Documents

Oral argument — Sherman Nealy v. Warner Chappell Music, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 19, 2023

They refer to damages, look back period of three years before filing suit. It says that 11 times, that there's a look back period of three years before filing suit. … It was construing the Copyright Act statute of limitations.

Oral argument — Bradley Waterman v. IRS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2022

Period. In the new regime, they'll say there's an allegation against you and. … And he is able to comment and only thereafter do they close his case.

Oral argument — Heppard v. Moore

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2003

Why didn't he say, I move for an extension of this time period because I only got this information yesterday? … Well, it's improper for jurors to make any comments of any sort, like even that kind of comment.

Oral argument — People v. Martin

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2018

We have the air conditioning on. Stay right here. Exactly, and I want to hear you, sir. Thank you, your Honor. Well, Mr. … If defendant, that's what the Post-Conviction Hearing Act is for.

Oral argument — United States v. Matthaios Fafalios

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2015

Instead, you have to look to the implementing regulations of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships. The Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships is the U.S. codification of our version of the treaty. … This sends a signal that something out there floating in the air may be a crime.

Oral argument — Varughese v. Mount Sinai Medic

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 29, 2017

So I based that on the conversations or the comments that were made directed at me by my supervisors. What particular comments? I'm aware of some that Dr. … He targeted me multiple times, at least three or four times over a course of a period of a year. And he was not subjected to any sort of negative treatment. No – Yes.

Oral argument — BETTCHER INDUSTRIES v. BUNZL USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2011

We are wrestled on the air. All right. Well, we'll see. Maybe he lost. We'll find out as the argument progresses. All right, very well. Why don't you go ahead. May it please the court. … I think that there is a final determination when the Patent Office acts and issues a right to appeal notice. This is simply saying that at the time, I'm sorry, before it goes to the BPAI. Yes. Right.

Oral argument — Vogel v. Boris

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2024

What are all the acts that happened before, say, February of 2015, or 20, before the combination? … Well, that doesn't appear on the thin air. Right. I'm interested that we're now sort of delving behind.

Oral argument — United States v. Ira Alan Arias

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2019

My question really was about the other prior sexual act evidence that came in. … Addressing harmless air, the only evidence of the assault is the testimony of the victim.

Oral argument — Kaskaskia Land Co. v. The Vandalia Levee and Drainage District

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 28, 2019

This is a provision of our Constitution that no legislative act and no decision of any court of this state can nullify. … You know, you have real property, you have easement, you have air rights. Easement is a property, and the case law is clear in Illinois.

Oral argument — Ky Karnecki v. City of Sisters

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2019

They don't have any rights to determine or preclude whether there was a discriminatory act. … That was all aired in the justice court, to my knowledge. So there are two primary things here.

Oral argument — Emmanuel Louis, Jr. v. Bluegreen Vacations Unlimited, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2023

So Congress acted, and it used strong medicine. … Whereas here, an agency's announcement of its interpretation is preceded by a very lengthy period of conspicuous inaction, the potential for unfair surprise is acute.

Oral argument — Russo v. New Hampshire Neurospine Institute, P.A.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2026

So we know that the comments they're claiming they relied on occurred after the decision to terminate. … But why does that tell us who's on the other side acting in a way that he finds disrespectful? It could have been a man. He could make the exact same comment.

Oral argument — Bonnichsen v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2003

We have also, in the answering brief on the tribe's appeal, cited some comments that appear in the legislative record, and that is at page 31 of our brief, a couple of comments, and again, a very sparse … legislative history, but Representative Bennett in debates commented that we as a nation should take care of remains for which there are no modern descendants, and Senator Apaka commented that consideration

Oral argument — Dahal v. Alla

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 19, 2010

We showed that as well at the trial court, aired, and I don't know if Randy knows. We may have time in reply. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Clark. Thank you. Mr. Anditch, you may respond. Thank you. … And the uncontested evidence showed that QCNA financially thrived and continued to grow throughout the time period that MNG was in existence.

Oral argument — In re Seizure of 2006 Harley Davidson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 18, 2017

These are two completely separate acts. People versus Daly, which is what the defendant primarily relies upon. … Especially, again, we can't create out of thin air that this conflict started when she was simultaneously representing both of these clients. This guy was not a witness until February of 2014.

Oral argument — Carlson v. DVA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2007

Not necessarily administered by the Department of the Army or the Department of the Air Force or whatever the Service is. … The first sentence says, in line of duty means an injury or disease incurred or aggravated during a period of active military service.

Oral argument — United States v. Penn

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 12, 2015

And, you know, not only that, like I said, she found the guns, the ammunition, the holster in the Air Jordan backpack. … This court has affirmed the admission of similar acts of conduct where the government has made a proper articulation. I believe the Lopez decision is one such case, and maybe Gavon was another one.

Oral argument — United States v. Bruce Humphrey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 17, 2014

So you're saying it was air for the judge at the hearing before the weekend not to continue the trial until weeks or months later. That's the argument? Right. I understand the argument. … Bonnet, you have served again under the Criminal Justice Act, and once again the court appreciates you.

Oral argument — FORRESTER ENVIR v. WHEELABRATOR

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 2, 2013

There are four state law causes of action, one for Consumer Protection Act violation, two for intentional interference, and one for misappropriation. None of them raise a patent law issue. … Plainly, there are classes of cases where state law claims are articulated that have some patent issue, I think, to use a phrase this Court has used, in the air, that don't necessarily require resolution