Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.97s
Oral argument — Genesis Marine v. Darrow
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2025
It's almost as if the court has gone from a de novo standard to a clear air standard or vice versa. It's that fundamental. The presumptions are different. The inferences are drawn in a different way. … But having asserted it on timing, we say now we look at the timing, period, end of story. That's kind of what we do in immigration cases. Why isn't that the arena here? It is.
40 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Jasmine Bradley
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 6, 2024
And my comment to you is how do you respond that this additional reasonable time deals with efforts to restore the defendant? She doesn't need restored here. It just doesn't seem like a fit. … The Insanity Defense Reform Act simply does not provide the sort of remedy that the defendant is asking for here.
20 min of audioOral argument — Karen Gertz v. Toyota Motor Corporation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 26, 2013
In product liability cases, California courts look at the difference between a manufacturing defect and a design defect and how you clean each. This is a contract case. … Act 4, 1453. Is that right? I believe that. Let me pull the case up. I have it down as page... I don't see a page 300 here. 1482. I apologize.
84 min of audioOral argument — California Insurance Company v. Ricardo Lara
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2021
And there was a concern that they could do it later and then try to clean up afterwards and it just wouldn't be enough. And so this is exactly where, you know, this is why 1011C is where it is. … There was for a wrongful act. The state actor is a party to the proceeding.
56 min of audioOral argument — Casey Hyland v. HomeServ of America
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 18, 2014
During the class period from 2001 to 2005, houses were going up. Dr. … average commissions declined over the class period from an average level of about 5.5% to slightly under 5% by the end of the class period.
34 min of audioOral argument — NCO Financial Systems, Inc. v. Montgomery Park, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2018
Haas was hired to act in Montgomery Park's best interest, not NCO's. Well, why would Montgomery Park have to hire a broker to act in NCO's interest? NCO could have hired its own broker. … A landlord has to act reasonably. It doesn't have to act and do everything that, after the fact, somebody can come in and say, well, you could have done this and you could have done that.
53 min of audioOral argument — Terrance Amons v. Dillon Tindle
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2021
In fact, at very early on, he puts his hands up in the air. Officer Arellano instructs him to put his hands on the steering wheel, which he does. … He's not acting erratically. Officers don't know anything about him. They don't even know if he's committed a crime.
31 min of audioOral argument — Lamps Plus v. Dolan
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 4, 2003
A few comments with regards to — with regards to attorney's fees. … We believe enough originality to meet the restrictions of the Copyright Act, and we've seen cases where there's far less originality that's passed muster.
34 min of audioOral argument — University of Pennsylvania v. Eli Lilly and Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2018
on radio sensitivity Radiation was known then and was still known to work preferentially on dividing cells But the Penn inventors found that when they inhibited tumor cell division using agents that act … In the blue brief, Penn argues that the PTAB aired relying on three references, Waterhouse, Gabbritt, and Guilford.
37 min of audioOral argument — Curtis K. Hall v. Nancy Berryhill
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2018
My name is Christy Tate on behalf of the Acting Commissioner. As an initial matter, Dr. Lucan was not the only principal treating doctor for Mr. Hall. Dr. … The ALJ commented that Dr. Lucan's opinion seems to be a product of sympathy. The ALJ also commented that Mr. Hall had been referred to Dr. Lucan by the internist.
18 min of audioOral argument — Roberto Cohen v. USDC-CASJ
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 1, 2009
If I buy 100 shares at the beginning of the class period at $100 a share and I sell at the end of the class period at $1 a share, I have a realized loss. … With respect to the comment about – I don't think I really have to belabor it – but with respect to the conference committee comment, if the Court looks at the Third Circuit's sentence decision, which
33 min of audioOral argument — Carucel Investments L.P. v. Vidal
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2023
We didn't pull that out of the air. There was a prior construction given by a district court. It did come up to this court. It was affirmed without a written opinion. … What was claimed was a movable base station that significantly improved wireless communications by acting as an intermediary between cell towers and mobile devices.
51 min of audioOral argument — NADARAJAH v. GONZALES
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2006
to impose that time period. … And it can't just be that putting the T word in the air and saying terrorism is enough to detain somebody for four and a half years. And if the Court doesn't have any further questions. Thank you.
52 min of audioOral argument — Bonnichsen v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2003
Judge Gelders made comments about the legislative history at the first court proceeding that happened in this case in approximately October of 1996 and commented on the record that he had read the legislative … We have also, in the answering brief on the tribes appeal, cited some comments that appear in the legislative record, and that is at page 31 of our brief, a couple of comments, and again, a very sparse
65 min of audioOral argument — Kevin Stanbridge v. Gregory Scott
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 22, 2015
Second, the comments by the prosecutor on closing argument were improper because they so infected the trial with unfairness so as to abridge Mr. … The first is through periodic reexamination by the doctors, and the second is through a petition for discharge or conditional release by Mr. Stanbridge.
16 min of audioOral argument — Bonnichsen v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2003
We have also, in the answering brief on the tribe's appeal, cited some comments that appear in the legislative record, and that is at page 31 of our brief, a couple of comments, and again, a very sparse … legislative history, but Representative Bennett in debates commented that we as a nation should take care of remains for which there are no modern descendants, and Senator Apaka commented that consideration
65 min of audioOral argument — United States v. An
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 27, 2019
Anderson access to his clean clothing while the judge berated Mr. Anderson, he also pointed out that he thought that the marshal service did a darn good job. … I believe it was a warrant from the government to get this information under the – I can't remember the act off the top of my head. Board communication act? Thank you. Yes.
54 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Jeffrey Beard, II
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2022
Clearly it's just a comment she referred to Mr. Beard saying, yeah, he says it's good too. Nothing to do with his influence, nothing to do with his making a decision, just a mere comment. … There's no evidence that he was selling drugs during that en banc period. He wouldn't have been able to, or he would have gone back to jail.
30 min of audioOral argument — Self v. B P X Operating
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2022
Similarly, the civil code and its articles say, its comments say, if you're not acting, if you are not acting to benefit the managed party and you're in fact acting in a way that benefits you uniquely, … Those courts are weighing prescriptive periods. Here's a conversion period of one year. Here's a 10-year period for your UMO.
41 min of audioOral argument — Ryan v. Fox Television Stations
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 25, 2012
Right, but here we have a government watchdog organization commenting on an elected official. All elected officials in this system, right? There's no question in it. … They continued to put teaser video on the TV showing him ducking out, here's another judge, and making comments, dirty little secret of the Cook County Justice. Mr.
53 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.