Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Tikotin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2008

One last comment. I know Mr. … But we're saying they're constrained by a Federal act. Federal Code of Civil Procedure 69 says that if there is no statute, no Federal statute, State court procedure must be followed.

Oral argument — Soul'd Out Productions, LLC v. Anschutz Entertainment Group

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2020

First, artists who perform at Coachella may not perform at any other festival in all of North America for a period of about six months. … That becomes a wrongful act.

Oral argument — People v. Hill

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 13, 2018

Well, I think you have to look at an ineffective assistance claim not just on a particular act. … And that if you look at it in hindsight, then some act or omission by defense counsel can seem to be error.

Oral argument — United States v. Terry Smith

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 6, 2016

I'm sorry, the prosecutor made that comment with respect to counts one and four as well, right? Sure. … Land do anything at all, and suddenly he's up in the air, and then he's on the ground, and then, you know, other things happen. Anyway.

Oral argument — Peter Littlefair v. Arne Gonser

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 30, 2010

He was acting based upon the observations he made at the time. The Franks decision has been recognized and affirmed by the Supreme Court subsequently and also by this Court. … Had he done any overflight surveillance since that 1995 period? Not of the Little Fair property. Not of the Little Fair, okay.

Oral argument — Marriage of Miller

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 18, 2024

He kept an air compressor. He also shared certain family traditions and special moments with Tammy and her children. It comes up a number of times in the record. … And again, we also have his mother staying there for a period of approximately three months, an entire summer, going on a trip with the two of them and Tammy's daughter.

Oral argument — Brent Cherne v. U.S. Internal Revenue Service

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2017

Cherney was responsible and willful the whole time, throughout the whole period. … You're leaving me up in the air. What's your position as to the mootness? Is this case moot because of the finding by the trustee that there's no assets in this particular bankrupt estate?

Oral argument — Naperville Smart Meter Awarene v. City of Naperville

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 27, 2018

Somehow or another, there needs to be monitoring of electric use over whatever the billing period is, let's call it a month. … If they had an air conditioner, for example, you could see the compressor was running.

Oral argument — Hites v. Waubonsee Community College

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2018

Your Honor, I think the position is that there is a 3G exemption under the Act, and that this was an appropriate situation in which to invoke that exemption. And so they have that opportunity. … It's a little misleading to say a week and leave it hanging in the air. I would think they'd be sitting in front of their computers. If I heard that answer.

Oral argument — Teresa Wagner v. Carolyn Jones

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 13, 2014

So there's this two-minute time period. The polling, really, it isn't inquiring into the jury's intent here. They were polled properly on, is your note accurate? … That's reviewed under the plain air standard.

Oral argument — Didon v. Castillo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 23, 2016

Isn't that clear air to have found that, that there are no differences in light of those differences that I just pointed out? … And because the district court did something it could not do in that instance, it acted without subject matter jurisdiction.

Oral argument — People v. Yarber

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 18, 2021

And so her closing argument went over the line of simply commenting on the evidence to attack one witness while vouching for the other. And again, we have no objection to this. … But then we learn on cross-examination that there's a two-month period when she's not in the Yarbrough home, so there's no sexual conduct.

Oral argument — United States v. Ef

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 23, 2020

while the wording is obviously less than ideal, I think it appears that what the Court meant to communicate to the defense is that there would be no further continuances, not that somehow by making a comment … I think we would agree that the arraignment could be the period considered.

Oral argument — In Re Vitamin C Antitrust Litigation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 17, 2021

If you want to comment after his answer, perhaps you can help me. Mr. … If it was compelled, it doesn't violate the Sherman Act. This is their entire defense in the case. Where it violates the Sherman Act is where they act outside of the compulsion.

Oral argument — T&E Pastorino Nursery v. Duke Energy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2004

So, as I should say, you're on the air. Thank you. I'd like to reserve for myself about seven minutes at the end of my argument. … Let me make one other quick comment on a decision of this Court that is discussed in the reply brief of the appellants, and that is Lockyer v.

Oral argument — Ashley Gerstner v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2017

or going for her other treatment during that same time period. … I just wanted to point out that the appellant talked about looking for work, the ALJ's comment on looking for work, and the ALJ's comment about doctors saying increase your activity.

Oral argument — Bittendorf v. DeKalb County Collector

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2017

The Property Tax Code and its predecessor, the Illinois Revenue Act, have been in existence since before the Civil War. … What's the time period, the relevant time period? Pays when? Gets the refund from the taxing body when? The time period works like this. Upon demand, the collector shall pay.

Oral argument — United States v. Juan Morales-Isabarras

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2013

They have to act on the warrant. They didn't act on it. They offered no reason to explain why it was necessary to actually fail to bring him up here to this district to face the charges. … And I believe that is – was also the Court's holding in Garrett, that the focus is on the necessity for the court to act, not whether or not it was necessary for a party to act.

Oral argument — Karen Gertz v. Toyota Motor Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 26, 2013

In product liability cases, California courts look at the difference between a manufacturing defect and a design defect and how you clean each. This is a contract case. … Act 4, 1453. Is that right? I believe that. Let me pull the case up. I have it down as page... I don't see a page 300 here. 1482. I apologize.

Oral argument — Castillo v. Castro

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2004

And I believe that the court misinterpreted that Supreme Court decision and thought that it could not consider any acts which predated the 300-day limitation period. … within a time period.