Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.53s
Oral argument — Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Higgins
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2025
period specific written comments. … If we disagree with you and conclude that waiver doesn't apply here and that Alliance can raise this argument even though it didn't raise it in the comment period, where does that leave the rest of this
45 min of audioOral argument — People v. Mitchell
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 25, 2018
Separated into two time periods, right? Correct. Okay. … Also, I wanted to mention that the, sorry, it's not as if this video contained one inadmissible comment. This video contained many, many, many, many inadmissible comments.
31 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Ray
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2025
So that was a very clean and simple case. Your Honor, I actually have two important points in response to that. First, I don't think the plea agreement's relevant at all here. … Well- And therefore, it would be unfair to allow the government, without giving you an opportunity to respond, to rely on the victim impact statement, absent some opportunity of both parties to comment
38 min of audioOral argument — Hattie Tanner v. Joan Yukins
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2017
Watson, then goes upstairs and is cleaning things off but leaves one drop of blood. Well, if they cut themselves and bled on Ms. Watson and that DNA does not match Ms. … We appreciate, in particular, the appointment under the Criminal Justice Act for your representation of your client in the interest of justice. And this case will be submitted.
43 min of audioOral argument — Azurity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Edge Pharma, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2022
This is under the Lanham Act, and as the Supreme Court said in the Palm Wonderful case, you have the Lanham Act and the Food and Drug Cosmetic Act, and they are equal federal acts. … And that is where that comment is, JA95. And that comment is not limited by the idea that it has to be at least on the nominated list?
40 min of audioOral argument — Global Tubing LLC v. Tenaris Coiled Tubes LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2025
But the comment doesn't seem related to that at all. And, I mean, we all know how we edit documents sometimes and make comments. … And Judge Hughes, I understand that the comment bubble, you know, is, I understand your questions about the comment bubble.
65 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Verne Merrell
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2022
It's wiped clean, as you see in Pepperin and Pete. That means the ‑‑ Is it right? There was so much of the sentence that wasn't affected. That wasn't affected, you said? … I have a couple more comments regarding the First Step Act. Mr. Vovos has indicated to me that he wanted to give the rest of his rebuttal time to me as well.
56 min of audioOral argument — Charatz v. Avaya
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009
McGuire after the class period. … And the discounts went up as the class period went on to 30-40%. And what does Mr. McGuire say after the class period? Oh yeah, I heard that noise in the first quarter.
48 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2016
It's under the Clean Water Act, correct? So why would that go beyond just the water? Sure. So the Army court has to make a decision about whether or not to grant a permit at Lake Oahe. … We're not talking about all the various Clean Water Act crossings that go the whole length of the pipeline.
104 min of audioOral argument — In re Marriage of Sorce
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 21, 2015
Velassi, the court's comment about this being a legal note, that was one of the claims of dissipation. … This case does not arise under the Act. It's merely a third party case that has nothing to do with the Dissolution Act.
49 min of audioOral argument — Gina Latture v. Priority Life Care, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2025
So we believe the district court erred in concluding that these comments were not severe or pervasive. These are comments that were made over a period of six months. … Particularly when you're dealing with a very short period of time, you have these comments essentially on a day-to-day basis, where the supervisor is making disparaging comments about African Americans
35 min of audioOral argument — Kelvin Spencer v. Specialty Foundry Products Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2020
In fact, there's multiple instances of different acts, different products, different combinations of products over a 17-year period that wouldn't constitute one single focused event. … I think a lot of commentators and judges across the nation have, but not all of them.
43 min of audioOral argument — Mid Continent Steel & Wire, Inc. v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2025
And that's reflected in the agency's actions subsequent to recognize this court's decision to seek comment and to adopt a new methodology which we also support. And I would also comment on Mr. … What, if any, time limits are there on the CIT acting on the assumption we vacate the CIT, not the CIT, the Commerce acting on the assumption we vacate the CIT decision and order the CIT to remand it to
26 min of audioOral argument — Carlson v. DVA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2007
Not necessarily administered by the Department of the Army or the Department of the Air Force or whatever the Service is. … The first sentence says, in line of duty means an injury or disease incurred or aggravated during a period of active military service.
37 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Penn
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 12, 2015
And, you know, not only that, like I said, she found the guns, the ammunition, the holster in the Air Jordan backpack. … This court has affirmed the admission of similar acts of conduct where the government has made a proper articulation. I believe the Lopez decision is one such case, and maybe Gavon was another one.
32 min of audioOral argument — FORRESTER ENVIR v. WHEELABRATOR
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 2, 2013
There are four state law causes of action, one for Consumer Protection Act violation, two for intentional interference, and one for misappropriation. None of them raise a patent law issue. … Plainly, there are classes of cases where state law claims are articulated that have some patent issue, I think, to use a phrase this Court has used, in the air, that don't necessarily require resolution
38 min of audioOral argument — In re Seizure of 2006 Harley Davidson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 18, 2017
These are two completely separate acts. People versus Daly, which is what the defendant primarily relies upon. … Especially, again, we can't create out of thin air that this conflict started when she was simultaneously representing both of these clients. This guy was not a witness until February of 2014.
34 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Bruce Humphrey
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 17, 2014
So you're saying it was air for the judge at the hearing before the weekend not to continue the trial until weeks or months later. That's the argument? Right. I understand the argument. … Bonnet, you have served again under the Criminal Justice Act, and once again the court appreciates you.
32 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Jan 19, 2010
We showed that as well at the trial court, aired, and I don't know if Randy knows. We may have time in reply. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Clark. Thank you. Mr. Anditch, you may respond. Thank you. … And the uncontested evidence showed that QCNA financially thrived and continued to grow throughout the time period that MNG was in existence.
37 min of audioOral argument — Bush v. Central Mortgage Co.
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2016
Supreme Court acknowledged that and specifically commented on the fact that the common law concepts of rescission do not apply to TILA. … And just one more comment on that. In fact, the statute lays out certain circumstances for when the consumer doesn't have to tender back at all.
46 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.