still perform more than occasional contact for a period of time.
31 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Smith
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 21, 2025
They were spoon feeding the prosecutor's theory to the jury and in essence, acting as deputy prosecutors to argue the case when the only proper place to make arguments like is in closing argument. … What evidence was there about that period?
32 min of audioOral argument — Time Warner v. FCC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009
Right, and absolutely we agree, and to the extent that the applicable question was up in the air and the FCC does indeed have a lot of expertise, there's no question. … The fact is, however, Earthlink went to the FCC during the entire 12-month transition period and explained to the FCC what in fact had occurred.
72 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Avedis Djeredjian
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2013
We don't know whether Burton was acting on his own as a very sophisticated informant. We don't know whether he was represented by counsel. … This is perfectly clean, and the deacon paid his debt and doesn't owe the government any money anymore.
46 min of audioOral argument — Edenfield v. New Orleans City
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2025
So, you know, isn't the city entitled to say that a police officer should not be posting this kind of comment about lawless and riotous behavior, period? … Thus, the period was told. I'm just saying, if the case has said that, I'm going to read it. So, we do also cite Hillard v.
43 min of audioOral argument — Stupp Corporation v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2021
How much, let's assume, or assume for purposes of this question, that commerce acted within its discretion in rejecting certain portions of your case brief. … Well, you know, commerce asked for comments after Xanthan gone. And the comment I made, I submitted 50 something pages of comments, which, and the conclusion was you should use a nonparametric test.
41 min of audioOral argument — In re the Marriage of White
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2011
McNally used the period which included the worst performing months in a five-year period? Wasn't that one of the criticisms? No, it was not. … Anybody have any comments? No. All right. May I proceed? Thank you, Your Honor. May it please the Court, I'd like to start my remarks working backwards from the comments that the Court had asked Mr.
39 min of audioOral argument — Randolph Wolfson v. Colleen Concannon
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2015
And the comments to the Code say the same thing. … Are you distinguishing between the period of campaigning as to everybody who may be a non-campaign period sitting judge, or are you distinguishing within the campaign period between incumbents who are
65 min of audioOral argument — Peter Kanefsky v. Ford Motor Co Retirement Plan
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2023
Is it intent to induce someone to act? … And your comment that you are considering how equitable estoppel should be applied under a 1974 law, ERISA.
39 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Rogers
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2025
And I think they did that in other provisions in the Protect Act where they didn't say modify the commentary, modify the guideline itself. And so exact same act. … I'd like to, if I may, start by pushing back a little more on the plane air question.
61 min of audioOral argument — Elliot Anderson v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 20, 2020
It was air for the court to engage in fact finding for an indivisible offense. … objection so we don't know that certainly the record doesn't give have any direct evidence that there was this was a residual class and now beeman also contemplated if there's no direct evidence like a comment
34 min of audioOral argument — People v. Rushing
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 13, 2018
And the other factor is that there was propensity evidence, prior acts of abuse in both of those cases. … We really don't even know the time period between her last period of consciousness and her discovering that the door was open. So there simply isn't any evidence about why he left.
38 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.