Documents

Oral argument — In Re Yellow Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 25, 2025

These regulations had notice and comment that they did not... They did. … Well, I think we can rely upon the comments that were made and addressed by the agency.

Oral argument — NSK LTD v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2007

Is that an official position of Commerce that it can't act retroactively unless it acts under Section 129? … Well, it is Commerce's position that when it is implementing an adverse WTO report, it has to- Commerce's position is that it would be acting unlawfully if it didn't act under 129.

Oral argument — DNC v. Katie Hobbs

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 27, 2019

And with respect to responsiveness to the needs of the minority communities, the district court found that the evidence was insufficient and it essentially pointed to the Arizona Citizens Clean Elections … I don't think so, Your Honor, because in that hypothetical, the burden on the voter is having to go and, you know, vote within this 30-minute period.

Oral argument — United States v. Tikotin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2008

One last comment. I know Mr. … But we're saying they're constrained by a Federal act. Federal Code of Civil Procedure 69 says that if there is no statute, no Federal statute, State court procedure must be followed.

Oral argument — Thomas Lissick v. Andersen Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2020

Lissick should go forward relating specifically to the whistleblower act, the FMLA act and the sexual retaliation act. … That explains his comment, Lissick's comment. It explains why Mr. Hartwick saw a red light. It explains why Ms.

Oral argument — Wanda Johnson v. Johannes Mehserle

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2012

On several other occasions within a very short period of time, within several days, he made the same statements to other police officers. … Grant's left hand was up in the air, his left shoulder was up off the ground because he was starting to roll onto his right shoulder when the shot went off.

Oral argument — Keo Ratha v. Rubicon Resources, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 24, 2025

So I actually looked up the dates of every clarifying case that was cited to you and the dates that Congress acted, and this case is the shortest time period but one. … Reach over assistance was clean, obviously wasn't dealing with attempts merely to benefit. In fact, Justice Souter said there was harboring the victim and receipt of a benefit.

Oral argument — Termine v. Hart School District

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2003

I'm looking at page 2 to 3, where he's commenting that he doubts your appeal here will be successful. And then he says he didn't reach the issue of Section 56325A. … But which period is not covered under any theory right at the moment that you're fighting about? Which period is not? Which time period is not being reimbursed? Not in dispute.

Oral argument — Roy West v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2026

In fact, in analyzing the fourth prong of plain error review, the Supreme Court commented that it would, the real injustice would be to allow the defendants to be sentenced as if they were not distributing … Plain air. What did I say? Plain view. Oh, I'm sorry. I get all my search and seizure and all this other stuff all seems to come together at the same time.

Oral argument — Selina Ramirez v. City of Arlington, Texas

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2020

But that's not how they acted. And it's not what they said at the time, in response to investigators and in their written statements. … I mean, I would very much disagree that we're Monday morning quarterback, because the officers were because the way the officers acted, they acted as if they were a safe distance from Mr. Olivas.

Oral argument — Southwest Fair Housing Council v. MDWID

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2021

So what we're asking the court to decide is what is required to prove a disparate impact claim under the Fair Housing Act. … The district court said we were unable to show a disparate impact, period. That was the end. So the scope of review is de novo. Okay.

Oral argument — OFI Asset Management v. Cooper Tireand Rubber

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 1, 2016

You know, the plaintiffs act like it doesn't matter whether the thing that they should, that they say should have been said even was true or not. … That's something that was, uh, uh, up in the air. You had, you had problems and they were ongoing problems, but, uh, they thought we can get it done. We can get it done.

Oral argument — Global Tubing LLC v. Tenaris Coiled Tubes LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2025

But the comment doesn't seem related to that at all. And, I mean, we all know how we edit documents sometimes and make comments. … And Judge Hughes, I understand that the comment bubble, you know, is, I understand your questions about the comment bubble.

Oral argument — Schroeder v. RGIS, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 30, 2013

Act. … What he's alleged here is that over a one-year period, he suffered gradual exhaustion.

Oral argument — Ashley Gerstner v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2017

or going for her other treatment during that same time period. … I just wanted to point out that the appellant talked about looking for work, the ALJ's comment on looking for work, and the ALJ's comment about doctors saying increase your activity.

Oral argument — Jose Obando-Segura v. William Barr

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2020

And so, I mean, the problem I'm getting with is, you know, if we're on a clean slate, you have an argument. … And certainly there's some commentators that have said that, but do you agree with that?

Oral argument — Applications in Internet Time v. RPX Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2018

And that if you just look at those facts alone, along with the public statements made by RPX about, you know, acting on behalf of its members and acting as an extension of the in-house legal department … There were comments asking the PTO to establish a regulation or a rule defining what those terms mean, and the PTO did not do so. Instead, it just created a guide, right?

Oral argument — Smith v. Green

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2003

My expert said it was his opinion that the officer was standing at my client's feet and pointed the gun at him as he lay on the ground with his hands in the air and fired bullets into him. … Number two, there is no foundation at all for this one just thrown-out comment that he believes that the injuries were made while he was on the ground. There's just nothing to support that.

Oral argument — Viacom Outdoor v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 22, 2013

Honors, we believe that the circuit court erred in reversing the initial commission decision, which had sustained an arbitration decision, which had found that Section 11 of the Workers' Compensation Act … It was like – it was like similar to when I was in the Air Force and my flight commander came down and said, hey, Lieutenant Coghlan, we need somebody to work the snack bar this afternoon.

Oral argument — United States v. William Kozerski

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 29, 2020

But the 2 victims in this case, the VA set-aside program, absent another act of Congress, that $11.8 million is completely gone and it was not provided to the service disabled veterans as Congress intended … We're here on plein air review on 3F5 at any rate. We think that this court really need not reach that issue because 3F2 clearly applies, and there should be no offset.