Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Da

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 14, 2017

Basically what we're looking to do is have the underlying decision regarding restitution only overturned in light of the fact that there is non-compliance with the Mandatory Victim Recovery Act of 1996 … The Court said within the 90-day period.

Oral argument — People v. Puckett

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2012

And why doesn't this require a charge of domestic violence so that we're not pulling harassment of sorts out of the air? Or you're arguing he was talking loudly and Mr. … It was not, the trial court did not rely on that act as an act of harassment.

Oral argument — Jones v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 3, 2021

And the next day they cleaned and repainted his cell and didn't collect any evidence there. And the Tenth Circuit held there that no spoliation sanctions would have been appropriate. … He continued on for a brief period, looked up, saw another person who ended up being Mr. Murray about 200 yards from him. So the space between Officer Norton and Mr.

Oral argument — United States v. Pabon, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2015

She had a concern to protect the kids out there, and she said she commented on his anger issues. She never commented on his sexual impulse issues, on whether he needed sexual offender treatment. … It's re-offending, period.

Oral argument — Shasteen v. Shelby Memorial Hospital

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 14, 2010

That provision was eliminated as a result of the Tort Reform Act and the Best v. Taylor machine. … It was in the hands of everyone within the 90-day period of time.

Oral argument — Hurst v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 21, 2020

We wouldn't be here because we're not seeking coverage under a prior policy period. … That's your only evidence that he was acting as an agent. Now, obviously, he was a selling agent.

Oral argument — Valinda Streater v. Matthew Wilson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2014

You have a gentleman with a knife coming at the officer in open air, so to speak. He can go left. He can go right. … Cooper, and in that case, they didn't find for qualified immunity, and again, I think it came to the point of there was no overt act or act of aggression that would cause an officer, a reasonable officer

Oral argument — Theresa Sweet v. Everglades College, Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2023

So, I mean, I think that the injury in fact part here is pretty established, but the redressability I don't think is clean. … At one point, it had denied 95% of class members' applications that it considered over about a 10-month period, and it sent form denial notices that didn't give any explanation to the borrowers for why

Oral argument — Randolph Wolfson v. Colleen Concannon

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2015

And the comments to the Code say the same thing. … Are you distinguishing between the period of campaigning as to everybody who may be a non-campaign period sitting judge, or are you distinguishing within the campaign period between incumbents who are

Oral argument — Tijani v. Wayne K. Interim Dir.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2005

But that opinion, you know, in the opinion, it's only sort of like a passing comment. I don't know if we consider that a finding of fact. Well, Mr. … Kim concurrence, akin to the one under the Bail Reform Act, and that standard was articulated by this Court in U.S. v.

Oral argument — People v. Rushing

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 13, 2018

And the other factor is that there was propensity evidence, prior acts of abuse in both of those cases. … We really don't even know the time period between her last period of consciousness and her discovering that the door was open. So there simply isn't any evidence about why he left.

Oral argument — Peter Kanefsky v. Ford Motor Co Retirement Plan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2023

Is it intent to induce someone to act? … And your comment that you are considering how equitable estoppel should be applied under a 1974 law, ERISA.

Oral argument — League of Conservation Voters v. Donald Trump

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2020

And all of what we both read, of course, all of us read about the air guns. Hence my question, following up on Judge Watford's view of the applicable standard. Is there something you Yes. … It's not, it was a withdrawal without a definite expiration for that time period. That's not the same as permanent.

Oral argument — Olagues v. Icahn Associates Ho

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 14, 2016

This case arises out of Section 16b of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the short-swing insider trading profits rule, and specifically Rule 16b6d. … And if that's the way we're going to now avoid Section 16B, by just making up numbers out of air, well, then it's just useless. This statute was adopted in 1934, right? Indeed.

Oral argument — General Motors Corporation v. The Motor Vehicle Review Board

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2013

It says it shall be an unfair act or practice to grant an additional franchise in a market. Period. So had you granted a franchise without going through the hoops, that would be better. Absolutely. … But not just if anything, it's not just in the air, devoid from any connection whatsoever. Let's just take the word consent order, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Lopez-Bazante v. Gonzales

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2007

What you have to look at are, you know, whether his expressions of remorse, you have to look at his good – you know, whether there's a period of good conduct, how long that period is. … But in addition, under the Real ID Act, this Court can review questions of law. And in Ramadan and other decisions. Sorry?

Oral argument — Bangaly v. Baggiani

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 16, 2014

The Wrongful Death Act, as counsel said, the Wrongful Death Act looks to compensate the survivor. … Reuter, who signed a retainer agreement with him, made a motion to replace him as the heir, so I would say we have to run from that time period. And that was what time period?

Oral argument — Center for Biological v. Norton

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 17, 2006

And then give the public notice, get comment, and list it. Well, we do have to have the comment period. The agency has to respond to the comments. How hard is that? Well, it all takes resources. … It includes the responding to comments. And we get comments from all sides here. Publishing costs in the Federal Register. And we have to deal with the critical habitat issue.

Oral argument — Mueck v. La Grange Acquisitions

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2022

Jacob Field Services, that the ADA Amendments Act was a game changer. It completely changed this area of the law. That's where Congress had said, you know what, the courts are not doing this right. … And he's alleged that it virtually knocked him out completely from all activities, couldn't even clean his house or anything.

Oral argument — Anthony Sully v. Robert Ayers, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 16, 2013

It was not necessarily the acts themselves, although the acts were pretty egregious, and threats against his daughter saying you're going to find her in a little box. I was a police officer. … They were like, you know, people who cleaned his, who drove his truck or something. Your Honor. And actually, the wax tap thing was really egregious.