Documents

Oral argument — Goetz v. The City of Springfield

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 13, 2013

Finally, the City is governed by the Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act, and under the rules interpreting that act by the Department of Labor, an employer cannot enforce a use it or lose it policy … I'm trying to be careful to limit my comments to what's on the record rather than what my experience was, but if one takes a look at the agreement and it's fairly carefully carved out about what the rules

Oral argument — Best Key Textiles Co. Ltd. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2014

There's an open comment period, and it gathered information during that open comment period, but it also has to construe the tariff. Other agencies don't do that. They don't do that. … They get comments. It's all on the public record. Everybody can comment on it. Well, Your Honor, this was public record. There was a 1625c notice and comment period.

Oral argument — Alaska Wildlife Alliance v. USFWS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2024

The Marine Mammal Protection Act doesn't just prohibit killing, but harming and even harassing marine mammals, unless several narrow exceptions are met. … , pages 148 to 49 in response to comment 83, and page 154 in response to comment 129.

Oral argument — Pacific Radiation Oncology, LLC v. The Queen's Medical Center

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 15, 2012

However, the summary judgment record establishes as a matter of law that the board acted on a basis of mixed motives. … Under the Sherman Act, for example? Yeah.

Oral argument — Longv.Atl City Pol

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 10, 2011

I represent the appellants Cyclechem and Clean Venture Inc. I would like to begin by addressing the court's letter of November 3rd. … I understand that 4A4 is a product of the Rules Enabling Act and the committee's actions, unlike 4A1 and other parts of Rule 4.

Oral argument — United States v. Arterbury

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2019

Just because Workman found that the District Court of Colorado aired an application of the law, that's not a change in the law. … So in my view, he's conceding that, under that analysis of the fundamental fairness, the government acted appropriately. So I'd ask you to affirm the district court. We have some time.

Oral argument — EEOC v. Roark-Whitten Hospitality

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 20, 2021

I'll start with addressing one, the first comment, actually, of counsel for EEOC, correctly saying that this is an equitable doctrine. … We have right now, I think, a number that's basically pulled out of thin air. I don't understand that there is no EEOC presentation as to damages that make sense at any other number. None.

Oral argument — United States v. Dionandre Ganter

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2021

Counsel said, well, he conceded that the that the that the Bannerman made comments that raised the cause issue, but he said I still have to object. Right. Yes. That's that's correct. … Dancer was trying to do here in the in the magistrate judge didn't didn't air or plainly or otherwise in refusing to let him do that.

Oral argument — Myra Corley v. Long-Lewis, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 12, 2020

I don't know that I can comment on that. Okay. Forgive me. Let's . . . But . . . Well, in any event, let me move on to the second jurisdictional question. … Under the Jones Act, there's concurrent state and federal jurisdiction.

Oral argument — Henry Hill v. Craig Whitford

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 28, 2021

And when you put that into the circumstance of the sewer reconstruction work that was going on in the whole area at the time, odor of sewage in the air probably wasn't that unusual while that work was … First of all, this is a number of tenants who are in this building, and what we have here is two sentences Judge Guy's comment made. It's ambiguously worded.

Oral argument — King v. DVA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2006

Well, Your Honor, I believe what occurred here is that for this claim, it was remanded to the board after that act was passed. … I see. that he had been administered some drugs during his service, his honorable service with the United States Air Force, that destroyed his body. He was way off point, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Barbara Bowden v. Forest River, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 26, 2022

The plaintiffs brought this claim under the Magnuson Moss Warranty Act in addition to state-related claims involving deceptive trade practices. … Bennett was longer representing the plaintiffs making the claim for the attorney's fees, and somebody put an extra not in there, and I don't know why they didn't clean it up, and you all of the...

Oral argument — Ralph Janvey v. Peter Romero

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2017

He's the court-appointed receiver charged with cleaning up the very large Stanford Ponzi scheme. … And what was the comments about that in the record? In the record about? It was weighed. How was it weighed? Well, it was weighed because the court determined that the appellant wouldn't settle.

Oral argument — Beardslee v. Woodford

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 15, 2004

Beardsley acted with cold, uncalculated motive to kill witnesses. That was the prosecution's case in this case. … And I think I have to pause here for a moment to comment on one of the points that Mr. Lawrence made about the mitigating case.

Oral argument — Planned Parenthood v. Gonzales

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2005

Katz's argument as well, is there really is not a clean distinction between D&E, where the fetus ends up being disarticulated in the process, and D&E, where the fetus is removed intact. … In addition, the holding – Let me – let me – this is – I'm following on with your – from your comments and from Judge Thomas's question. Is there a relevant difference here?

Oral argument — Bradley Waterman v. IRS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2022

Period. In the new regime, they'll say there's an allegation against you and. … And he is able to comment and only thereafter do they close his case.

Oral argument — American Great Lakes Ports As v. Karl Schultz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 22, 2020

The credit would simply work invoices for the 2016 period By the way, that period was attenuated It ran all the way into the fall of 2017 Any invoices during the time when the 2016 rate was in effect should … agency not to have acted appropriately in the ordinary course.

Oral argument — United States v. Oscar Marquez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2022

On the Speedy Trial Act, I think what I'd like to do in the remaining time is just to point out that the simplest path here to a finding of a violation is that last period of time that is disputed between … and the excludable time ruling when a period of time is indirectly attributed to the Court's calendar, that itself is not a problem under the Speedy Trial Act.

Oral argument — HRSA-ILA Funds v. Adidas AG

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2025

Here, the conduct from 2013 to 2018 did not cause harm, and in fact, in that period, there are allegations that Mr. … And there's no allegation that in any way harm to Adidas was imminent during that whole four-year period.

Oral argument — Capitol Specialty Insurance Corporation v. Steadfast Insurance Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2025

into the policy period as required. … There is a very generic comment in the file that I think counsel is referring to. It doesn't even name Military Road.