Documents

Oral argument — Hattie Tanner v. Joan Yukins

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2017

Watson, then goes upstairs and is cleaning things off but leaves one drop of blood. Well, if they cut themselves and bled on Ms. Watson and that DNA does not match Ms. … We appreciate, in particular, the appointment under the Criminal Justice Act for your representation of your client in the interest of justice. And this case will be submitted.

Oral argument — Kelvin Spencer v. Specialty Foundry Products Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2020

In fact, there's multiple instances of different acts, different products, different combinations of products over a 17-year period that wouldn't constitute one single focused event. … I think a lot of commentators and judges across the nation have, but not all of them.

Oral argument — Mid Continent Steel & Wire, Inc. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2025

And that's reflected in the agency's actions subsequent to recognize this court's decision to seek comment and to adopt a new methodology which we also support. And I would also comment on Mr. … What, if any, time limits are there on the CIT acting on the assumption we vacate the CIT, not the CIT, the Commerce acting on the assumption we vacate the CIT decision and order the CIT to remand it to

Oral argument — Bush v. Central Mortgage Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2016

Supreme Court acknowledged that and specifically commented on the fact that the common law concepts of rescission do not apply to TILA. … And just one more comment on that. In fact, the statute lays out certain circumstances for when the consumer doesn't have to tender back at all.

Oral argument — Natl. Assoc. of Regulatory v. FCC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2017

But right now, the air carrier... Sites very jealously are concerned about the use of numbers in the numbering system. … And I would assert there's not a good reason for such an interpretation, especially in a pro-competitive act like the 96 Act.

Oral argument — Donald Bosse v. Michael Chertoff

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2009

That's what triggers the time period. And within that time period, he goes to an EEO counselor. But what is it exactly that happened that you say triggers it? … Davidovich's comment that the 45-day period is triggered by the attempt to enforce the letter, not the letter itself, but the enforcement which occurred in December.

Oral argument — Janay Garrick v. Moody Bible Institute

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2023

Cohen is for clean questions separate from the merits that are pure questions of law. Because all of the stuff that we're talking about, this is district court litigation. … Just period. That's off the table.

Oral argument — United States v. Michael Rojas

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2020

Those counts would be subject to an enlarged statute of limitations because the acts occurred 10 years prior to the time of the indictment. … Michael Rojas suffered during the time period involved, which was an 11-month period between 2006 and 2007, which is when all of these 14 transactions occurred.

Oral argument — People v. Hayes

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 22, 2011

Hayes had been held for a lengthy period of time he ultimately did state that he had wrestled the knife free from her But this is this is evidence But there was also the evidence that that it had gone … moving on to the second issue a Prosecutor's comment does not amount to reversible error unless the defendant can so show that he was so substantially Prejudiced by that comment such that the comment

Oral argument — NWIRP v. USCIS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2020

Yes, there's notice and comment rulemaking ongoing, comment period ended in November. I can't predict what's going to happen moving forward, but that's where things stand. … That is, some of the directions to act within a certain period of times can be a claims processing rule that can be relaxed.

Oral argument — Ward v. J.J.B. Hilliard

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 18, 2018

Finally, the talk were aired in not giving due regard to Federal and State policy which favors arbitration as required by the U.S. Supreme Court in Mastro Buono I hope I've got that right v. … As noted by the committee comments to the rule, the purpose of a dispositive motion under 361 is to eliminate the burden of the parties by forcing them unnecessarily to brief and argue the merits of the

Oral argument — Ross v. Gilhuly

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 10, 2014

So your position is that the lack of a statement by the supervisor outside of the PIP, in the establishment of the PIP, that that negative comment, the absence of any negative comment is itself evidence … Ross and others at Continental regarding what Ross was doing and what he was supposed to be doing and what he was failing to do throughout that entire period.

Oral argument — NADARAJAH v. GONZALES

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2006

to impose that time period. … And it can't just be that putting the T word in the air and saying terrorism is enough to detain somebody for four and a half years. And if the Court doesn't have any further questions. Thank you.

Oral argument — Empire Today v. Luna Carpet & Blinds Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2010

And if so, how do you measure the reasonableness of the time period? I'll answer. … Simply to keep an experienced salesman off the road so that he's immobilized for a period of time?

Oral argument — Firefighters' Retirement Sys v. Citco Group

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 27, 2015

It's just the kind of legal error that ThermTron makes clear this court has the legal authority to review when the court acts beyond its statute. … And so, assuming that you don't get, you know, box number one, that A, we have jurisdiction, and B, here's a nice, clean ruling, you can go back to New York.

Oral argument — Wadsworth v. Nguyen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2024

No, not with the school resource officer, but about the wife's comment. That was in the same conversation. That was Ms. Philbrook relaying that comment to Mr. Spear. … Wynn didn't rise to the level of an affirmative act.

Oral argument — Oscar Insurance Company of Fl. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 20, 2020

I hope the background – my neighbor has chosen to have his lawn cleaned today. I hope that doesn't get in the way. I apologize. … I'm going to get to coercion as quickly as I can in light of Judge Brasher's comment that my friend, Mr. Waxman, was well advised to start there.

Oral argument — Shasteen v. Shelby Memorial Hospital

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 14, 2010

That provision was eliminated as a result of the Tort Reform Act and the Best v. Taylor machine. … It was in the hands of everyone within the 90-day period of time.

Oral argument — United States v. Pabon, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2015

She had a concern to protect the kids out there, and she said she commented on his anger issues. She never commented on his sexual impulse issues, on whether he needed sexual offender treatment. … It's re-offending, period.

Oral argument — Stucke v. City of Philadelphia

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 18, 2016

And there's nothing before that in the time period of when Mr. Stuckey still had the job of acting assistant director. … Brooks was in the position of acting assistant director for three years. So this could have lasted, as far as he knew, for an indefinite period of time. And Mr.