Documents

Oral argument — United States v. SpineFrontier, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2025

Therefore, the jury may infer I acted in good faith. … It occurred over a period of time.

Oral argument — People v. Martin

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2018

You have the air conditioning on, stay right here. Exactly, and I want to hear you, sir. Thank you, your honor. Well, Mr. … If defendant, that's what the Post-Conviction Hearing Act is for.

Oral argument — Stacey Hart v. Credit Control, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 22, 2017

Is that it, period, or a debt with somebody? Yes, Your Honor. Identify the debt? They don't have to identify the debt in the message. Just say the word debt. Yes. … So if it were a voicemail that was gibberish or just dead air, that's probably not a communication. But if they're giving some information, soliciting a return phone call from a debt collector. . .

Oral argument — Garcia v. City of Amarillo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2021

And I would point out that this is particular this case shows particular problems when the agencies do not act. … So, this letter was a letter to the city attorney saying, you know, terrible things have happened to my client, and that related to the whistle in the air, the horn honk in his ear.

Oral argument — United States v. Si

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2019

And I would suggest, Your Honor, that 1959 requires that there be an evidence-based inference rather than merely this sort of generalized in the air notion that the Trinitarios are going to generally want … These individuals were founding members of the bad boy gang and over a period of years engaged in numerous acts of violence, not just these four murders, but numerous other shootings, stabbings, and assaults

Oral argument — In Re: M/V MSC FLAMINIA

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2020

The district court found that MSC did act reasonably. … So even though they might have inerted the hole, they completely nullified the CO2 discharge by opening the mandala because of the rush of air. And that's exactly what happened here.

Oral argument — Monasky v. Taglieri

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2019

This would be the longest period of time in which any re-return order has been entered, wouldn't it? I don't know if it is the longest period of time. … Everything about the entire situation surrounding this child was simply up in the air.

Oral argument — United States v. Smith

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 3, 2024

I was struck also by the fact that the calls recorded during this one ten day period, period of the, his conduct was over 400 of his were related to drug trafficking. … He was making a comment about control, and the management enhancement requires only some control.

Oral argument — Qwest Communications v. City of Portland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2009

Co-location services are simply the rental of space, provision of heating, ventilation and air conditioning and security services. They don't involve connection. They don't involve transmission. … Goodnight's comments, if I may, on the in kind. And may I say, Your Honors, I've been doing this for a long time. It's right here. I have to say that Mr.

Oral argument — People of the State of Cal. v. FMCSA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 12, 2026

But the federal HOS regulations do regulate off-duty periods for bus drivers, right? The federal regulations regulate off-duty periods for the end of the day and the end of the week. … to read preemption under the Motor Carrier Safety Act.

Oral argument — United States v. George Robey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2016

First, Robey was not brought to trial within 70 days as required by the Speedy Trial Act. … Your Honor, you know, there are some periods which we don't contest because they're right after counsel was appointed. And even if some other periods maybe bleed into that, we only need 20 days.

Oral argument — Trans Div of Intl Assc-SMART v. FRA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2020

I'm just asking whether it comes back when we look at the, whether the notice and comment period was fair and adequate. And is your answer to that? … And the comments received during the comment period. Recognized that whatever the agency did could have preemptive.

Oral argument — Hurd v. The City of New York

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2020

Uh, and they determined that she acted, did not act unreasonably. Now, how do we go from that to finding that she acted with deliberate indifference or recklessly? … But but but the air seems to me, frankly, frankly, is that she equated parole to conditional release. Now, is it not the and he became eligible for conditional release?

Oral argument — Lindsley v. Omni Hotels

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2024

But this court made no comment one way or another about when those comparators were paid more or less, because timeliness was never raised. Let's talk about comments one way or the other. … The district court never even commented on it. Didn't rule on it whatsoever. That was error.

Oral argument — N. C. State Conference v. Patrick McCrory

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 21, 2016

What are your comments on that? … I mean, that is a relevant point, but it also goes to the knowledge with which the legislature was acting.

Oral argument — Wagner v. Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2019

Wagner was making comments to the Department of Labor that reflected poorly on him. The third thing was, based upon… Was that what she testified to? … He was fired based upon the comments in the evaluation. And at the time the evaluation was done, the shoe and glasses issue did not occur.

Oral argument — Fulfillment Services v. UPS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 13, 2008

Could you just respond or comment on that? … And UPS apparently participated for some period of time. They did.

Oral argument — Osher v. Deutsche Bank Securi

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2009

Lamb who bought after a time period when there was information in the marketplace that this company had been paying commentators to tout the stock. … The rumors came out in the May-June 2001 time period. That's cited in the record. There were news articles about the fact that the company was paying commentators.

Oral argument — Hill v. Gonzales

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2005

The question I was about to make preceded by this comment, if you'll allow me. … In this case, they didn't make any serious challenges that the immigration judge had acted inappropriately.

Oral argument — United States v. Torres

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2003

is going on almost every week or almost daily for a nine-year period during the gambling season. … How do you read the court's comment that said, in response to counsel's comment, Judge Edgeworth said, she may have been candid, but she wasn't truthful?