Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Curtis Cluff

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 5, 2017

The judge was sitting there when he made his comments that were cut off. He sat there during the arraignment that Judge Juneau referenced, et cetera. … And the determination by the district court that it was, is entitled to deference and if it's reviewed under clear air. I'd like to go back to record page 179, where Mr.

Oral argument — Firefighters' Retirement Sys v. Citco Group

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 27, 2015

It's just the kind of legal error that ThermTron makes clear this court has the legal authority to review when the court acts beyond its statute. … And so, assuming that you don't get, you know, box number one, that A, we have jurisdiction, and B, here's a nice, clean ruling, you can go back to New York.

Oral argument — Islam v. Atty Gen USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2025

It enumerates specific acts, and we argue that sexual contact is not something that is among those acts. It's merely an embedded definition. … But the Supreme Court was pretty clear that courts are not riding on a clean slate.

Oral argument — United States v. Rollness

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2009

We have his comments, Mr. … For example, one part of that comment relates to the Walsh family. Mr. Fable was also charged in connection with the murder as one of the racketeering acts, as was Mr. Binder.

Oral argument — Davi v. Roberts

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2026

In other words, he acted because of the words. He was acting because of what was said. What makes it unlawful retaliation? What makes it intent to protect the public, et cetera? … Dahvie's comments, why would they do such a thing? What evidence is there that they didn't act in good faith?

Oral argument — Azurity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Edge Pharma, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2022

This is under the Lanham Act, and as the Supreme Court said in the Palm Wonderful case, you have the Lanham Act and the Food and Drug Cosmetic Act, and they are equal federal acts. … And that is where that comment is, JA95. And that comment is not limited by the idea that it has to be at least on the nominated list?

Oral argument — Marriage of Miller

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 18, 2024

He kept an air compressor. He also shared certain family traditions and special moments with Tammy and her children. It comes up a number of times in the record. … And again, we also have his mother staying there for a period of approximately three months, an entire summer, going on a trip with the two of them and Tammy's daughter.

Oral argument — Hites v. Waubonsee Community College

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2018

Your Honor, I think the position is that there is a 3G exemption under the Act, and that this was an appropriate situation in which to invoke that exemption. And so they have that opportunity. … It's a little misleading to say a week and leave it hanging in the air. I would think they'd be sitting in front of their computers. If I heard that answer.

Oral argument — Brent Cherne v. U.S. Internal Revenue Service

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2017

Cherney was responsible and willful the whole time, throughout the whole period. … You're leaving me up in the air. What's your position as to the mootness? Is this case moot because of the finding by the trustee that there's no assets in this particular bankrupt estate?

Oral argument — Naperville Smart Meter Awarene v. City of Naperville

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 27, 2018

Somehow or another, there needs to be monitoring of electric use over whatever the billing period is, let's call it a month. … If they had an air conditioner, for example, you could see the compressor was running.

Oral argument — Peter Littlefair v. Arne Gonser

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 30, 2010

He was acting based upon the observations he made at the time. The Franks decision has been recognized and affirmed by the Supreme Court subsequently and also by this Court. … Had he done any overflight surveillance since that 1995 period? Not of the Little Fair property. Not of the Little Fair, okay.

Oral argument — Didon v. Castillo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 23, 2016

Isn't that clear air to have found that, that there are no differences in light of those differences that I just pointed out? … And because the district court did something it could not do in that instance, it acted without subject matter jurisdiction.

Oral argument — Teresa Wagner v. Carolyn Jones

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 13, 2014

So there's this two-minute time period. The polling, really, it isn't inquiring into the jury's intent here. They were polled properly on, is your note accurate? … That's reviewed under the plain air standard.

Oral argument — Calvin Barton v. House of Raeford Farms, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2013

That's what the South Carolina Wage Payment Act says. And the South Carolina Wage Payment Act does not create any independent rights. … As soon as you get an interpretation of the collective bargaining agreement, the Act preempts the South Carolina Wage Payment Act.

Oral argument — Garcia v. Brockway

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2007

And in compliance with the Fair Housing Act. Well, he interpreted it to be that. But is that what Boise certificate of occupancy was communicating? … And so these cases that have looked at whether the continuing violation theory should even apply here look at whether there was some ongoing act or act or practice within this, you know, the time period

Oral argument — United States v. Brian Johnson

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2026

We've been focused on commercial sex act, which is defined as any sex act on account of which anything of value is given to or received by any person. So what's the limiting principle of that? … The district court did air when it overturned the jury's finding as to the child pornography counts.

Oral argument — Hernandez v. The Office of the Commissioner

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2023

It was that it was never hired, period. … But since you called that comment out for Mr. Marsh, I wanted to alert you to similar type of comments in other umpires' evaluations. That's interesting. Thank you. Thank you very much, Mr. Gregg.

Oral argument — United States v. Daniel Stanford

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2017

The comments that she made about him were before he was convicted, before the jury verdict. Okay, just in two sentences. … You can just put a period behind that one. Okay. Can I ask one question? Yeah, because I'm... Yeah, well, let me do this first.

Oral argument — People v. Snow

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2011

Pitzel, made comments about how he performed, how he handled cross-examination and the like. And it seems to me that if the trial court got into that much detail, that was reviewed by this court. … And the fact that during the same time period as this trial counsel was, by his own admission at his own sentencing hearing, drinking every day and not working on cases outside of court.

Oral argument — Falls v. Silver Cross Hospital & Medical Centers

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2016

They were trying to clean up their act. Okay, let's assume there's not a tort action out there with the fund of money. Okay, there's no third-party tort user out there. … The proper avenue to then take care of that is to adjudicate the lien claim under Section 30 of the Health Care Services Lien Act.