Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.42s
Oral argument — N. C. State Conference v. Patrick McCrory
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 21, 2016
What are your comments on that? … I mean, that is a relevant point, but it also goes to the knowledge with which the legislature was acting.
88 min of audioOral argument — Fulfillment Services v. UPS
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 13, 2008
Could you just respond or comment on that? … And UPS apparently participated for some period of time. They did.
31 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Darrell Sanders
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2025
Is this- What about his comments to, Sanders' comments to Detective Stieber the next day, where he said he was close to acting on his thoughts, which, you know, seems like that might get you there. … The act of circling the area of the elementary school, stopping at a stop sign for a prolonged period of time, driving up to two specific minor girls, engaging them in conversation, all while having the
21 min of audioOral argument — National Treasury Employees Union v. Russell Vought
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 24, 2026
notice and comment rules on the following 10 subjects. … And I'll start with clear air.
97 min of audioOral argument — Loudesia Flanagan v. City of Richmond
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 17, 2017
It was more than comments. I guess that's what I was getting at. … I think that their argument was not only did she make the comments, but there was a course of conduct that occurred over a period of approximately 12 months where she would not allow access to the volunteer
36 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Donnell Delgado, Jr.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2014
Didn't the prosecutor in Arizona indicate that this is not a repetitive act, this is not a dangerous act, and all that kind of thing? … He made a comment when he was arrested about trying to get off the grid. He made a comment about knowing that this came from Arizona.
19 min of audioOral argument — Hill v. Gonzales
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2005
The question I was about to make preceded by this comment, if you'll allow me. … In this case, they didn't make any serious challenges that the immigration judge had acted inappropriately.
20 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Torres
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2003
is going on almost every week or almost daily for a nine-year period during the gambling season. … How do you read the court's comment that said, in response to counsel's comment, Judge Edgeworth said, she may have been candid, but she wasn't truthful?
28 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Richard Maike
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2024
He's got a clean objection to that. And meanwhile, I mean, he does seem to be one of the least mentioned defendants in some of this testimony, certainly Anzalone's, I would say, about the scheme. … What gold said is that while from a plain air perspective this instruction was fine, in the future we think you should draw more clear distinctions between an ordinary MLM and an illegal pyramid.
74 min of audioOral argument — Soul'd Out Productions, LLC v. Anschutz Entertainment Group
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2020
First, artists who perform at Coachella may not perform at any other festival in all of North America for a period of about six months. … That becomes a wrongful act.
36 min of audioOral argument — Ruben Palazzo v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2026
The Truth in Lending Act requires there to be periodic statements. And doesn't that go against you to some extent when you say statements are sent? … To, I think, Judge Winnan, you asked about the Truth in Lending Act requirement for periodic statements. I just want to be candid with the court.
42 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Jordon Ford
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 20, 2013
This is plain air. It is not plain air. There was an objection made, wasn't there an objection made on, it wasn't the objection that I'm making. The double jeopardy claim. That's my point. Yes. Yes. … Count one is simply conspiracy to commit armed robberies from a period of time. It doesn't list any overt acts. It doesn't list these are the robberies that he committed.
75 min of audioOral argument — Baird v. Iozzo
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2020
DelGiudice's comment about Article 5 and 9, and following up again on the justice's comment, Article 5 and Article 9 relate to separate trusts for the children. … And let me see if there's anything else that I wanted to comment on.
53 min of audioOral argument — Rosie D. v. Baker
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2020
There are two provisions of the Medicaid Act which require timely treatment for children. … Again, the Commonwealth should comment on this.
61 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Melendez-Perez (Rosalio Melend
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 17, 2024
So it's a small act, granted. But an act that fails in light of the fact that they didn't succeed on those two. … If the person is being resentenced now as opposed to then, there may be evidence of rehabilitation in the period between then and now.
56 min of audioOral argument — Cooper v. Pasadena Unified
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 25, 2007
That's a 17-month period. In fact, the termination didn't happen until one week after Mr. Cooper filed this complaint, filed the charge. … Cooper brought claims both under ADA and Rehabilitation Act. The Rehabilitation Act does not require administrative exhaustion as a prerequisite to suit before the district court.
22 min of audioOral argument — Victims of the Hungarian Holoc v. Magyar Allamvasutak Zrt
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 30, 2014
His comments in the European Court of Human Rights. … All that is saying is that there was a period of time when others took control of Hungary.
48 min of audioOral argument — Ms. S. v. Regional School Unit 72
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 5, 2018
Those terms simply did not exist, nor did the concept of having two distinct filing periods in Maine's regulation. The Procedure Act, because the mistake was not substantive. … The relevant time period here, Your Honors, is in the winter of 2010, when the Department was considering the change at issue.
39 min of audioOral argument — Omaha Seldins v. David Birdsell
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2019
Although the trustee had two pending acts. As I understand it, for the highest bid for those claims. Correct, although there were some. Your client didn't bid. My client did not bid. … It's a matter of when we're talking about abuse of discretion standard or clear air standard, whichever you want to say, then I've got to find that what they did has no foundation. Nothing.
32 min of audioOral argument — Andrew Dudt v. Daniel Driscoll
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2025
In April, the 30-day period had already run. … So this court has howled in Christ versus Secretary of the Air Force that the board must give a reason that this court can measure as to why it made its decision.
30 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.