Documents

Oral argument — Row 1 Inc. v. Xavier Becerra

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2023

After Congress authorized the expansion of telehealth services under Medicaid, the agency published an interim final rule at a comment period, considered those comments, offered reasons responses, published … In a normal agency situation, if you think an agency's acting pursuant to a rule that is either impermissible or was not properly promulgated, you would ask for notice and comment rulemaking, set up the

Oral argument — Sean Rambert, Sr. v. City of Greenville

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 20, 2023

Well, first of all, he had fired a fourth shot in the air by accident. But by the time he fired shot seven and eight, then is the point at which Mr. … Also, the comment about Mr. Rambert suffering from schizophrenia, Officer Johnson did not know that. His comment was, I heard him shout and scream. I looked at him.

Oral argument — City & County of S.F. v. USCIS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2020

conjecture about this could act this way. … For example, the 2002 Farm Bill, which allowed non-citizen children to get SNAP without a waiting period or the 2010 Landmark Affordable Care Act, which greatly expanded access to Medicaid for working

Oral argument — David Unruh v. Rick Hall, Warden

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 6, 2014

Thus, to the extent Appellee rests on such comments to support its claim that no sentencing error was committed in this case, those comments should be disregarded. … First of all, any criminal who commits an act of attempted murder with the use of a gun or an assault commits an act of extreme violence frighteningly disproportionate...

Oral argument — Western Watersheds Project v. Amy Lueders

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 20, 2017

It's also the period when there's breeding and nesting going on. … The agency is supposed to get all sorts of public comment, and comment from the local government, and then it may change the project quite a bit based on these comments.

Oral argument — Kuykendall v. Schneidewind

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2016

And moreover, regarding that, that aspect, it's plaintiff's burden to the appellate, as the appellant here, to provide this Court with a record sufficiently complete to permit review of the air complaint … I appreciate your comment. Now, here the trial court did not err in dismissing the matter, correct, with prejudice as to all three defendants under 619.

Oral argument — SD Police Officers v. SDCERS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2008

Well, actually, the damages, the act of implementing it was one act. … So minimally, at the very least, you can go back through those two-year periods where they were actually making those payments, and that continued unlawful activity is there during that time period.

Oral argument — In re: Akhlaghpour

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 13, 2025

what we can do about it, a period during which Bankruptcy Council was appointed, you know, and was acting on behalf of a producer and was themselves a producer, as to which I think you're not going to … On remand, the Superior Court is directed to grant acting for leave to amend her complaint to state any claims based solely on Arante's conduct during the period she was a debtor out of possession and,

Oral argument — United States v. Okello Chatrie

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 30, 2025

I use opt-in and basically air quotes. Right. … I think, actually, because of the Stored Communications Act, probably not. The Stored Communications Act limits the scope of what the government can get pursuant to a subpoena.

Oral argument — Karin Kristensen v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2020

Each of these three incorrect legal rulings cause reversible air, which is reviewed under the de novo standard. The court should reverse and render. … Those are exceptions to the Federal Tort Claims Act. Once the court finds the Federal Tort Claims Act applies, then those are exceptions that would have to be proved.

Oral argument — Schroeder v. RGIS, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 30, 2013

Act. … What he's alleged here is that over a one-year period, he suffered gradual exhaustion.

Oral argument — United States v. Rollness

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2009

We have his comments, Mr. … For example, one part of that comment relates to the Walsh family. Mr. Fable was also charged in connection with the murder as one of the racketeering acts, as was Mr. Binder.

Oral argument — Thomas Smith v. PAM Transport Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 18, 2025

There's a new acting general counsel. Is that general counsel approved this briefing? … He used monkey, comma, like Davis, period. Then he goes on to say monkey ass, they used that. So that's two terms.

Oral argument — Oregon Trollers Assn. v. Gutierrez

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2006

The Magnuson Act establishes a fairly comprehensive process for the fishery councils to develop the regulations, lots of public comment, lots of public input, and then a very short window for judicial … If they act within 30 days of that time period, Congress says that's okay. But there's nothing in the statutory language that says they have to do it the first time it's applied to them.

Oral argument — Flying J, Inc. v. Thomas Pistacchio

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2009

There was no finding that Lawson was clean or that any of this other stuff was acceptable. And it's ‑‑ you know, I've read that decision over 50 times. … She acted appropriately and she acted well. And with 25 seconds left, if the Court has any further questions, I'll be happy to answer them. Thank you very much.

Oral argument — Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. United States Forest Service

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2024

And it just suddenly springs out of nowhere in the decision notice, even though my clients had been asking them to do this analysis since the comment period for the original draft EA. … NFMA does too, and it's part of the National Forest Management Act's requirement for integrated forest plants.

Oral argument — United States v. An

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 27, 2019

Anderson access to his clean clothing while the judge berated Mr. Anderson, he also pointed out that he thought that the marshal service did a darn good job. … I believe it was a warrant from the government to get this information under the – I can't remember the act off the top of my head. Board communication act? Thank you. Yes.

Oral argument — James v. C-Tran

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2005

For example, under their normal policy regarding customer comments, an employee could have up to eight customer comments of the same nature that were confirmed before the employee would be discharged. … Combs, again, a supervisor, commented outside the statute of limitations period. Mr. James admits in his deposition, never mentions race, never mentions you will lose your job for making complaints.

Oral argument — Bush v. Central Mortgage Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2016

Supreme Court acknowledged that and specifically commented on the fact that the common law concepts of rescission do not apply to TILA. … And just one more comment on that. In fact, the statute lays out certain circumstances for when the consumer doesn't have to tender back at all.

Oral argument — Medcalf v. Sonnen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2006

Do you want to comment on that? I do. I do. And I think there's two ways to comment on that. … Harris, requires that the defendant have acted in conscious disregard of known dangers. Willful recklessness is not deliberate indifference.